this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
561 points (99.6% liked)

politics

26856 readers
1650 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A lengthy investigation from The New Yorker estimates Trump and his family will have enriched themselves by more than $3.4 billion by the end of his second term, much of it from deals, transactions, and investments that almost certainly wouldn’t have happened if he’d never been president.

Archive article: https://archive.is/L6luo

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 119 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

That's $100 stolen from every single American in the country

From every kid, from every grandma, from every person in hospital

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 97 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That was his only reason to get into the White House.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 108 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Well, also protection from prosecution.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Are we still sold on the theory that a billionaire ex-President was finally going to get his come-uppence via a state court campaign finance law conviction, when the judge deliberately dragged out the sentencing until after the polls closed?

Or are we holding out on Kamala Harris being tougher on Trump than Clinton was on Reagan or Bush was on Clinton or Obama was on Bush or Trump was on Obama/Hillary or Biden was on Trump 41?

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The special counsel had finally moved forward with prosecuting right before the election. There was going to be a federal trial. That all got dropped when he won.

[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 3 points 4 months ago

what a strange thing to do

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trump's been doing crimes since the 1980s and skated every time. You are deluding yourself if you believe a special counsel was going to finally do its job, the day after Trump returned to political irrelevance.

Not when everyone from Guliani to Comey to Garland had dragged their heels for 40 years.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The thing is, we don't know. The evidence was clear as day.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago

The thing is, we ~~don't~~ know. The evidence was clear as day.

Fixed that for you. The fact that it's so obvious and egregious, yet they STILL dragged it out until it was too late makes it clear that the fundamentally corrupt US "justice" and political systems would never have reined him in, even if he HADN'T managed to con his way back to the white house.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well, also protection from ~~prosecution~~ punishment.

He was successfully convicted. He didn't even get a slap on the wrist. At best, he got a paper cut from the judge throwing the sentencing papers at him.

He got zero jail or prison time.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Speaking of which, whatever happened with that judge who threatened consequences if Trump continued to ignore his orders? Why isn't Trump in jail yet? Dude's a fucking judge; quit fucking around and arrest his ass already.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

It went nowhere because he wasn't going to be the first judge to give a former and possibly future president any consequences.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Even Hitler got thrown in jail. It was a ridiculously cozy jail for a few months, which gave him time to write his infamous book, but still.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Indeed also that.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Does that count the $2 billion that Jared got from the Saudis? I feel like 3.4 billion is very underestimated.

[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Check the other article - it doesn't count all the crypto holdings Trump has that are worth over 11 billion or there abouts. post link:https://lemmy.world/post/34308185

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That article cited like 15.9 billion including cryptocurrency. I am sure it is even more than this.

Why are criminals running our country again...

There are no rules keeping a serial pedophile, rapist, fraudster, bankrupter from becoming President?

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 months ago

There are plenty of rules, it's just that half of the elected officials are traitors. He should've been ousted with the first impeachment but half of the country yearns for fascism, or at least they think they do until the boot is on their neck. I can only hope I live long enough to see Rafael Cruz struggling to breathe with a boot down his throat, wondering if he'd have escaped it if only he'd licked it harder.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

Release the Trump/Epstein files

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fuck, he really is winning

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago

And no one will see the inside of a prison cell for this.

Hey, guys, feeling great yet? I mean from my point of view of looking from the outside in then you don't look that great. Looks like a filthy paedo and his family are taking you all for a bunch of idiots and you're doing fuck all about it.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (3 children)

First thing we do after the purge is nationalize every asset owned by Trump, his family, and co-conspirators, then we divy up checks for all citizens, and put the rest aside for all the lawsuits the country will have to pay out because of Trump.

If we can keep Trump alive, it would be fun to remove as much of his skin as we can while still keeping him alive, then force him to do shitty manual labor until he dies. In his last agonizing Moments we can give him a bath in brake fluid and rock salt.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Oh yay, slavery and torture for our enemies, that will fix everything.

Ehrm. That’s reactionary, not revolutionary. Not even funny, really.

[–] RedPostItNote@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Good luck controlling the population if they ever get their hands on the dude. I’ve never seen these levels of rage from American citizens about anyone before. There can easily be a point where he’s not safe anywhere.

