flango

joined 2 years ago
[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 3 days ago

Ladrão da $LIBRA quer legalizar a lavagem de dinheiro...

 
 

Nosso querido @ademir tá famoso kkkk

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 6 days ago

same thing with Syria

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 week ago

That was pretty easy

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 week ago

it looks good but the acoustics seems to be bad

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 week ago

getting worse is getting better

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Incredible setup

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 11 points 2 weeks ago

Is this bus powered by AC/DC?

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They will keep the scam going until an IPO. Then cash out and let the rest of us fucked

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

95% of performance is impressive for a clone

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Time to eat dirt again then

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

What's the science behind cloning?

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 2 weeks ago

Indeed, thanks!

 

I know a lot of people whose lives depend on access to medicine. I know fewer other people whose lives also depend on the machinery and software used to dose that medicine. Insulin pumps, pacemakers, and other crucial, always-on medical equipment are crazy useful but also contain the possibility for insane frustration and resentment. I've been pretty honest over the years that I value having an insulin pump, but that I also hate the manufacturers and designers of every pump I've ever used. If you introduced me to any person who has ever designed an insulin pump I've used, I would probably punch them in the face and cuss them out in front of their children. Every single pump I've used as caused me massive problems - though none as bad as the one I'm about to describe.

 

[...] At the same time, human rights organisations warn that the crisis is no longer merely a byproduct of war but has taken on a systematic nature.

According to the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, “the lack of clean drinking water has become a matter of life or death” for civilians.

UN experts have also argued in a letter in July 2025 that what is happening goes beyond a conventional humanitarian crisis and falls within the use of essential resources as a tool of pressure.

The experts said the issue was not limited to infrastructure destruction, but also included cutting supplies, restricting fuel entry needed to operate water facilities, and obstructing repair and maintenance efforts.

“Israel’s blockade and destruction of civilian infrastructure has left most of Gaza’s two million residents displaced and without access to the minimum vital amount of drinking water,” the experts said.

This recurring pattern, combining direct targeting with sustained restrictions, has led to a deliberate reduction in the amount of water available to the population.

The UN experts warned that the “use of thirst as a weapon” has become a reality in Gaza, stressing that “cutting water and food is a silent but deadly bomb”.

 

Val Kilmer will be the latest Hollywood star to be resurrected by AI. The acting legend, who died last year at age 65, will star in the drama As Deep As the Grave.

 

Imagine a figura de um sapo

 

There have been a lot of complaints about both the competency and the logic behind the latest Epstein archive release by the DoJ: from censoring the names of co-conspirators to censoring pictures of random women in a way that makes individuals look guiltier than they really are, forgetting to redact credentials that made it possible for all of Reddit to log into Epstein’s account and trample over all the evidence, and the complete ineptitude that resulted in most of the latest batch being corrupted thanks to incorrectly converted Quoted-Printable encoding artifacts, it’s safe to say that Pam Bondi’s DoJ did not put its best and brightest on this (admittedly gargantuan) undertaking. But the most damning evidence has all been thoroughly redacted… hasn’t it? Well, maybe not.

 

"A gente não permite que a Tulianne e nossos filhos vão para uma federal. É para manter os nossos valores familiares. A faculdade, a universidade particular, ela se alinha mais aos nossos pensamentos e aos nossos princípios", disse a mãe.

Túlio também disse que um dos motivos é o trânsito e as condições do local. "Dependendo do trânsito fica quase uma hora, uma hora e meia, duas horas [para chegar]. Tem que passar ali na linha amarela, vermelha, é uma zona de perigo, né? E a Federal, infelizmente, está bem precária. Tem greve várias vezes."

Tulianne afirmou que entendia os motivos e concordou com os pais. "Vou deixar [a vaga] para quem realmente precisa, quem não tem condições de pagar uma faculdade particular. Eu estou encantada com a minha faculdade, os meus pais já foram ver. A faculdade privada é realmente um sonho", encerrou.

 

teens and twentysomethings today are of a very different demographic and have markedly different media consumption habits compared to Wikipedia’s forebears. Gen Z and Gen Alpha readers are accustomed to TikTok, YouTube, and mobile-first visual media. Their impatience for Wikipedia’s impenetrable walls of text, as any parent of kids of this age knows, arguably threatens the future of the internet’s collaborative knowledge clearinghouse.

The Wikimedia Foundation knows this, too. Research has shown that many readers today greatly value quick overviews of any article, before the reader considers whether to dive into the article’s full text.

So last June, the Foundation launched a modest experiment they called “Simple Article Summaries.” The summaries consisted of AI-generated, simplified text at the top of complex articles. Summaries were clearly labeled as machine-generated and unverified, and they were available only to mobile users who opted in.

Even after all these precautions, however, the volunteer editor community barely gave the experiment time to begin. Editors shut down Simple Article Summaries within a day of its launch.

The response was fierce. Editors called the experiment a “ghastly idea” and warned of “immediate and irreversible harm” to Wikipedia’s credibility.

Comments in the village pump (a community discussion page) ranged from blunt (“Yuck”) to alarmed, with contributors raising legitimate concerns about AI hallucinations and the erosion of editorial oversight.

view more: next ›