this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
129 points (95.7% liked)

News

36000 readers
3000 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a potential landmark discovery, scientists using the James Webb Space Telescope have obtained what they call the strongest signs yet of possible life beyond our solar system, detecting in an alien planet's atmosphere the chemical fingerprints of gases that on Earth are produced only by biological processes.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

According to my shitty calculation I did on an even shittier online calculator, the surface gravity should be somewhere around 12,4m/s2. That's not that bad. Perfect for some saiyajin training if you ask me.

[–] joshchandra@midwest.social 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

That means they'd be even worse off than us in any attempts to go spacefaring, right?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

At that gravitational acceleration level, chemical rockets would be incapable of escaping the gravity well. They might have to create an Orion Drive just to get off the planet.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Well a rocket only system is right out.

But... There's certainly still potential for a hybrid system. You can get real high up with balloons, once above the thickest atmosphere rockets work a lot better.

Also, depending on the atmosphere, aircraft could be very effective, you might be able to accelerate to great speeds on jet engines, and then have a second stage based on chemical rockets.

But for the most part, yeah, getting to space on a planet that massive would be an absolute pain in the ass. No simple task.

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Pretty much, yeah.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

For reference, Earth gravity is 9.8m/s². This is about 1.27 gees.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 20 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I read this BBC article about it

Obviously if this turns out to be life that would be interesting, but it could turn out to be nothing.

If it turns out to be some moss or bacteria or other basic life, that would be pretty cool. If it's humanoid aliens then maybe we're screwed.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even if it's not aliens and it is indeed DMS and DMDS finding the non-biological process that produced them would be neat too

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 10 months ago

Yes, win-win scenario

[–] Meshuggah333@fedia.io 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The system is at 124 light years from ours, we should be fine.

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's like 20 days at warp 9, they could be here this year!

[–] JiminaMann@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What's warp 9, actually how fast can we travel?

[–] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is a Star Trek reference:

Warp 9 is around 1000 times the speed of light lol

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Warp_factor

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago

This is the second, and more promising, time chemicals associated with life have been detected in the planet's atmosphere by Nasa's James Webb Space Telescope (JWST).

I thought I'd remembered reading about this before. Sounds like just a couple more years, and they'll be sure this gas is there, which is huge, but not totally conclusive.

Personally, I'd bet it's life. A big rocky planet with an ocean of phytoplankton sounds like our best bet for finding it. The scientists in the article are trying really hard not to be excited

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Finding bacterial would be super cool, we could learn a whole lot from that! But if we do find complex alien life, multicellular life or something like animals, well that's a really, incredibly bad sign.

That suggests that complex life is common in the universe. And if complex life is common, intelligent life should be common. And if intelligent life should be common, but isn't (because where are they all?), that says bad things about the success and survival rates of intelligent species.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

This suggests the planet may be teeming with microbial life, the researchers said. They stressed, however, that they are not announcing the discovery of actual living organisms but rather a possible biosignature - an indicator of a biological process - and that the findings should be viewed cautiously, with more observations needed.

Researchers that have had the media blow their findings out of proportion and take their words out of context one too many times.

This is exciting enough on it's own without the "help" of overzealous reporters making click-bait headlines and misleading people.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So .. we're not special .. whodathunkit?

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's almost statistically impossible that we're the only life in the universe. It's estimated that there are hundreds of millions to possibly even billions of habitable planets in the Milky Way alone. The thought that we're the only planet with complex life, sentient organisms, let alone sapient organisms is just basic human egocentrism.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 3 points 10 months ago

I'm in full throated agreement with your assessment.

[–] iamanurd@midwest.social 12 points 10 months ago

Can I move there?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

(Alien life realizes humans have detected them)

Quick, turn off the lights! Maybe they'll think we're not home.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 2 points 10 months ago

So... we finally found the Borg hideout?

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 months ago

Finding life is like efficient fusion energy. There's always possibilities, but it never comes.