[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

It's fucking hot is what it is.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Dr. Fistington, how many doses of this treatment would you recommend daily and should he be taking it with water?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/08/18/the-number (where the daily beast got the story from)
Quite the rollercoaster.

According to the long and detailed list, about half of it is cryptocurrency stuff. WTF.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

about half of it is cryptocurrency stuff.

Makes sense, since that's literally what it was invented for.

They may SAY a lot of florid shit about independence from corrupt institutions and real value, but in reality, rich people wanted money that isn't regulated or taxed like real money to make it even easier to further enrich themselves without giving anything back to the people who suffer from their excesses.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 months ago

Despite all my rage, I am still just a rat in a cage.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 11 points 4 months ago

PHEW! Thank GOODNESS he CUT my VA BENEFITS and my SOCIAL SECURITY and my Kid's EDUCATION! NOW I'm not so Worried about affording this!

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think the elite will cause America to suffer a Greater Depression, and makes all these millions, billions, and even trillions, mean nothing. A big rig filled only with $100 bills would be worth less than the vehicle itself.

Americans will illegally migrate to Mexico, because they can work the farms for bread and a roof, not dollars.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing that the collapse of USD will probably be the final push towards American Balkanization. Probably because the states will have to effectively discontinue the usage of USD for purely economic purposes, while the feds will continue issueing USD for workers until they all effectively leave.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That is more or less my guess, too. We will likely see CaliBux, Monero, Euros, and so forth all jockeying to become the next big thing in America. My guess is that the east coast in particular would adopt the Euro, if only for the stronger connection to the EU's commerce bloc.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it'll vary by region and the nature of the local economy, for example I wouldn't be surprised if some areas devolve to barter and trade but eventually start trading in precious metals. Regardless I suspect that for the most part the only uniting thing is that digital currency that is to say non physical money will probably fall out of favor to some degree, for pretty much the same reason folks back during the great depression continued to stuff their mattress with dollars that being the banks are probably going to shit the bed.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think that privacy coin might actually take off - up until recent times, the US wasn't likely to fall apart. There wasn't a need for a digital currency that couldn't be controlled by government. Vaccines, hormones, and NSFW bans would all contribute towards legitimization, doubly so if food or a new Underground Railroad comes into play.

But anyhow, we live in interesting times. I think BOTH of our positions about digital and non-digital currency would be true. I can see canned food being the #1 physical currency, since it is non-perishable food.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Note I am factoring in as much the secondary effects of such a scenario, namely some level of trade collapse. Crypto of all types requires a certain level of technology that may be nonviable in a lot of places due to people not being able to get the tech or being unwilling to use it for such a purpose, even maintaining the required Internet infrastructure would be effectively impossible. A little ticket entitling someone to a pound of ground beef issued by a state who is holding things together though requires at most a printing press with a hole puncher to show used ones.

Currency is a complex thing but one of the few uniting factors for it is ease of use and ease of production. Ingots were used in the bronze age because every blacksmith needed them, coins were used in Europe for centuries because gold was a useful liquid asset that was hard to fabricate, paper money started as IOU tickets that could be exchanged for coin, and postage stamps could be used in lou of cash. Crypto almost as a baseline can't fill the niche as required, unless you backed it similar to the previously state food stamps but at that point just use paper.

[–] BD89@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lol he's fucking almost 90 like come on dude what the fuck are you even going to do with the shit.

[–] argarath@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Number MUST go up!!! That's all those fucking billionaires think of

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Following in Putin's footsteps. The filthy rich should have taken note:

“After Khodorkovsky’s conviction, the other oligarchs went to Putin and asked him what they needed to do to avoid sitting in the same cage as Khodorkovsky. From what followed, it appeared that Putin’s answer was, “50%” He wasn’t saying 50% for the Russian government or the presidential administration of Russia, but 50% for Vladimir Putin personally.”

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Yup. All these rich fucks giving him gold bars don't realize that's just the entry fee. He is going to demand more and more until he owns them.

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Like this old dodard thinks he's gonna take the money with him somehow.

Money doesn't have an exchange rate in hell, pedo.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He has capitalism brain. All these sick fucks can think of is acquisition of more money at all costs.