this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
789 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

14150 readers
1381 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

3.5 cm pupils? I've heard of "wide-eyed" but this is ridiculous!

But I never knew a "league" was 3 miles. That's like, a lotta football fields!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Meanwhile I am trying to think of the shape that gives a further focal point

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

I remember somebody making the argument that due to the diffusion of light he would not be able to discern their features at all.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 13 hours ago

I feel it is very important to post this here:

[–] [email protected] 43 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Some rough calculations:

5 leagues ≈ 15 mi ≈ 24.1 km. An average human has hair that's maybe 20 cm wide. Using the small angle approximation we get an angular size of 0.2/24100 ≈ 8.3x10^-6 radians.

At 400 nm wavelength, resolving details of that angular size requires an aperture of 1.22(400 nm / 8.3x10^-6) ≈ 5.88 cm.

So either Legolas has some absolutely massive eyes, has the ability to use both his eyes for optical interferometry (I'm voting for this since it's the coolest), or is just plain magic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

There's magic in this world, it's possible elf sight is slightly magical.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

didnt know old.lemmy was a thing.

Thanks !

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Dang, that didn't federate to my instance. Their math seems to check out too.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If anyone was looking for the exact quote its from The Two Towers, Chapter 2 "The Riders of Rohan".

“’Riders!’ cried Aragorn, springing to his feet. ‘Many riders on swift steeds are coming towards us!’
“’Yes,’ said Legolas, ‘there are one hundred and five. Yellow is their hair, and bright are their spears. Their leader is very tall.’
“Aragorn smiled. ‘Keen are the eyes of the Elves,’ he said.
“’Nay! The riders are little more than five leagues distant,’ said Legolas.
“’Five leagues or one,’ said Gimli; ‘we cannot escape them in this bare land. Shall we wait for them here or go on our way?’

[–] [email protected] 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So 5 leagues wasn't even the limit for him, he could have discerned their hair color at an even greater distance.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I like the "lucky guess" theory. He's bullshitting them.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 17 hours ago

His thought process was probably "we're gonna run away anyways, I'm gonna tell these idiots I can see their hair color lol"

[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 day ago (12 children)

The reason Legolas can see that far is because the curvature of Earth doesn't exist for elves. It is the same reason they can sail off into the Undying Lands without circling back around.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

the curvature of Earth doesn't exist for elves

Doesn’t it? Haven’t come across anything in Tolkien’s works that says this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago

You mean the curvature of middle earth, right? RIGHT?!

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (6 children)

even if you ignore curvature you have a resolution limit that depends on the aperture. Look up Rayleigh criterion for more info

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But does it consider magic?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That would fall under "nonvisual perception"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What about magical visual perception?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think vision would fall girly within the realms of physics. I don't know if you can justifiably call it visual anymore when it incorporates magic

It's like, if there's magic bow that launches arrows at a far greater rate than it normally would, would you say that the energy comes from the buildup and release of tension in the wood? There's another element there, which enhances the thing

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Please don't fix the typo.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

Oh 😭 lmaooo

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you get 50m above the ground and have nothing in the way, you can see 5 leagues away as well. Good luck counting individual people from that distance though. The anime eyes are a necessity

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That, or he’s got absolutely bonkers retinas that have truly incredible sensory density, and an absurdly developed visual cortex to support it.

Argument basis: DSLRs. Compare the detail you can extract from a 1MP sensor to a 100MP sensor, shooting through the same optical setup at the same target.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the pupil size calculation is based on defraction, so it doesn't matter how dense your retina is, if your pupils are smaller than that you still wont see enough detail. This is one of the reasons why we keep building bigger telescopes and especially telescope arrays. The bigger the effective apeture, the finer the detail it can resolve.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Honestly, I’m waiting with bated breath until we as a global society can get our shit together enough to create a massive system-wide observation cluster. The shit we’ll learn from that will undoubtedly be incredible. I want my fully automated post-scarcity hedonistic space communism society. But I guess we have to get through the Great Filter first :/

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn't Middle Earth lore say the Earth was flat, but was made spherical later? Had that happened by then?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes, but it's not spherical for the elves, just the other races, which is why elven boats can sail to the undying lands, but human boats can't.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait, is it the boat that ignores the spherical attribute or the entity that commands the boat?

Can an elf sail to the undying lands commanding a human built vessel?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's neither, it's the Will of Eru Illuvatar that determines whether you can travel the Straight Road or not. Ælfwine travelled the Straight Road and landed at Tol Eressëa in 869AD after fleeing the Danes, and he was a Man, not an Elf.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Gimli and Frodo both also were able to sail to the undying lands

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Yeah but Ælfwine got there by accident, and wasn't escorted by elves.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

I think you have to be an elf building a ship and convince each plank individually that the world is flat

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Eru damn tangential elves flying off into space.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

This gives strong "Lovecraft describing things he doesn't understand as noneuclidian" vibes.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (9 children)

He has very strange-looking ears as well so I don't see the issue.

Also, take that, people who were whining about artists drawing manga-style LotR fanart after the Peter Jackson movies.

Anyway, does Legolas' ability to see very far necessarily mean his pupils must be humongous? The pupils on eagles aren't exactly very large either but as a cursory internet search tells me their internal structure is very different from human eyes. Anyone able to speculate on elvish eye anatomy?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Your pupil is functionally the same as the aperture on a camera. Whenever light passes through an aperture, there is some diffraction that happens to it; the angle of the light changes. This is separate to anything the lens does. If there's too much diffraction, you won't be able to tell two different sources of light apart. The amount of diffraction depends on the wavelength of the light and the size of the aperture. Bigger apertures and shorter wavelengths diffract less. This "diffraction limit" has a formula accordingly.

So for the question, we make some basic assumptions: take the wavelength of red light as it's the longest wavelength for visible light, and assume he needs to be able to tell apart two light sources 2 metres apart at a distance of 15 miles to distinguish individual riders. We figure out the angle between two points 15 miles away and 2 metres apart and now we know the angular resolution necessary. We know that the diffraction limit of Legolas' eyes has to be at least as small as that resolution. We also know our wavelength, so we can stick those into the formula and find out the minimum aperture (ie, the minimum diameter of Legolas' pupils to make out the riders at that distance)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

With coherent detection I think the separation between eyes would allow for this.

load more comments
view more: next ›