this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
304 points (95.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

38212 readers
1307 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 141 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (13 children)

In the long run, using mice to test human medicines will result in selection pressure for humans whose physiology more and more closely resembles mice.

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

they use a lot of other things… including living human cancer cells in a petri dish

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I believe the vast majority of cultivated human cells are cancerous cells anyway.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrietta_Lacks

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

when researching cancer drugs, yeah

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe the real cancer is the friends we made along the way

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The reality is that even if there was a magic bullet for cancer, all cancer, it would only extend lives a few years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

well no, they kill cancer in petri dishes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halvar@lemy.lol 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

i love this idea let's become mice

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 weeks ago

they are widely known to be the smartest creatures on earth, followed by dolphins, and then us

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

No, we will become monke

[–] Technotica@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

No! We will be crab! Everything becomes crab!

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 57 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

(not mice), but Fancy Rats are extremely susceptible to tumors. It sucks. More rats I've owned have died of either cancer or respiratory illnesses than old age.

Bonus shot of my boy Finn:

[–] RedRibbonArmy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You say that but he always wears a leather jacket and carries a flickknife with him when he goes outside!!

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

I can fix him

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] happysplinter@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Triumph@fedia.io 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The whole concept of “curing cancer” is such a trope. Cancer is a condition, and it annoys the fuck out of me that people treat it as one disease like measles or the flu.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Just like with antibiotics. When Penicilin was originally tested, they happened to test it on just the right animals. One kind of standard lab animals would have just died from that stuff.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I mean, there are like dozens of different types of cancers, so we probably have missed some of them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Or it was too cheap to duplicate so there was no profit in it…

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Cheap to duplicate is great for them. That means larger profit margins.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or it worked too well on mice and stopped regular cells from dividing.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We know a bunch of ways to kill cancer cells. Unfortunately, we usually want to avoid killing the non-cancerous ones, which is considerably harder to do.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

reminds me of trump's suggestion of using bleach to treat people with covid

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

We warned the stupids off doing that way too quick if you ask me.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Now now, you can't be picky! And really with the outcome being the same, there's no reason to bicker.

[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

There are preventative measures but they’re all based on the rich not poisoning everyone for profit.

[–] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The crazy thing is we actually do have things that work in humans but not in mice. Mice are omnivores and are very different in terms of optimal energy state. They tend to run in glucose more easily than on fat and their whole biology is built to be small and fast, with short life spans.

Checking how DNA repair works in an animal which lives for maybe 2 years is great for understanding DNA repair in short lived organisms, but we have tk repair damage for 50 times as long. It is just so much more complex and requires such different tools when you switch from maybe 2 years to maybe 80 years, it really isn't sane to assume it will all carry over.

Now for an accute toxin, say tobacco, sure, some things work just fine. There is not a huge difference between humans and mice when subjected to cyanide or arsenic. Being crushed by a falling piano is going to kill both of us. But a chronic poison? That will take decades to kill? That is very different. We can shed cells in a different way to how they can. We have more mass to store things. We have more energy storage. We have bigger kidneys with more opportunities for filtering. We are different.

When we enter ketosis we have some fairly significant cancer responses. When we maintain fasting for 5+ days we have a fairly large bump in autophagy, a state where the body kills off and recycles damaged cells. This state can cause some types of cancer to be more obvious to our immune systems and allow the tumor to be attacked. In some cases otherwise inoperable tumors can be removed after shrinking them through fasting. This does not replicate in mice. So yes, some treatments (not cures because that doesn't really apply) do work in humans and not in mice.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.kya.moe 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They're cooking up human organoids just for that.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

i was wondering what that smell was

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Otoh, mice have never been healthier.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Also who is out there making sure all of these incredible discoveries are accessible to mice more broadly, outside the labs?

This IS happening, right?

load more comments
view more: next ›