this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
584 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

20690 readers
1802 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 55 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As long as your errors are randomly distributed you should keep making observations until you get an error of -347% in the other direction, thus cancelling out your previous error and allowing you to model your entire existence with Riemann curves

[–] FreeBeard@slrpnk.net 43 points 9 months ago (2 children)

No measurement is perfect. If your statistics are well executed, the measurement is a valid contribution to human knowledge.

Also every measurement is of great impact as long as nobody else can measure more precisely. So just wait πŸ˜‰

[–] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hey, if we play this right, we can get a constant named after us!

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Constant-ly gets it wrong. I can already see it 🀩

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Knowing what not to do is just as important right?

One more method checked off the list!

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 41 points 9 months ago

Back in my early years of uni, we had one of those tests in which every question depends on the previous answer and we had to round every answer to two significant figures. For some stupid reason, a friend and I decided to also use the rounded figure when inputting the values into the next question instead of working algebraically. By the last question, we were off by like 5.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 36 points 9 months ago (1 children)

One time my lab partner kept the waste and threw out the product

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's just a matter of perspective

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 12 points 9 months ago

I don't think my lab supervisor is gonna see it that way XD

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

β€œClearly the model is wrong”

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

The main difference between Science and fucking around is that Science has you write things down. So long as you record everything you did, even if it ended up with wildly unexpected results, it's valid.