this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
1164 points (99.3% liked)

Political Memes

8757 readers
2617 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 148 points 1 month ago (7 children)

If only there were some way to record previous events, and then maybe (just maybe) have people learn this in a structured environment where they are allowed to ask questions. 🧐

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 77 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

For those that don't get the joke here...

This is an iconic scene that is intentionally designed to portray a very, very boring lecture from a teacher, which none of the kids want to pay attention to, that they are right to percieve this as boredom-torture.

The motherfucking actual literal topic of the lecture is how the Smoot Hawley tariffs of the 1930s massively worsened the Great Depression.

... god, Damnit.

[–] ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Movie: Ferris Bueller's Day Off

Actor: former Nixon speech writer Ben Stein

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It’s important to have the audio for the full effect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 month ago

Anyone...anyone..

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But that would be... an academic pursuit!!! Oh the horror!! Can't have the unwashed masses being all 'edumacated' and questioning authority!

[–] Devadander@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The unwashed masses choose to remain unwashed.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Yes, a lot of them do. But quite a few others are having their critical thinking skills and understanding of the world deliberately starved by conniving politicians (usually in red states) who want to keep them as dumb as possible.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

Time to hose them down against their will then. They stink too much!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago

well obviously! education turns people woke!

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I believe that is now called "DEI"

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

You mean social media?

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

People wrote down Trump abusing tariffs in 2016 and there are analyses about how they damaged the economy. But nobody on lemmy knows about it. People will point out economic theory for why tariffs are bad because they seemingly don't remember the tariffs failing in the real world. Memes forgot 2016. There's even articles about politicians/billionaires selling stock using insider knowledge because "how else would they know about the tariffs?"

It's not like I read the entire fediverse but whenever tariffs are brought up I'm confused why people ignore 2016. It's not trivia, it's extremely relevant to what people are discussing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 121 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Friendly reminder that the rich love recessions. It's their intent to cause one.

That's when they amass greater property and wealth.

Wealth inequality always worsend following recessions.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children)

$s never decrease - they just circulate… if nobody you know has any, and the tv is saying nobody like you has any, someone else has them

(kinda)

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's always a logical point where making more money becomes less efficient than making other people poorer.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 month ago

It's just buying the dip. The crazy part is that despite how rich they are, they still need to do it. At a certain level of wealth, you have infinite money for a certain level of lifestyle. So even though they're crazy rich, they are still living beyond their means, and in order to maintain that lifestyle for future generations, then need to cause economic crashes and buy the dip. Wild shit.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 44 points 1 month ago (5 children)

And here I thought The Great Depression started in 1929. I'm not saying tariffs in 1930 didn't make it worse, but they didn't cause it.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah unregulated capitalist economy did that. Good thing we didn't deregulate the economy since then though.

/s

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

2008 happened for the exact same reasons as 1929, because some of the protections put in place because of 1929 had been rolled back many years before. It wasn't as deeply bad because (dare I say) the US had a reasonable executive branch very shortly after.

But none of those protections were reimplemented. Credit default swaps are still totally a thing, for example.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

CDS markets are also, currently, right now, freaking the fuck out rofl.

Ive been saying this since Trump announced his tariff / deportation policies before he got elected:

Great Depression 2.0, with nukes and climate change this time!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tauren@lemm.ee 41 points 1 month ago (3 children)

To be fair, in 1930 people had little education and no internet. Today you don't need to remember to understand what's wrong with tariffs.

[–] spicehoarder@lemm.ee 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let me tell you a little something about ✨declining media literacy✨

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

You can leave out "media".

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (4 children)

There were radio, televisions, and books. And while people had overall poor quality of education back then because of lack of access, Noam Chomsky mentioned people still try to educate themselves through reading.

The problem then and now is that mass communication is used by bad faith actors to emotionally manipulate the public into voting against their own interests. Back then, yellow journalism riled up jingoism. Goebbels and the Nazis saw potential use of radio for mass indoctrination, and made conscious effort to make radio cheaper and widely available in Germany.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yarr@feddit.nl 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

To be fair, in 1930 people had little education and no internet. Today you don’t need to remember to understand what’s wrong with tariffs.

This makes the assumption that Internet usage makes one more intelligent. I am pretty sure there are plenty of counter-examples.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure, bad things have happened every time we’ve tried tariffs.

But we have to do something to balance the budget!

The federal government has achieved fiscal balance (even surpluses) in just seven periods since 1776, bringing in enough revenue to cover all of its spending during 1817-21, 1823-36, 1852-57, 1867-73, 1880-93, 1920-30 and 1998-2001. We have also experienced six depressions. They began in 1819, 1837, 1857, 1873, 1893 and 1929.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh…

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So old Billy Clinton was the only president to balance the budget without causing a depression? Interesting.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The one exception occurred in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when the dot-com and housing bubbles fueled a consumption binge that delayed the harmful effects of the Clinton surpluses until the Great Recession of 2007-09.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Heh, you can't primarily blame Clinton for the thing that W had 8 years to fix. Have you watched The Big Short?

[–] FearfulSalad@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, no problem then! The AI bubble will carry us through far enough until it all comes crashing down in... I want to say 2027?

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Yes... The AI bubble. Which is definitely still a thing. Definitely.

  • tugs nervously at collar *
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

See, this kind of bullshit is what actually gives some credibility to the various 'cyclical' or 'generation based' models of history.

Such models are often either unjustifiably bold/definitive/precise in their future predictions, or they are reasonably restrained, but the pop culture version of them neuters all the caveats and nuance.

... But goddamn if there isn't some real merit to the idea of humans never learning from their own history being a consistent theme of human history.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Had to read up on the 1828 tariff that was basically enacted as a giant game of chicken, nobody expected it to pass... then it did.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff_of_Abominations

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago

Similar to Trump winning? Twice?

I really hate that we can’t collectively learn from our mistakes.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey they can always do a war again to get that sweet Keynesian macro economics flowing.

[–] Davin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If there is a WWIII, I doubt America will be left alone as much as it was the last two times, especially since that led to America becoming the economic powerhouse it became.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Just the idiotic part of our society. That's more or less a third...

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Always fat, stupid fucks that resemble McNuggets.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago

So every hundred years or so.

load more comments
view more: next ›