So, I have a background in religious history and texts, I took five random contradictions and checked them out, just for fun. Every single one of those either, missed the context from neighboring passages, or missed the point completely. I'm not here to say that there are no contradictions in the Bible, but the work here is shoddy at best.
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
364 points (91.7% liked)
Data is Beautiful
2901 readers
1 users here now
Be respectful
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Thanks for sharing your expertise with us!
Are there any major contradictions that come to mind off the top of your head?
Haha, thanks for saying expertise! I would decline the compliment though. I minored in religious histories and actually was one credit away, but didn't finish. Mostly because I was ready to be done with Electrical Engineering, my major. I regret that, now. So, in my humble opinion, the contradiction/discussion on whether G-d does evil is the most fascinating. Isaiah 45:7 depicts G-d as the creator of all, peace, chaos, light, and darkness. But multiple times, especially in the new testament which generally switches over to G-d being a god of mercy, depicts G-d as someone who does not do evil. Some theologians blame the council of Rome for the inaccuracies, but I think it's more complicated than that, as the old testament is not without a merciful G-d.
I think it might come from that, and I do feel like there's something missing in the canon. There's honestly so many missing texts, that it's a shame. But I think G-d is in a superposition, almost. He is all, at the same time. However, this is just my personal explanation that comes with my own personal biases. This is just the example that came to mind, because it's one that can't be brushed off. Looking into the definition of the Hebrew words for light, darkness, chaos, peace, leads to discussion as to the actual meaning behind it. Is it allegorical? Is it definitionally exact? Who knows!
But yeah, in a nutshell, that's my favorite one and I like all the discussion by folks, much much smarter than me with Doctorates in the subject. I'm actually friends with a Doctor whose focus is on whether G-d does evil, so that might bias me again lol. But it really is so fascinating. As society, especially in the western Christian Church, G-d is thought of as this one dimensional character. But in reality, He is multidimensional, varied, and extremely complex. I hope this dump wasn't too much. I highly recommend reading through some dissertations on any subject/contradictions you find, as it is incredibly complex and fascinating to read through.
You can say god on the internet, the fuck?
So, that comes from a Jewish tradition where G-d's name should never be destroyed. I've subscribed to that theology myself, because I like it. If you'd like more information on my religious beliefs, it could be easily summed up as, I believe G-d is in everything. The air, our pencils, our food. He is all encompassing. I believe there is great truths in all religious texts and to dismiss any, is of great detriment to one's personal spiritual journey. So, yeah. When referencing G-d's name, I do not write it. But that's just my own personal journey, no need to get hot about it lol
load more comments
(1 replies)
Info dumps by nerdy folks who are passionate about stuff are my favorite!! ☺️☺️
That's super interesting, thanks for explaining! And yeah that's a pretty central contradiction, I can see how that'd drive a lot of theological debate/discussion. Even within the public consciousness it feels like you have the two versions of the christian god, the "turn the other cheek" and the wrathful god you must learn to fear.
I get not wanting to accept the compliment, there's often a really big difference between a true expert within a field of study and someone with "expertise" in the more coloquial sense of someone having significantly more specialized knowledge than a layman. Regardless, you know a lot more than me or most other folks in this thread and I really appreciate you sharing your knowledge and perspective with us ☺️
Anytime! Like I said, it's a passion/hobby of mine, so I like to delve into it. Religion is so fascinating and it's cool how so many religions have emphasis on peace and love that gets distorted by humans. I'm saddened by some of the comments in the thread, as it's a large indication of people who refuse to be curious and learn, and would rather stay ignorant. Cheers!
Not an expert, but I love the field of blood
In the book of Matthew, Judas goes to return the money that he got for turning in Jesus to the priests. They refuse to take the money back, so he throws it into the temple and walks away. He then goes out and hangs himself. The chief priest doesn't feel that he can accept the money, so he uses it to buy a field with the "blood money" and it is called the field of blood, which is used to bury foreigners.
In the book of Acts, Judas uses the money he received to pay for a field for himself, and when he walks onto the land, his body bursts open and all of his blood and entrails fall into the field. And that's how it became the field of blood.
The only way to try to marry these two together is to completely step outside of what the scripture says. That doesn't stop people from trying, but there are two very separate accounts.
Edit; to clarify, I don't mean literary contradiction like this thing says it's ok to do X and this says X is forbidden. I was just pointing out stories with very different resolutions.
I have a background in having been raised by religious nutjobs, but I did the same and was very disappointed by how badly these get it wrong. I’d love a handy meme guide of actual contradictions that I can casually share, but this is not it.
Yeah, if I had more time, I'd do it. But even still, I think memes eliminate a large portion of the discussion and nuance that these contradictions require. It's not as white or black, as I've seen folks make it out to be. I'm sorry you had a bumpy upbringing, in that regard. I did as well and went the complete opposite way. I delved into every religion and I love them all! Cheers!
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(12 replies)
Modern Christian Nationalism is more than enough of a contradiction for me to not even take this dumb cult seriously
There's another side to the cult. The one that gets people to join. They preach love and peace and tolerance. All while holding a hate book of fiction and pretending their god isn't a made-up genocidal religious maniac terrorist.
They can do that because they ignore reality. They end up funding the radical religioius terrorists, and any radical terrorists that join and want more hate - it's all waiting and set up for them.
