this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
174 points (97.8% liked)

politics

24023 readers
3727 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House has brushed off Elon Musk's attacks on Donald Trump as an "unfortunate episode."

Musk and Trump's very public spat began on Thursday afternoon after the president told reporters at the White House that he was "disappointed" in Musk.

Trump also accused Musk of suffering from "Trump derangement syndrome" and suggested that he only objected to the "big, beautiful bill" because it removed the electric vehicle tax subsidies, which would hit Tesla's bottom line.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 79 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Putin said that about Trump last week. Obviously it stung, because he's saying the same thing about Musk today.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

they're trying to establish a dominance hierarchy When all you care about is power and flush ethics, honesty, reason, law, empathy, respect, comptence, decorum, thoughtfulness, etc down the toilet, humans behave like these dumb apes.

It's especially funny because Trump's team's best idea for de-escalation is a 1950s husband telling everyone their wife is just hysterical.

[–] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Elon said that trump would have lost the election without him, and that democrats would control the house.

That sounds an awful lot like an admission of election tampering.

[–] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Check out Election Truth Alliance and SMART, they have several lawsuits already in a few states

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, it sounds like he donated a shit ton of money.

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hmm.

It's almost like his election lottery bullshit was also illegal!

Weird!

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Silly, it's not illegal if you're rich enough.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Lol, now Trump is accusing Elon of "TDS" even though they spent 3 months playing house with each other and Elon funded his reelection. World is being run by a bunch of fucking idiots.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"unfortunate episode"?

That sounds exactly like what Putin would say about someone before he throws them in the gulag....

[–] malloc@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Adult man children run this country while many people struggling day to day or living paycheck to paycheck. Food and water supply poisoned with "forever chemicals". Plus a myriad of other issues that remain unaddressed (climate change).

Their bickering is news worthy because it’s "entertaining". We prefer to be medicated with entertainment rather than deal with real issues. The billionaires have us fighting a culture war with ourselves rather than having a class war against the billionaire class that run this country.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it’s “entertaining”. We prefer to be medicated with entertainment

Panem et Circenses.

Sadly we are missing the bread, luckily we are missing the bread.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Now all Democratic leadership need to do is not align with Elon, challenge impossible?

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

There i$ no way Democratic politician$ would ever $uccumb to Elon'$ lure$.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago

It’d be interesting to see liberals try and defend Musk again if he sided with the democrats.

[–] NotAGamer@lemmy.org 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is a distraction. Look more carefully at what else they are doing right now.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm game, but what? The Cronenbergian spending bill? That's the trigger for this entire fight, doesn't exactly put it under the radar.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just saw another lemmy post that said it’s the sanctioning of ICC judges who opposed Netanyahu and US war crimes in Afghanistan.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-administration-imposes-sanctions-icc-judges-us-treasury-says-2025-06-05/

Yeah, I saw that. Seems like the bill is the bigger story though, to be honest. The bill is trying to Trojan horse a lot of worse things in.

[–] NotAGamer@lemmy.org 5 points 3 days ago

That's my point we don't know because it's not reported on as the media is too busy with this infighting. Reporters need to do their job.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

This entire country is having an unfortunate episode

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

The dispute rapidly escalated through Thursday, with Musk claiming that Trump would have lost the election without his support, and created a poll on X, asking if it was time to create a new political party in America "that actually represents the 80% in the middle?"

Kelmo starting a "moderate" party that shares his extreme social issues would just split maga and get the last of the neoliberl voters out of the Dem party while almost guarenting Dem victories everywhere he runs a candidate.

And knowing him, he'll field terrible candidates everywhere.

This could end up with D super majorities, a progressive president, and no excuses not to actually fix shit when we get the chance.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

more bullshit excuses from a bullshit administration

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

This country is having an “unfortunate episode,” thanks to what’s in the White House.

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Did anyone notice that when trump explained how former aides have a 50 50 chance to develop that made up symptom that this was the first time in years that he uttered a somewhat coherent sentence. Still bullshit but different delivery

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

My litmus test is checking out the reddit rconservative to see how this is affecting them. But I would make no mistake, Project 2025 and the MAGA GQP are extremely corrupt and haven't batted an eye for worse things, and Musk represents only a fraction of the power and wealth Trump has his hands on. MAGA was never too keen on Musk, who was always a liability for it.

These people also have a lot of experience acting and saying what's beneficial to them, and Musk probably knows that he can't just leave and have things go back to normal, he has to find a way to "switch sides" to get people off of boycotting Tesla. Nothing Musk has said had any degree of weight or surprise, and Trump has remained surprisingly diplomatic if this was a true standoff. Whether people consider it a small possibility, trust actions more than words on the TV personality cult sideshow.

[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The entire Trump regime and possibly this timeline are an unfortunate episode.

[–] Zahtu@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

Unfortunately it is an Episode with a lasting Impact in the people and the Planet as a whole (think climate crisis acelerating, ecoelogical collapse etc)

[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 days ago
[–] susi7802@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

We all have.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Runs in the family I guess, and by family I mean Republican caucus.