Wait they currently don't?
The United States is a seriously weird country. You can get arrested for crossing an empty street but restaurants don't have to tell you what's in your own food. Seriously.
this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
148 points (99.3% liked)
News
37007 readers
2089 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm shocked that it isn't a law already. It's been obligatory in the EU for 10 years. Although a lot of restaurants don't follow it...
This will likely turn out exactly how proposition 65 turned out.. the one where they have to disclose if something may cause cancer or not. They literally just slap it on every single product whether it contains cancer causing stuff or not. So I can see every menu having “may contain every allergen known to man” next to every item now lol.
This won't fly with food. Companies are no longer allowed to use "may contain X" as a catchall. They now need to deliberately add X to their product.
That is the most insane solution that I can think of. I'm afraid to ask what would happen if they updated the California cancer law. Would companies start adding Trace Amounts of carcinogen? Probably, based on what I know about our " literally the worst parts of cyberpunk and none of the cool s***" world that we live in right now.
Inb4 Trump fixes that with an EO.
Everyone ignores prop 65 because the consequences are so distant. But anaphylaxis is very immediate. No one is going to take that kind of risk. That gives a much higher incentive to properly label things.
They only have incentive to not get sued. I can totally see them label everything as potentially containing allergens such as peanuts and shellfish and stuff just so they can say “oh well we warned you” when there is a case of anaphylaxis.
Allergens aren't dangerous to your health they're just dangerous to some people's health. Personally I can stuff my face with peanuts and nothing happens, there should be people that we kill.
If somebody ordered an omelet and it turned out to have peanut in it for some reason and they subsequently died that would be a pretty hefty lawsuit, so I'm honestly surprised this isn't already a requirement.
Which people would you like to kill exactly?
This is good, but I wish it included suppliers. Too many restaurants don’t actually know if some of their ingredients — especially processed ingredients like flour — may have been cross contaminated and don’t want to statements about certain things as a result. I worry this will result in false sense of safety by consumers with allergies because the restaurant doesn’t use it directly but uses a contaminated ingredient, or restaurants listing all potential major allergens on everything to cover themselves.
Their suppliers should already have that information available, especially if they also sell their products to consumers.
This is already done in the UK and it's pretty useful.
I just ordered food at an airport lounge in the US and thought it was cool to see the allergens listed next to each food item.
Lmfao why are we fighting for telling people what they're eating? We have got to start causing a scene or were fucked.
Two reasons:
-
Sometimes what a place uses as an ingredient in a food item is not obvious.
-
People are incredibly stupid.
But mostly item 1.
I think this should be a no brainer easy slam dunk for every jurisdiction ever. We have real problems that really aren't all that much harder to solve and we're not looking at them.
People should be able to readily tell what they're about to eat for a myriad of reasons.
Also, 100% agree with what you said, just wanted to drive what I was saying home