this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
942 points (98.8% liked)

Aged Like Milk

251 readers
627 users here now

A community dedicated to all those things in media and elsewhere that didn’t stand the test of time, at all.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

Damn it's a shame they didn't put in any protections against gutting these essential programs.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 19 points 6 hours ago
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world -3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

GOP wants to kill it. Democrats want to privatize it. Both are an enemy of the people.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

You are correct, but idiots still think in team sports terms WAY too much, even here on Lemmy. If one side bad, other side good! If you say anything like "both sides bad", then you're definitely a shill, and definitely not someone aware of how conservative US Democrats actually are!

There's definitely no room to properly discuss how liberals are enemies of leftists, and always have been. Definitely no room to discuss how having to ally with liberals shouldn't give them a free pass for all the BS. Definitely no room to discuss how the lesser of two evils is still evil!

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 156 points 1 day ago

Jean-Paul Sartre said it best I think.

"Never believe that anti-Semites [fascists] are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past."

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 86 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did it "age like milk" when they were just lying the whole time?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Cheese is good, though. Bullshit seems like a more appropriate comparison.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

Aged like racism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 102 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Stop slandering Orangutans. That’s a candid shot of a fine gentleman.

Comparing them to MTG is a horrific action.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

As an enjoyer of Magic: The Gathering, I think her sharing the same acronym is a horrific action.

[–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago

Lol that's what my brain thinks every time, it always takes me a second to get past the "why is everyone so mad at magic??" (Aside from obscene prices, but that's why I just print fake cards for casual play)

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 17 hours ago

that is actually a howler monkey, orangutans are actually quiet.

[–] RampageDon@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't this a howler monkey? Point still stand though.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You’re probably right. I don’t know my monkeys very well.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Clearly, for the orangutan is an ape!🤦

/s, just teasing, although it IS an ape, just like my mother.

[–] guy@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

GNU Terry Pratchett

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UsernameHere@lemy.lol 68 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (6 children)

"Entitlement Reform" has been a watchword in both parties going back to the Reagan Administration.

Democrats will tell you they've got an innovative exciting new solution to slow the rate at which health care costs rise, then shift a bunch of public sector money over to private sector subsidies.

Republicans will tell you they're cutting fat out of the system, then transform a bunch of public sector spending into private sector tax breaks.

Healthcare gets more expensive and less accessible. Each team blames the other one. A few socialists in some of the bluer states suggest we try a public Medicare-for-All model, then get primaried out of office in the next cycle by a pack of lobbyists in blue waist coats.

"Ah, but the pawl and the gear are clearly two different components doing separate things!" I cry, to any sucker who will listen.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

It doesn’t always feel that clean cut to me. I’m not arguing that you are wrong. You are absolutely correct! You are describing a huge problem.

But our stupid voting system is another problem that serves to keep that first one in place. Small uprisings against the two party system might be noticed but they will be filtered out. To change the system it seems there has to be widespread and persistent discontent and rebellion well beyond what we’re already seeing. We’re definitely moving in that direction though, for better or worse.

That stupid voting system means that if you are going to support a third party with good ideas, you must necessarily withdraw your support from whichever of the pawl and gear you prefer to the other. Enter ranked choice, star, etc.

So in an election like 2024 when it comes time to cast the actual vote, I’m left thinking: So what if I take my finger off the pawl there, and what we thought was a gear starts spinning like a buzz saw and cuts my fucking leg off?

I guess going loopy from blood loss while I point my femoral artery at people like a garden hose and find ultimate rest knowing I was right about the system sure beats dying from nuclear winter.

So that’s what so many can’t ignore when it comes time to choose. Yeah if we elected Harris we’d be living in a country of capitalism and inequality, with Israel doing horrors under our wing. It wouldn’t be a good outcome.

But compare it with what we got. I’m just some employed straight white father living in suburban nowheresville USA, but I would very much rather my government didn’t have a gestapo, or bomb Iran, or sell access & secrets, or leave NATO, or support fossil fuels, or work against green energy, or round up people who have been living a peaceful productive life and destroy those lives by the thousands because they are ethnically undersirable to the base.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Show your work.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Don't work, Daddy musk is here to make a 3rd party which will toxify the potential of any legitimate 3rd party, and we will continue on with the same system.

If their plan for not having elections at all doesn't come to fruition

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

That was actually just one of the mating calls of the Samsquanch

load more comments
view more: next ›