this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
476 points (98.2% liked)

News

30249 readers
3798 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The House of Representatives is trying to pass a resolution making the term “Free Palestine” an official antisemitic slogan.

Republican Representative Gabe Evans from Colorado introduced the resolution in the wake of the attack on a gathering for Israeli hostages in Boulder this week. Mohammed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national, has been charged for the attack, during which he yelled “Free Palestine,” according to the FBI.

“Whereas, while shouting ‘Free Palestine,’ an antisemitic slogan that calls for the destruction of the state of Israel and Jewish people, Mohammed Sabry Soliman attacked the peaceful demonstrators with homemade Molotov cocktails,” the resolution reads. House Republicans are expected to vote on the nonbinding resolution next week.

(page 2) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 19 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not antisemitic. I know that I'm not, even if I can't prove that to anyone who cannot see into my mind. But in words and actions, I've never done or said anything antisemitic.

I believe that Palestine should be free. Passing a law isn't going to change my mind or affect my behavior. If someone calls me antisemitic, they're either mistaken or lying. Passing a law won't change the truth behind their words.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Making a statement legally classified as antisemitism opens up legal retaliation under the guise of “hate speech”, which is not protected speech.

It doesn’t change the truth of it, but it does change he the consequences of it.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Not be contrarian, but this is a common misconception. Hate speech IS protected speech in the US, but it can be used to enhance the punishment of a related crime into a hate crime.

It can also, under specific circumstances, be considered "fighting words". But again, that depends on the specific context and is not broadly true.

This is one of my least favorite facts, but it is unfortunately true

[–] natecox@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, if we’re being technical then “hate speech” isn’t a legal term at all, but I should have made it clearer that I was alleging the republicans were building their usual flimsy-as-shit-case to harass their “enemies”.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

That is for sure. There is no question that it is an asinine attempt by the GOP to weaponize the law, rather than a genuine attempt at protecting Jews in any way, shape or form

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Triflingmagoo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago

I’m not anti-semetic. My dentist is Jewish.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 10 points 22 hours ago
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

I wonder how few democrats will vote nay.

[–] chebur54@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

How about calling the country "Israhell" or better with the genuine name "Occupied Palestine"?

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 15 hours ago

I append the word "genocidal," much as has been done with using "communist" as a prefix for various nations. Genocidal Israel.

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

Well, when you put it that way... Free Palestine.

[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What happened to "America First"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

What always stuck me as odd with that attack on the Israeli's was that the cops didn't blast that guy full of holes the moment they got there. I always thought it was a very out of character show of restraint from the same cops that shoot black children out the window of their car if they see them with a stick in their hands.

I know it's fucking mad to suggest such a thing, but was it a false flag attack? Intended to give some credence to future "antisemitism" measures like this?

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 4 points 21 hours ago

No human should be treated as less than another. No human should be seen as offensive to another.

Why is Great Britain not getting so much fucking hate for how they historical contributed to this conflict? If people are wanting to legalize hate towards the humanitarian treatment of a whole territory and people, why is the nation that contributed to their existence not being criticized?

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Is being antisemitic a crime?

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Oh well, they can label me what they want. This does nothing to change my mind.

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Sure, call me any ugly name you choose—

The steel of freedom does not stain.

From those who live like leeches on the people's lives,

We must take back our land again,

America!

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

It doesn't matter. All the Palestinians will be dead or ethnically cleansed soon.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

“Wont someone think of the ~~children!~~ Jews!”

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 15 hours ago

The irony being that both versions of the phrase are used by people who don't actually give a shit about these groups and are just weaponizing it to push a political agenda.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›