This comment, all by itself, is an impeachable offense. Sigh.
this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
587 points (98.8% liked)
News
35915 readers
3251 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
He swore an oath to the very thing he doesn't give a shit about.
The constitutional crisis happened on swearing in day.
The person being sworn in as President by the Chief Justice that day was ineligible for office according to the 14th Amendment section 3. And he could only do that because Congress neglected its Constitutional duty to enforce that provision.
That is all three branches of the government colluding to break the Constitution to put an ineligible man into the highest office.
All three branches ran by his sycophants, the Republicans.
It's hard to imagine how he could have sycophants among those people in the first place. Those people, despite their low moral character, are among the highest echelon of politicians in this country. It's weird that they'd just fall in line.
Well, we know that some of them are simply afraid of the money that he's grifted for campaigns. And on top of that, my current guess is that Trump, a Russian agent, has been given access to all sorts of kompromat to blackmail them with.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Can you imagine if Obama said this? Did literally any of these things?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Many things are impeachable offenses; but nothing is convictable.
load more comments
(1 replies)
We treat him better than any criminal and he still cries about being treated unfairly... anyone else in America would be behind bars right now.
We even have a real life example of this with all of the January 6th convictions resulting in jail time whereas his Highness was protected by a fascist judge who stalled the court proceedings at every opportunity.
Judge Aileen Cannon needs to be removed from her position, never be allowed to hold any judicial or public office position, and charged with obstruction of justice.
Absolutely, and it also didn't help that Merrick Garland (who, let me remind you, was only nominated for SCOTUS in the first place because Obama thought he was so conservative that not even McConnell could object to him) slow-walked the case for two years to begin with.
A jury of his peers literally found him guilty of several felonies.
Upon sentencing, the judge said, "Woopsie! I guess we can't put you in prison because you're a president now. Oh well."
Asked in the interview whether U.S. citizens and noncitizens alike deserve due process as laid out in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, Trump was noncommittal.
“I don’t know. I’m not, I’m not a lawyer. I don’t know,” Trump said when pressed by Welker.
Do you need to be a lawyer to be aware of the Bill of Rights? He's been President for more than 4 total years, head of the executive branch charged with executing the law for the entire country, has a whole staff of lawyers advising him, and has, himself, pled the 5th (!) and he's still not even familiar with the 5th amendment?
And he's sworn to uphold the Constitution (though a serial liar like him is about as trustworthy as a fox watching the chicken house)
Dementia is a path to many inconsistencies some consider to be... a big deal
Just wait till it affects him personally and he will.
It already did and he got off scot-free because of it.
In classic Conservative fashion he benefited from due process when he needed it and now he wants to remove it so others can't benefit from it.
George Washington saw this coming
"[…] cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion."
load more comments
(1 replies)
Two would-be assassins tried to circumvent due process. Due process benefits all without regard for politics. Or it should.
Yes, my immediate thought: he will when he's tried for treason. Not that that will help him, if he and his Business Plot 2.0 co-conspirators are ever tried. So will W, Cheneys, Rices, and if we're lucky, hrc.
If any other president ... Democrat or Republican ... had come out and said the things Turnip has said over the years, they would have lost their political careers by now
The problem isn't this orange idiot, the problem is the mass of people, politicians, funders, enablers and wealthy backers who want this moron in power. Turnip is a powerless fool .... it's the people who keep him power that are the problem
If any other president … Democrat or Republican … had come out and said the things Turnip has said over the years, they would have lost their political careers by now
Ideally, they would've been hanged for treason by now.
Immediately disqualified from office. Whoever stops this menace is going to be considered a national hero, regardless of their methods.
load more comments
(6 replies)
If that's not one of the first questions Monday morning from the White House Press pool they should all be fired. What other Oaths does he not know if needs to uphold? What other parts of the Constitution which he took an oath to defend and uphold does he not believe in?
I N A L I E N A B L E
R I G H T S
Fucking with them is a spectacularly bad idea, just ask the British.
So the social contract is null and void.
And force is the only thing backing up power now with only resistance stopping it.
It would be hilarious if instead of asking this, the reporter asked him to define "due process"
"Of course I know what due process is. A lot of my friends are due process experts, and they're always telling me 'Donald, you do so much process. Nobody does process as brilliantly as you.'"
This is coming from the same administration that thought transgenic mice were transgender mice. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he actually comes out with something like this.
Presidents should do something, like some form of oath, to uphold this kind of things. And pass a test to ensure they understand all the complicated words.
I don't support constitutional due process for him either
Remember when he wouldn't put his hand in the Bible when he took his oath of office?
This isn’t facebook, no one cares if he follows esoteric religious traditions.
The problem is that he won’t follow legal requirements that protect us normal people.
Yeah but it's funny that his base of evangelical Christians doesn't give a shit.
load more comments
(2 replies)
So if he doesn’t support it does that mean you cant violate the constitution if he’s removed by any means?
Well he's the president, so he should really get clear on that. Immediately.
He is clear on it, he just doesn't want to admit it
Oh he wants to waive his due process rights, then?
Has this not been established the past few months?
Ooh ooh I know the answer!
He doesn't.
view more: next ›