this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
1324 points (98.6% liked)

politics

23601 readers
3556 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 39 points 2 days ago

She's one of only half a handful of Dems that sound ready to lead people into battle. The difference between how she uses knowledge and intelligence to speak to people is in stark comparison to Trump sounding exactly like he has dementia. She listens and responds. Trump just keeps interrupting any question he doesn't like. Fuck you Maga. Fuck you entirely. You god damn idiots.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Funny what happens when you actually do something.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I would prefer a new party, but I'm glad that she and Bernie are still out there.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sanders isn't a Democrat, and I agree with his recent message that young left-minded people going into politics should follow his lead and stay independent.

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You can also choose "no party" as a voter. Idk how that affects voting in primaries, depending on the state you live in... but it's an option as well

Edit: missed the part about "going into politics", which kinda changes the dynamic of my statement... but still, it's an option for voters that aren't going into politics

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's funny is I was almost going to call Sanders out for, absolutely looking too old for this shit. He's more competent than RFK.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I've taken shits more competent than RFK, that's a pretty low bar.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

She's one of like 3 US politicians that I don't just kind of low-key actively hate.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

tbf, the bar is so painfully low it is not even a tripping hazard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 48 points 2 days ago (18 children)

Disagree. The Democrats dont know who they are anymore. Pelosi and the old Democrats have got to go.

AOC should just make a new party.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 59 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, we don't have time for that. We just have to do a tea party on the Democratic party... Which is what she's been doing

They do have to go, but we're keeping the house and the dog

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The Tea Party of the Left is what we needed back in the Obama days, better late than never.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

You're not really disagreeing. AOC is perceived as the face of the democratic party and it's true. She's at least offering consistent resistance while the feckless leadership of the party does nothing but line their pockets and ensure 100 percent unconditional support of Israel to the determient of all else.

I don't even disagree with your conclusions necessary, if it's impossible to dislodge Pelosi and Schumer. But building a party from scratch is really fucking hard. Hijacking one might be easier.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

I hope she will be successful in actually overtaking the party to some degree, as most high-ranking party members would certainly see that differently

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 292 points 3 days ago (25 children)

Weird. The party that claims to be "for the people" keeps putting centrists in charge. We're ready for someone who is actually for the people!

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 194 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Quickest way to mobilize the Democratic party is to threaten to put a progressive in charge

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 144 points 3 days ago (12 children)

They learned their lesson with Obama. The funny thing is he’s not even a fucking leftist, the party is just so full of dinosaurs they think a modern centrist is a leftist.

[–] Psycoder@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'm a European born American. Obama would be right wing politician in my country of birth.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Are they... Still considering Harris for 2028??? What? Please god. Make it stop. Please.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 99 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I promise you the Democratic Party will do whatever it takes to keep her away from leadership roles because she actually wants to change things.

That’s the one thing the Democratic Party is consistent on: rejecting progressives, even if it means letting the conservatives win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 102 points 3 days ago (16 children)

Next to Bernie she's the best the Dems have to offer. And for any possible run for President, she beats Bernie on age.

If they run Harris again, or Newsom or some other conservative Democrat in 2028, the party is fucked.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I still have to lol about how the stupid qons tried to use her dancing in university as some kind of BAD thing.

Back when Denver Post still had a comment section and they'd allow gifs, and if the topic was AOC, I'd post her dancing. A few of the local wingnuts would try to get me banned/my posts removed over it, esp. if one of the qanon mods was on-duty...

She's the best. Why the buzzkills in the unhinged right tried to paint a beautiful intelligent rep like AOC dancing during college as a bad thing is anyone's guess, but that sure as fuck blew up in their faces....

[–] Sillyglow@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 days ago (4 children)

So let me get this straight: somehow just dancing is somehow worse than drinking beers in fraternities and raping?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

She's a woman and a POC to boot, so....it's rather self-evident that anything she does is going to be worse.

I think even for the most idiotic of maga, they realized that trying to trash her for dancing was not really getting much traction. Especially among cishet men with eyes? Just sayin'. XD

I think the same thing for trashing her for things like being working class - they were trying that on for a while and that seems to backfire, too. Same goes for some big mic drop attempt they try when they call her "Sandy" in some kind of qnut point about how she had a nickname during high school and/or university? ZOMG! /clutches pearls You are saying she went by the name of Sandy, danced, and worked as a bartender? QED, then, I guess. 🤣

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

AOC dancing and having fun is somehow anti-American and full blown socialism, according to Republicans.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We should be so lucky to have a party she represents in this country. The only reason she has that seat is by defying the DNC as a spoiler. They only elevate politicians to the Federal level on the basis of how good they've proven they are at collecting that sweet, sweet corpo bribe money.

The DNC and democratic leadership would rather dissappear her Than Trump by a mile.

The pendulum is the point. Both parties are well bribed to maintain the capitalist's murderous control. Good cop and bad cop are both just fine with mass homelessness and entire murder for profit confidence scheme market sectors. One laughs at you when the capitalists cause you harm, the other just shrugs and says "golly gee market forces nothing we can do! But I affirm your right to die horribly as who you are here in this cardboard box under a freeway! Pronouns are free so whatever I still get bribed 😁" (edit to be clear, respecting others identity is the right thing to do and basic decency, but there's a hierarchy of needs, self-actualization only matters if you have your basic needs met. You cannot live in an affirmation ribbon, you cannot eat a preferred pronoun, priorities.)

If the Democrats were led by someone talking about redistribution, that bribe gravy train would stop. If by some miracle AOC manages to steal the party out from under them as Trump did the RNC, the DNC would be fighting her every move and comment the way we wish they were countering Trump right now. In fact, here's how Democrat leadership spent the months leading to Trump's inauguration:

https://www.axios.com/2024/12/12/aoc-pelosi-oversight-committee-connolly-raskin

Defending the country from one of the only slightly left Reps in the entire federal government.

Democrats like Schumer and Pelosi are far closer to Trump than AOC.

https://apnews.com/article/business-nancy-pelosi-congress-8685e82eb6d6e5b42413417f3d5d6775

[–] Feelfold@lemm.ee 33 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Zero chance the DNC will run her. They'll give us another white bread, right of center, compromise candidate. The Overton window has shifted so far right we need to build a new wall to house it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Well afaik she’s the only one doing a nationwide campaign at the moment

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 149 points 3 days ago

she's got my vote

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I’ve been saying for about 5 years, maybe better, that she is the person I am most excited to vote for as president of the United States one day.

I don’t even have another name in mind.

I will be as happy to vote for her as I was for Sanders in the primaries, twice. I legit can’t wait.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 117 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (14 children)

She's not the face of the Democratic Party

She's the face of a completely new and different party that has nothing to do with old Democrats.

To me, I've been viewing the US as being governed under a one party state for a while ... the Republicans and the Democrats form two halves of the same organization.

The US doesn't need a third party

They need to form a new second opposition party because the old one morphed into the monstrous thing we have today.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›