this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
-61 points (38.9% liked)

/0 Governance

249 readers
94 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Update: Although we officially still have a few days remaining on this vote, it seems clear that this proposal won't be voted in.

Thanks to everyone for their feedback and votes! I had expected a split vote on this one and it turned out around 1/3 for the proposal and 2/3 against, so that is a quite emphatic no! And of course, we will respect the vote.

I hope we can maybe revisit our instance blocking policies more generally after lemmy has properly working per-user instance blocks, as some folks commented as it will open up more options for personal choice. For example, we could keep a list of sanctioned instances (like csam site) as it works now, but maintain a separate list of "use with caution" instances (aka hesitations in fediseer) that are blocked by default in each user's personal blocklist. But now users could choose to enable those sites for themselves if they wanted to.

For me, that seems like the best overall solution for user choice, and for the new user experience. But it may not sound good to you folks, so that's why we have the voting system in place so we can get quality feedback and also hopefully generate ideas for improvements that will benefit the community.

On that note, anyone can contact me or any of the site admins if they have a proposal they want to appear here on the governance community, and we'll be happy to help you out.

Unruffled


Hi mateys. I'm gonna keep this short and sweet because I don't really have any skin in the game on this one. I am in fact quite happy to leave this decision up to the wider dbzer0 community. On that note, please do not comment on this post unless you are a dbzer0 user - we'd prefer not to have anyone else weighing in.

This post isn't to convince anyone to re-federate or otherwise. In fact, our admin team genuinely doesn't know for sure what our community sentiment is on the topic, or whether or not it's worth a try. My guess is that the community will be quite divided on the topic, as many users are on the topic of hexbear. But the only way to find out for sure is to ask you, so here we are.

But I will say that for me personally, although we still have the occasional drama, and despite past run-ins, I have slowly grown to appreciate having some hexbear users around to help balance out all the turbolibs. While I think its fair to say our instance and theirs will never see eye-to-eye on certain topics, we have coexisted with them in relative calm over the past 12 months. If we can achieve ~~harmony~~a ceasefire with hexbear, then maybe we could do the same with lemmygrad?

I'd also prefer our users to make their own choices with regard to instance blocking of leftist sites in particular.

Obviously there will be some folks here that will hate this idea, and some who think it is worth a try and/or would like to make their own choices with regards to blocking. All I will ask is that you go have a look at lemmygrad.ml before you vote, and ask yourself if there is anything posted there you think warrants keeping them defederated?

Because this might be a divisive topic, I'm setting the threshold for this proposal succeeding at >66.6% majority rather than the default >50% so that there is a clear mandate.

The proposal is as follows:

That dbzer0 removes lemmygrad.ml from our blocked instances list for a 1-month trial period. Another vote will then be conducted to either federate permanently or to reinstate the instance block.

Notes

  • AFAIK none of our admins have discussed this with lemmygrad prior to this post, so we don't know how they will respond, even if this vote succeeds. But having just checked, we are not currently blocked from their end, so in theory re-federating will be a straightforward process (at least technically).
  • We really don't want to cause a big rift in our instance over this, so please there is really no need to get into heated arguments (I mean, what are the chances? Lol). Your vote is what counts most and we will commit to be guided by the voting outcome.
  • If this vote succeeds we will reach out to their admins to see if we can come to some mutual agreement about reintegrating our communities while hopefully keeping conflict to a minimum. Having said that, some conflict is probably inevitable ngl. But I think we will be able to ride it out ok.
  • I've covered a lot of concerns and talked about conflict a lot, so I'll just add that the big positive of re-federating is that there will be a ton of new users and content to interact with, which will hopefully add to the Lemmy experience for our users if the proposal is voted in.

expiry: 7

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No thank you. I have zero interest in dealing with genocide apologists, regardless of their purported idealogical leanings.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No. Does not sound appealing. Refed with them so a huge chunk of us get fed up and have to manually block, knowing they're still nominally connected to the instance? I really don't want to be surrounded by that stuff nor by people being influenced by it.

Edit: Honestly, the more I think about it, the more I dislike it. If you hop over there and read many of their posts, they don't just lean hard left/right, they are in a genuinely alternate reality. Like, you could move some of their posts to an alt-history roleplay and they'd make more sense. I'm down to hear different views, but I want them stemming from this reality. Harder no than before.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zedd00@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. I don't see any benefit in giving a bunch of fash more chances to worm into people's brains.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] confusedwiseman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I spent some time browsing, and we choose to federate, my block list will need to expand. If others want that…OK, but that’s very much not for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s gonna be a no from me, fam

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chaoticnumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm clearly in the minority here, but I'm in favor of a trial refederation.

Support.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No.

Even in here you can find the tankie triad starting shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KarfiolosHus@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolutely not. Cannot wait to be yelled at by the politically demented radicals that I'm a libtard under a cute puppy post.

