this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
540 points (98.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

12550 readers
1163 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Why believe in the completely logical explanation when there's a bat shit insane one right over there?

[–] gizmonicus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

I am so completely fucking done with these brain dead ass conspiracy theories about cloud seeding. Science illiteracy is a real fucking problem.

You. Cannot. Create. Torrential. Rain. With. Cloud. Seeding. Alone.

Cloud seeding precipitates rain from existing weather systems. If those clouds do not contain the water required to create a torrential downpour then it is impossible to create a torrential downpour. And if those clouds have enough water in them to create a torrential downpour, it does not require cloud seeding to precipitate it.

It is soul crushing to have to explain to people that human beings do not yet have the capacity to steer and control large weather systems. And it's very likely that we never will, given the scale and the amount of energy that it would require.

We cannot control hurricanes. Why? Because hurricanes possess and release more energy than the entire combined energy production capacity of human civilization. They are mind bogglingly powerful, and to think that we can steer them to target political enemies IS BATSHIT INSANE.

Climate change is real. Republican conspiracies cause me physical pain. And I need a stiff drink.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

(It's not just the greenhouse gas emissions from all the combustion engines, BTW. It's also the greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing the asphalt, the destruction of vegetation to make room for pavement, etc. Electric cars can help treat the symptoms, but cannot cure the disease.)

[–] Phineaz@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd wager that asphalt is a minor, the concrete below (or any concrete in general) might be more of an issue.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Its the entire package. The tires, environmental destruction to make way, the manufacturing, the maintenance, all just to shuttle everyone around in isolated boxes going mostly the same direction. Its a fucken joke.

[–] Remmiaz12324567@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

All those Indonesian tropical rainforest burned for the palm oil, and Amazon forest for the cattle. Both are mega diversity areas for plants and animals and many remained undiscovered

[–] Traister101@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Eyy somebody else watched the new Climate Town vid haha

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

We can save animals, if we know what to save

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago
[–] don@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Consider a bag. Now fill that bag with nothing but wet bags. That bag of wet bags is a rocket surgeon compared to any given republican.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I love how when I started reading this comment, I thought it was going to be some deep dive into the structural integrity of the main bag being compromised by the wet bags, and it would lead to some analogy of how compromised our systems are.

Nope. Just a confusing shot at republicans that you didn't see coming even as you read it. Like POW! HOW YA LIKE ME NOW??? and you're just reading it like...

Oh ho ho ho! hearty chuckle

And then you get sad because you remember the whole world is still one massive dumpster fire.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sorry, why do the bags have to be wet? Does the wetness affect the intelligence of a bag?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

He left out the "paper" part: "wet paper bag." MTG is as intelligent as a wet paper bag is at holding stuff without tearing.

[–] don@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

It's just a fun descriptor, and no, it has no impact on the intelligence of any of the bags involved.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I was wondering if the bill MTG is gonna try to bring to a vote about making weather modifications illegal could be used against major polluters?

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

It could, but the supreme Court and other Republicans would never allow it.

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity. It will be a felony offense.

I think that "for the express purpose" is in there precisely to prevent those lawsuits.

[–] Hellinabucket@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

In theory yes, in practice absolutely not.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago

Both actually. A Cessna looks cute and small but its the size of a bus and uses just as much gas per mile as a bus or a big truck and it only carries two to four people. It makes huge noise, causes accidents and uses leaded fuel! Leaded fuel! WTF!

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

In addition to particulate nucleation sites, which help precipitation, combustion also creates new H2O vapor by consuming oxygen and freeing hydrogen from its carbon bond in fuel. While most may view this image as a simple CO2 equation, that’s not weather modification; it’s climate modification.

In an off-grid mountain community in the southern Sierra, a lifelong resident said in the pub that it used to rain every afternoon in the summer when he was young. Compared to now where it rains about every 10 days. By my estimate that was about the time smog was at its worst in the state, a time of 10mpg and muscle cars. I wonder if his memory was already an altered condition from natural.

[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Private jets help with that too.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Some what related, I was having a chat with some friends about possible retrospectives in how history will see us. I was curious as to anything positive coming out of this whole mess. Not that maga would do it on purpose or anything, but what if someone uses MTG's bill to jail some of the most heinous polluters in the country. Possible Trumps fuck ups with trade and tariffs lead to overall less being made and shipped. I doubt it tho.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure MTG's bill is specifically written to exclude heinous polluters. It is only persecuting people trying to fix the problem, specifically.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I wouldn't be surprised if it did. I'd read it, but anything MTG is writing is not worth it.