this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
721 points (98.5% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

3110 readers
120 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 129 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (27 children)

I only have this to say: Fuck the sky pollution. Starlink has been ruining stargazing and star photography and Elon lied about its impact. He claimed they would be invisible with his amazing paint but they're still visible and fuck it up for people who enjoy watching the stars.

[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I see them all the time without a camera. They are bright as the stars when they pass over.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 90 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ah, so this is why Elon wanted the rural Internet bill killed.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why provide a public service when some capitalist can squeeze every penny from that same service?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz 55 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Strange, I've downloaded almost 6TiB over the last month so far and my bill is still $120/mo.

EDIT: This appears to be for global priority customers (movable dish between addresses, on boats, etc) and seems to be because he's increasing his data cap by choice, not because rates are actually getting hiked. Us normal residential customers are the same as always. Fuck Musk anyway, but this one seems to be a non-issue.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

global priority customers (movable dish between addresses, on boats, etc)

Because of-fucking-course anybody who wants to buy and live aboard a cheap (easily $50k or less) old sailboat instead of paying rent forever or grinding for a $500K house is a "rich yacht owner" who can obviously afford $1000/month Internet. And have their home sunk by orcas while we're at it, because why not?

Just when I thought I had a viable plan to escape this shithole consumer trap of a country, the Internet service I would need to do it not only ends up being run by a goddamn Nazi, but they also jack up the price on that use-case.

[–] KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 month ago

Look into Eutelsat. I've heard mention recently that they're expanding as a viable starlink competitor. I have no direct knowledge, but maybe they'd cover your needs cheaper.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramsgrl909@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I live in a rural area. We were thinking about starlink a few years ago, then fiber came to our area. Thank goodness. We've literally had no issues, speeds are amazing, and no price hikes.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Fibre is racist and woke, that's what tramp said at least.

[–] NetworkMachineBroke@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Given his steady diet of hamberders, I'm sure he does think fiber is woke

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 51 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I thought starlink was just an alibi company to buy rocket launches from SpaceX, and make SpaceX appear profitable on paper?

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Starlink is owned by spaceX so they've never purchased a rocket, they just launch

And because of starlink SpaceX will be an insanely profitable company. Starlink is already bankrolling the very expensive starship development.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Then what, are you going to tell us next that going to Mars also was? Come on! /s

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Leopards ate his.. internet?

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 36 points 1 month ago

Oh, now it's worse than every satellite internet company I know. Shame I recommended it to someone because I thought it would be reliable and remain cheap.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I am unsurprised. I thought it would take longer for it to become outrageously priced, but here we are. this specific pricing is extra crazy IMO.

In any case, I scoffed at the pricing when it was almost reasonable during their trial phases.... Back then IIRC it was like $100-150 usd/mo. or something.... That's too much for me already. Seems like they've previously increased it to around $200-300 and now they've lost their damn minds.

Star link was never economically sensible, price hikes were inevitable. There's just too few people in their target audience and too many satellites that are simply too costly to maintain at the levels they previously had. I hoped, for the sake of anyone who required starlink for a reasonable Internet connection speed, that the business plans and corporate users would shoulder most of the cost, but here we are.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Amazon is launching a competing service on its own satelites.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Maybe they'll collide with each other.

[–] JohnSwanFromTheLough@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

Probably, and well be forever imprisoned on the planet in that scenario because we won't be able to launch anything for a long long time again.

Kessler Syndrome

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Those LEO satellites don’t even stay 10 years in orbit without additional orbital maneuvers. It’s not forever.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Ooh, I love rushing towards Kessler Syndrome.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

And this is why capitalism utterly sucks at providing public services.

[–] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not really capitalism anymore if the CEO runs the government too.

Idk what else the USA has to do to show the obvious oligarchy y'all have.

[–] ArtemisimetrA@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago (19 children)

Even if the politicos unironically started referring to themselves as oligarchs, a significant population of US citizens would likely either take it as a joke and hand-wave it away, or take it as further proof that that's just what you do to get ahead.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arc@lemm.ee 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I wouldn't use this service unless I literally had no other option. But sadly "no other option" is why they are able to jack up the prices and change the terms and conditions as they feel like with impunity.

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

What's worse is, because it's an option. The work that was being done for other reliable works will be put on indefinite hold. Musk monopolized our orbit. He needs to be brought before an effective tribunal and have his decision scrutinized harshly. I know, I know. "But he won't". If everyone had that attitude we would still be riding horses so help or shut up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He sees you when you're sleeping. He knows when you're awake....

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

🎼 He sees you when you're pooping.

He knows when you're online...

He knows when you've been fash or woke

So be fash for tesla's sake 🎶

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Slide to switch plan

Ooooh, that's cutesy.

How about "Point a firearm at the screen and scowl menacingly to cancel the service"

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

this slide to switch sums up Elon's perspective on tech, he will want something super impractical and unnecessary implemented as long as he thinks it is cool

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I'm one of those people for who Starlink very much is the only option. I moved from Northern Virginia to Western Maryland. This land used to be state park and all it has is electricity and mail delivery. No water, no sewage, no telephone, no internet other than cell hotspot or Starlink. It sucks but I have to try and separate my distaste for Musk with the engineers and people who actually run Starlink day to day, because at the end of the day the service is pretty damn good. The only issue I have (besides the price) is with VoIP traffic; but SIP acts fucky even with Cat5/6 sometimes so idk. I looked up the current policy and at least in the US they do not have a soft data cap. They did when the service initially launched AFAIK but that's been replaced with a more general "network management" policy (throttling, etc) . https://www.starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1470-99699-90?regionCode=US

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

Just gonna let you know, if ya have 5g available more specifically T-Mobile then ya can get an at home 5g router. It is most definitely cheaper and may have lower latency, though I don't know how their network is on the East coast furthest east I've gone is Utah.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just in time for https://lemmy.world/post/29463383

Any future where these fuckers don't end up in jail is going to become hell.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago

Not even a flat rate for that money

[–] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Oof, my current data consumption for the past 30 days is 1.2 TB on buttery smooth 1Gb fiber. I can't imagine being bound to 500 GB like is the 2007 dark ages.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›