this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
132 points (97.8% liked)

News

33324 readers
1658 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic lawmakers hailed President Joe Biden’s historic decision on Sunday not to seek reelection, praising him as putting his country and his party before himself. Republicans called on him to resign from office, saying that if he could not run for another term, office, then he’s unable to serve as president.

Biden’s announcement came after more than two weeks of Democrats urging him to withdraw from the race. Nearly three dozen lawmakers had publicly called on him to end his reelection bid. Others had voiced concerns privately about what the ramifications would be for down-ballot Democrats if he remained in the race. When the president heeded those concerns, Democrats called it a selfless move.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Republicans were calling for President Elect Biden to resign even while their leader was staging a violent coup to end the Republic.

The fascist GOP can get fucked. What they want should be irrelevant and their very presence opposed.

[–] ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From a foreigner, this is undoubtedly true, unless you goal is secretly to have a king.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Given our Supreme Court ruling that a US president can't commit crimes, they're not being very secret about their goal of making the US a dictatorship.

[–] ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

None of it... Is secret... The trump calls. Even to the fucking election investigator in Georgia!? The paperwork.

It's all there. Any American who supports trump today is either literally special needs level education (and haven't looked at or understood thr tapes) or publicly admitting they would prefer monarchy with trump.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty sad when non-Americans seem to understand the severity of this threat better than people here.

[–] ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Most non-americans that finished school do.

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who cares what the Republikkkans say?

[–] Plum@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Putting equal emphasis on the opinions of both sides is what got us in this fuckhole to begin with. No matter how niche a voice, your opinion matters equal on any and all topics including reproductive health and climate mechanics.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"That 81 year old is way too old for the job, vote for our 78 year old!" is a bold strategy

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 20 points 1 year ago

Especially when he'll be older in 2028 than Biden is now.

Although I'll wager the job is harder on Biden than it is on Trump, on the grounds that Trump doesn't actually bother to do it. He just played golf and signed shit for other people without looking at it.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s the best part. Why is trump even running… he looks so tired.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Because his options literally are win or go to jail

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

His only chance at avoiding prison time for his many, many crimes committed while in office last time necessitate that he become President again, even though it was quite clear in 2016 that he was surprised he actually won and didn't want to do the job.

If he gets elected, all of those active indictments gets swept away on Day 1 and the SCOTUS has already paved the way for him to be "exonerated".

A vote for Trump is a vote for justice denied.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spirinolas@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

If Joe Biden resigned the republicans would say "not enough! You have to commit sepukku on live TV! COWARD!"

[–] supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Speaker Mike Johnson is not fit to be a speaker, so there who cares ?

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So Republicans want to make Harris the first woman president asap? How progressive of them.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If she takes over now, and them beats Trump, would that count as her first term or second? Does it have to be a whole term to count?

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 15 points 1 year ago

If Biden were to resign (which he won’t), then she would assume the presidency as kind of zero-ith term; she could run for reelection twice. Two full terms.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For what purpose? Basically the same thing happened in the 1960s with Lyndon B. Johnson. For purposes of not being allowed to be elected more than twice, she would be eligible to run once more because of the text of the 22nd amendment ("and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once"). We are considerably less than two years away from the end of Biden's term.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know, I completely forget there was an amendment on that. 2 years it is then.

Him stepping down now has no real advantage for the republicans other than causing a minor amount of chaos and time-wasting.

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Mike Johnson moves one heartbeat closer to the Whitehouse in this hypothetical. And the remaining heartbeat would be on tour campaigning, which we've seen can expose someone to high velocity lead poisoning. Plus, Kamala would have to oversee an unplanned administration turnover, taking time and energy away from her campaigning efforts. It's all painfully obvious why they want this and none of it has to do with the good of the country

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Do Republicans just want to destabilize the country until it’s destroyed?

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally yes. That is fascism. Palingenetic ultranationalism.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it means it's spelled the same way backwards as forwards.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

destroy it and then rebuild it according project 2025, sounds on brand.

I don’t think they want to put the time or effort into rebuilding anything.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Koch brother's plan was to invest in state races to win enough legislatures and governors to call a new constitutional convention, and have enough anarcho-capitalist stooges to formally reshape the country as their libertarian oligarchy utopia where the rest of us are just indentured serfs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah bro, where you been?

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Since Nixon

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yes they do.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They just want to destabilize it until they can steal power, but if anything gets destroyed along the way they'll just blame the libs

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Conservatives will turn to authoritarianism when democracy doesn't work for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Maga people sure do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The republicans want Biden to resign so they can immediately attack Harris for simutaneously having no record and attack anything she attempts to accomplish.

[–] VanillaBean@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I hope biden passes a few 'Official Acts' before he heads out.

[–] brianary@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago

Like sending a few choice SCOTUS judges to gitmo

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Unless he resigns, he’s still president until January 20, 2025. So we will see; he’s got nothing to lose, AND presidential immunity.

Usually I’d say someone in his position has absolutely nothing to lose, but being he’s such a … typical guy, he won’t do anything and go down in history as a footnote.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah I bet the want him to resign. Untethered by reelection he might actually do something they don’t like.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't satisfy it Republicans so don't bother trying. Well, unless you use Grindr during the RNC. Then you can probably satisfy Republicans.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago

You couldn't pay me enough to fuck someone who gets on stage and tells everyone that their neighbors and people like me shouldn't exist.

You have to be nicer and more friendly than that.

load more comments
view more: next ›