It's not just one cult. They're all cults, and in almost the exact same way. They've been doing this crap for thousands of years, and they're good at lying.
Since two people already commented on 7 and 9; 263 and 264 as well as 323 and 324 are duplicate! Thank God these are the only ones...
There is no greater commandment than to love your neighbor as yourself. That pretty much contradicts the entire Bible
You would think a all powerful, all knowing, omnipresent entity would be better at proofreading his main document. 4 accounts of crucifixion/resurrection, only 1 mentions zombies (Matthew 27:52-53). I would think that event would be newsworthy enough for all of them to mention it.
Truly is mind boggling that any intelligent human could consider the Bible as anything more than pure fiction/fantasy.
I think that those who have read the Bible (many self proclaimed Christians have not) understand the principle that the Bible is a collection of stories that are used for interpretation of day to day life to give them a more structured moral integrity rather than cut and dry "this is what the Bible says so there is no flexibility". Life isn't a set of hard rules to follow, the Bible gives you guidance, not rules.
That said, I'm a devout atheist. Just an observation about others from someone who was forced into Christianity, questioned it, and left.
I do feel that anyone can believe what they want to, if they feel it makes them a better person or gives them a sense of community.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Yeah unfortunately when you tell the same lie a gazillion times some will actually start believing it, specially if you inject it into the minds of kids at such a young age, even if it's the dumbest shit ever
load more comments
(1 replies)
(asking as an atheist)
Does this include laws that are no longer applicable because of Jesus' covenant?
I'm surprised I didn't see this comment earlier, but I'd like to respond, if I may. Jesus says, "I did not come to abolish the old law, but to fulfill it.". We can take this at, relatively, face value and look at Jesus' life and works and see it as a perfect representation of G-d's plan.
The abolishment of the old law is a "new" concept. It is formed from Paul's letters and interpreting them in such a way that is self-referential. In that, modern theologians use it to justify itself. In the research community, this is a big no-no, as I'm sure you can understand. The old laws specifically, are so nuanced and historical based, that it's a joy to research!
E.g. Eating pork. This is something that is debated currently. Is the law there to prevent people from getting sick, as handling pork in those times was ripe for disease? (You would end up with more meat than you could eat quickly enough). Or was it for health reasons? But why then, was there so much pork eaten in the BCE?There's so much interpretation that isn't explicitly said, that it's fun to delve into. This is also an example of contradiction, using historical analysis and anthropology research.
According to Jesus none of the old laws changed. He was very clear on that.
load more comments
(2 replies)
This "beautiful" dataset contains duplicate entries (#7 and 9). There may be others, stopped reading after that.
load more comments
(7 replies)
It's even more frustrating when you read older tests which are often collages of even older stuff and sometimes contradict themselves from one paragraph to the other. I guess it is what it is, people thousands of years ago really wouldn't formulate things the way we do. Also the emphasis on things having to be factually true, and logically consistent, is surprisingly modern.
7 and 9 are duplicates
Not a holy book. Just fiction thrown out by stupid people thousands of years ago that had zero idea how anything at all works other than farming, fishing, and war. Not even written by the same people, or at the same times.
TLDR: You're a fucking idiot if you follow any of those bullshit lies and hate..
that had zero idea how anything at all works other than farming, fishing, and war.
They wrote these stories 2000 years ago, what should had they know about? IDK about the whole bible but in the life of jesus story there are some good passages such as preventing a woman from being stoned. The bible wasn't entirely invented out of anything, it draw influences from other traditions and philosophies that merged in the area
that story isn't in the earliest copies we've found
tl;dr: You're a fucking dangerously infectious idiot if you follow any of those bullshit lies and hate. We, as a species, need you to get better.
FTFY
load more comments
(1 replies)
what's the source?
I found this and it says it links to the original (but the HTTPS cert is old so I didn't click through):
https://onthelineministries.com/are-contradictions-in-bible/
Its not the source but it goes through each contraction and I think for all of them argues they're not a contraction. Their arguments seem convoluted but might make sense. They're obviously committed to saying they're not contradictions so a pretty biased source but I'm guessing so was the original.
They also said some things that are in comments on the OP:
One of the funny things I noticed about this is that some (many) are actually duplicate questions and questions of such a similar nature that it is almost pointless to answer them one by one as I could group many together into one single answer.
But the fact that question #7 and question #9 are EXACTLY the same, word for word, I believe it gives a clear testimony to the deception the image attempts to give
Is this in response to a thing going around Christian circles where they say the Bible contains 65,000 hyperlinks, and humans couldn't have done that so it must have been God?
This "hyperlink" business is based on a similar graphic that someone put together and it really is pretty. Each "hyperlink" is supposedly a part of the Bible that references another part of the Bible. But I could never find their data, although they sell a print of the graphic.
I did once find a website that documented 100,000 Bible "hyperlinks" and the data there is absolutely a joke. Like, any verse that mentions the word "good" is a hyperlink to every other verse that uses that word
That looks like a overlay map of solar flare activity. Coincidence? I think not.
GOD made this too small to read!
God works in mysterious ways
/s
I need, like, a click or hoverover-able version. I'm really curious what the repeat offenders here are.
view more: next ›