this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
452 points (99.6% liked)

Lesbians

286 readers
1 users here now

A community for lesbians, people whose loved ones are lesbians, people who want information about lesbians, queer people, and allies!

  1. Trans lesbians are lesbians and are welcome.

  2. Lesbians of other nationalities, even ones you “don’t like”, are welcome. Feel free to speak another language if you can, as long as you tag it with the right language flair.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

@lesbians Roommates, again

#lesbian

@lesbian

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Well, as everyone knows, it's gay for men to eat pussy, so therefore it must be straight for women to eat pussy 🤔

[–] [email protected] 55 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not if you declare “no homo.”

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not gay if balls don't touch. And I ain't seeing any balls here!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Wow the article is real and from 2015 and not published on April Fools.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

It all comes back to how bs and constructed sexual categories always were. Yes I mainly like girls and fem people and think they're just way better to be with than men, but why write off every guy on earth when I can just live life free to love? I'm fine sitting in a box bc it has pretty colors, but my box only matters when it suits me. The boxes never were innate, and never will be. So long as people get that I like women, they don't need to worry about me excluding men.

That said, saying these flexible girls are straight is like saying a person with my skin color and ethnicity is white. The category of "straight" functions in a similar way that is defined by historically powerful exclusionary norms. If you're not only ever into "the correct" people, you're a filthy degenerate failure who must kill off that part of yourself to be "straight." Girls who fuck girls cannot fit into that social order unless they deny that part of themselves. It's not enough to mostly like men, you need to conform

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

Despite the click-bait headline, that was actually an interesting and well written article.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

And it gets reposted about once a week.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I’m bi (pan, but the bi flag is better) but… is bi diet-gay?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, it is not, and don't ever let anyone pin a sexuality label that isn't you on you. I am bi and Gen-X. In the 80's and 90's I took constant shit from homophobic straight people, as expected. What I didn't expect, and was truly hurt by, was my homosexual acquaintances calling me "closeted", "confused gay", or "a greedy f*g".

Sorry. I'm clearly still bothered by the bullshit from that era.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Oh dear my comment was in jest, I’m sorry. I call myself gay often but really I’m bi. I’m an old millennial, and grew up when when being tagged as “gay” was a social death sentence. Luckily, I flew under the radar until it became socially unacceptable here to dunk on queer folk. Bow basically my entire friend group is gay, queer, or tans. All of my siblings ended up queer, even the ones in straight marriages lawl. My folks had a lot to learn, and now they’re cool… but weren’t always.

Anyway, I mean no animosity by calling my bi-ass “diet gay”.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

They're under the same umbrella, and are functionally the same thing. Bi is just compatibility with the same/different genders, pan is just compatibility with all genders. Bisexual as a term has had a long and confusing history (it essentially meant intersex in the olden days), so then another standard was created (bisexuality as we think of in the contemporary context) as the terminology evolved, then another standard was created on top of that within the last 30ish years or so (pansexuality).

So basically this, lol.

Scientists now just refer to the entire category as "Bi+" as future forks come out. You get to choose which flag you like best, and everyone knows you are on the universal compatibility standard x3

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Women being gay - wicked. sinful.

Gay dudes throughout western history - lifelong bachelor. never married. lived with his "very close friend" until they both died.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I thought it was:

Women being gay: they were dear friends who lived together for the past 50 years, owned several cats together, never consorted with men, and are now being laid to rest under the same tombstone as it was their eternal wish never to part. What close roommates they were!

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 days ago

Men being gay: we sent him to jail but that wasn't enough so we cut off his balls.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Yeah that's far more like it.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago

That's pretty much exactly the opposite of how it worked in Britain from Victorian times through to the 90s

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean there were women too, they were commonly called derogatory names like spinstress.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I didn't think Spinster was a derogatory term, it was literally a job title of something that women could do to achieve financial independence back in the days when men owned their wives.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think it started as a derogatory term, but it became so. People would use it to imply that someone was ugly or otherwise defective, so no husband would want them. A man unattached is still seen as more acceptable than a woman unattached even today.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

In the same way that any word for an independent woman can be derogatory. It wasn't used in a negative way when I was growing up (in a deeply old-fashioned part if the UK), and as a kid before I knew that being a lesbian was possible I thought of it as aspirational