I'm exaggerating of course, but not too much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd be willing to give it a try. They can be frustrating at times, but to me it's not really worse than with liberal instances. I'd understand if the community here doesn't want to put up with them though.

I haven't checked it out in a couple years, but I remember there being several decent communities over there. But their more authoritarian communities are pretty shitty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] krox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think a trial is a very reasonable thing to conduct, I support a trial run

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hexbear is insufferable a lot of the time, no thanks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Enzyoo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So, it appears unruffled is MIA and I can't reach him about this right now, so...

I've revised this vote to make it more fair to the objectors (without permission :3). The main problem seems to be that lots of you don't want to see grad content, and that's fair; personally, I think their instance can produce shit takes a lot. So in this revision (and FAQ) I'll try to address everything.

The original plan was: run a trial vote, federate for a month, and then immediately run another vote to cement/reject this.

Thanks to the comments here, here's my personal changes:

  • Shorten the trial to two weeks instead, thanks to the two users that suggested this
  • After the trial, defederate immediately instead of running the next vote asap. Then once Lemmy properly fixes instance blocking (I.E. completely block an instance, as if it was actually defederated), we can run the vote, but more fairly; users who've this will get it, and users who reject this can easily block it, as if it never happened. Win win?

Forgive me if I'm missing stuff, I'm far away from home and busy, and can't do too much admin duty, and I'm only really commenting this since unruffled is offline xd.

FAQ:

Why, and why now?

A lot of users, including one just recently who quit their instance, are sick of liberals. This is mainly meant to be a counterweight to that. Although seeing some users here live some of their content, I guess that's a plus, too.

As for why now? Well this really started over two casual conversations about grad, tankies, and liberals.It's odd I have to admit, but oh well ¯_(ツ)_/¯

What if I change my mind and want to defederate again?

Besides the fact that instance blocking will be fixed during that time, anybody can always start up a vote for defederation! This isn't a permanent, set in stone thing

Didn't we have good reason to defederate before? Why refederate?

Well, kinda? Not really. I asked db0 about this and here is his response:

The reasons are simple, I didn't know much about hexbear at the start and took them at their words that they're not just tankies, LG was stalwartly running apologia red fash regimes like North Korea and that was a bit too much to stomach for me. By how I learned that LG is basically the same as hexbear ideologically just without the left unity and dirtbag left approach.

And afaik grad has been defederated from the very beginning anyway, no voting took place.

I hope I covered everything. Personally? I don't really care about this too much, whether it passes or not I probably wouldn't mind. Most of us admins are neutral/skeptical, since we've never federated with them we've never interacted with them at all.

Anyways, this is the community's choice. If you guys don't like it we won't force you, and if you like it we'll respect your wishes.

If you have any other suggestions of compromise, feel free so reply here. Cheers

[–] plant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Support. Do it

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ahhh, how about no, please.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A very tacit yes? If it's in the interest of opening up discourse, I think a trial could be good. If this contributes to a healthy discourse, then it's fine by me. If we just invite them to be the auth-left aga-toad to our lib snake problem, hell no.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd be in favour of this. I came over from lemm.ee, I'm pretty sure they were federated with lemmygrad and TBH I hardly ever saw any posts or comments from them. They seem to keep most of their insane views to their own communities (although that may just be because so many other instances have blocked them)

Personally I think defederation is mostly pointless now that users can block instances themselves, and one of the main reason I picked this instance is that not many other instances are defederated. I'd rather defederation was only used when absolutely necessary. To me the whole point of Lemmy is that it shouldn't matter where anyone created their account.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I am anti censorship and we need the users to develop critical thinking, because then the problem would eliminate itself. However, as instance owners, you (unfortunately) have the responsibility what content is visible on your instance, even if it is just some copy from somewhere else (the law is not quite compatible with distributed systems). This means, you have to block any extremist views which could endanger any of your instance’s users (even visitors, technically). So even if it is censorship, the survival of this instance is of more value, than to enforce pure anarchy.

I am for blocking lemmygrad. And hexbear. And @dessalines@lemmy.ml.

In others words: don’t ever federate again.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Support.

Unblocking will add more positive than give irritation. Maybe shift this instance a little more to the left, and spark debate, which is good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rivvvver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m voting no, I’m against it.

I’m of the mindset that if there’s already been a decision to defederate, there should be a very good reason to consider refederating. After looking at the posts over there it seems pretty dead. I don’t think there’s anything of any quality being missed, and I don’t personally see any reason why we should undo the defederation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abies_exarchia@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m enthusiastic about opportunities for pan-leftist collaboration in the face of outright fascism across western states. I think a trial period is sensible. This may even benefit folks that are against federation with ml because this will generate more evidence to support defederation if they deserve it. I feel like this re-evaluation is warranted given the (i expect) influx of lemm.ee users to dbzer0

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ElCrusher@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›