this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
281 points (99.3% liked)

News

36270 readers
2637 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 129 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah once they actually get pushback it's all "oops we accidentally drafted, signed, and sent that letter, we didn't actually mean it". This is why everyone should have been pushing back since day one.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

There's also the claim that it was sent too early, so regardless of what the error was, these were going to be the demands all along. They were just moving much slower in the discussion prior to the letter being sent. A wise attempt to boil the frog, and then somebody moved the pot over a rocket engine.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Union makes us strong.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 116 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 61 points 10 months ago

What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people could not understand it, it could not be released because of national security.

As written in "They Thought They Were Free: The Germans 1933-45" by Milton Mayer

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 12 points 10 months ago

Fuck that's good.

[–] ButteryNickel@lemmy.wtf 91 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Trump failed with Mexico and Canada when demanding they change their border policy. They stood up to him and he backed down.

Trump has failed repeatedly with his tariffs. When countries stood up to him, he backed down.

Trump failed to force the ivory-est of ivory towers to abandon DEI. They stood up to him, he's backing down.

Resistance. Is. Working.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not working, because too many ass clowns keep giving in.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Colombia and those law firms look like the jokes they are. The administrators of those places need to resign in disgrace

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 59 points 10 months ago

Translation: We thought we were gonna threaten them and they’d comply. They didn’t flinch, we feel silly, this was never the plan.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Holy fuck "viewpoint diversity" reads like the most dystopian thing I've ever seen. Basically boils down to 'you must also teach right wing beliefs even when they are near unanimously rejected by the scientific community'. If im reading that right it would mean they'd essentially have to have flat earth classes in the geography department alongside all the regular classes, and give them equal resources. Plus who knows what other bullshit. How do you draw a line when you're mandating thar schools teach fiction based on what your followers believe?

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

DEI for stupidity

[–] HiddenLychee@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Wow, you really can't make this up. Two paragraphs about how they need to foster "viewpoint diversity", whatever that means, and they need to keep hiring faculty and admitting students until they have it, followed by a paragraph saying "no diversity in skin color is allowed".

Like, are they are saying a physics department needs to have equal number of physicists and fucking dumbasses, but God forbid the department keep track of numbers to make sure they're not systematically ignoring black applicants.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 34 points 10 months ago

Uh oh, Harvard staff better be on high alert. Last time the White House made an "administrative error", they sent somebody to a concentration camp before mocking him on social media.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 34 points 10 months ago

Oops we accidentally sent you this email that we accidentally wrote.

Yeah that won't work.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“It was malpractice on the side of Harvard’s lawyers not to pick up the phone and call the members of the antisemitism task force who they had been talking to for weeks,” said May Mailman, the White House senior policy strategist. “Instead, Harvard went on a victimhood campaign.”

“Malpractice”? “Victimhood campaign”? Go fuck yourself, May.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Yeah, "victimhood campaign" is probably the most blatant example of projection I've seen from them in a while, and that's really saying something for this group of fuckfaces

[–] tal@lemmy.today 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Let's see what other policies that meet with pushback can turn out to be inadvertent mistakes.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 22 points 10 months ago

Trump getting elected turns out to be an inadvertent mistake….

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 26 points 10 months ago

“It’s not our fault, it’s the fault of a mistake”

lol.

[–] Wazowski@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Bunch of fucking stupid cunt clowns.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Oh no. Just kidding! Fucking cowards...

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago

"Whoops! We fucked up." "Sir, tell them we made a mistake!" said a sycophant with tears streaming down his face.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I'm surrounded by Assholes

[–] Chestnut@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Hire clowns, get a circus

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 10 months ago
[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 9 points 10 months ago

Most smartest and bestest businessman ever.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

yeah it was a mistake that he ever got elected.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

F'ed around with the wealthy and found out.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Sure was. Found out pretty quick.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There should be a sign that's like the likelihood of fire sign, except it just points to which stage of the narcissists prayer the Dump administration is using today.

[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Today's Warning Level: Ketchup

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Harvard_University

Perhaps it's time for Harvard alumni to open the coffers and reject government funding.

This is how enlightenment ideas and ideals became and remained demonized, even in our most liberal of eras, in service of mammon. Now I see the deeper level of kenning in Hawthorne's Young Goodman Brown.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] gt5@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think they mean the $ 50 billion endowment

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

How do you think an endowment works?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 10 months ago

That and their own individual accounts.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

No backsies.