this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
1293 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

20679 readers
916 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 169 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Had to look it up because I didnt beleive

sure enough its correct

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 133 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Something poetic and quaint about a link to a Wikipedia article titled "Tree"

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (5 children)

reddit has broken me. I was expecting it to point to weed.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reddit has broken me. I was expecting a rickroll

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 101 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Also cool that for a period of like 60 million years, nothing decomposed dead trees. As they would die or fall over, they'd just stay there, piling up. This is where most oil came from. The massive amounts of trees stacking up before bacteria and fungus evolved to decomposed them. Imagine 60 million years worth of trees just lying around.

*Thought I'd add an edit, since this post got quite a few eyes on it: It was mostly coal that all those trees turned into. Not oil.

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 47 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Didn't those trees become coal, not oil?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Mushrooms are the great undertaker, the great decomposer. The Langoliers. They are just waiting to eat you, and they're happy to share their fruits in the meantime. They're fattening you up. They can wait.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I imagine dead trees were flammable, even back then. And oxygen levels were 15% higher. Can you imagine the forest fires?

[–] Crassus@feddit.nl 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fire wasn't invented back then

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 78 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I'm a billion years, crabs will start turning into trees and trees into crabs. merging into the ubercreature

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a billion years

Damn. You look good for your age.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd argue, but I agree. I don't need to know how they look, if they're a billion years and capable of communicating, whatever state they're in looks good. Even if its a fungus posessed rot monster.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"ubercreature" excuse me, lichen would like a word with you

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] m_xy@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

here’s a cool blog post that expands on this There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically)

i didn’t even put it in a bookmark folder, it’s just loose on my bookmark bar because it’s such an interesting post that i reread from time to time

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hash@slrpnk.net 63 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So that's why every stargate planet looks like Canada

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kubica@fedia.io 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nature likes things that turn hard- Wait what?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Weren't there like, several millions of years where trees evolved but nothing had come yet to break down wood, so like, generations of dead forest just fell on top of each other until some fungus was like "that looks yummy"?

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The molecule is called lignin. And yes, there was a good 60 million years before that particular problem was cracked.

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

First, we bio-engineer bacteria and fungi to prefer plastic as food.

Second, these bacteria become a serious endopathogen in the human body while scavenging our precious bodily microplastics.

Third, we engineer a bacteriophage to attack the bacteria in our brains.

Fourth…

The whole human comedy just keeps going and going

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The beautiful part is that when wintertime rolls around the gorillas simply freeze to death

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think palm trees are a kind of grass

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Also, no such thing as fish.

Google it.

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Impossible. If there were no such thing as fish, how could bees be fish?

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I don’t have the tools to know how to respond to this comment. You win.

Edit: Holy shit. I just did a quick google. Boydster is not shitting us. Just google “bees are fish.” Oddly enough, this actually furthers the thesis of fish not existing.

[–] Devmapall@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

To add on for anyone who is lazy like me, the thing where Google summarizes says California has classified bees as fish under an environmental protection act. According to the first result (Reddit) it's because fish is a catch all term in that law. Instead of listing all the animals they just use fish. Because fish,bees, and the other animals are all invertebrates.

Now whoever reads this has three Lemmy comments, a reddit thread reference, and an ai overview reference as some solid sources

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 18 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Fish are vertebrates they have a backbone

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t have the tools to know how to respond to this comment. You win.

This is the best way I've ever seen utter befuddlement expressed. Chapeau!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My sister in law recently quipped that "Trees are a social construct" and at first I thought she was just being glib but now I can't get that statement out of my head.

[–] resting_parrot@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I listen to a podcast called Completely Arbortrary. They talk about a different tree species each episode. They say trees are a strategy, not a strict definition.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Its called convergent evolution and you also have some shit you wouldnt believe that makes all apes similar to us.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

Apes are so similar to us because we came from a common ancestor. I'd love to hear if there are traits we evolved independently after we split though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And it's not even one creature or even type of creature. Look up rhizobium.

Tbf, as we learn more about our gut microbiomes, it turns out that humans are that way as well. Maybe that's why we have the thoughts in our heads vs. the feelings in our guts... (no that's actually not it at all, except... isn't it though?).

[–] DoubleSpace@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I figure the feeling of being in your head is simply due to your eyeballs being located there. Now I want to put a 3d camera on my hips, and steam it to VR goggles.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The hips do not lie. Ipso facto, you would be seeing ultimate truth.

It turns out that the meaning of life is at crotch level.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are fern trees, conifer trees, and flowering trees. Where are my moss trees?

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

theres also a definition of a what a tree in the sense , its develops wood, many things are tree like, but not trees: such as palms(just overgrown herbs), dracaena( aka cabbage tree, they have something dracenoid thickining.) extinct plants like giant lycophytes and ferns

load more comments
view more: next ›