this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
371 points (99.5% liked)

politics

22983 readers
3896 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://ponder.cat/post/2330924

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at “protecting” American energy from “state overreach.” The move, some energy experts say, is a legally dubious federal overstep designed to undermine the rights of states and local authorities to combat climate change.

The order claims “many States have enacted, or are in the process of enacting, burdensome and ideologically motivated ‘climate change’ or energy policies that threaten American energy dominance and our economic and national security.”

It specifically points to Blue-state policies like Vermont’s Superfund rules, which require fossil fuel companies to pay for damage to the climate, and California’s cap-and-trade program as examples of efforts to “dictate national energy policy.” In Section 2 of the order, Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to identify state laws or policies “burdening” access to “domestic energy resources that “are or may be…unconstitutional, preempted by Federal law, or otherwise unenforceable.”

What might some of those state laws be? According to the executive order, that could include any effort to address “climate change,” support “environmental justice,” or reduce “greenhouse gas” emissions, among others.

That’s not the end of it. The order also directs the attorney general to “expeditiously” take action to “stop the enforcement of State laws and continuation of civil actions” determined to be illegal.

It’s unclear whether this will stand up in court. Michael Gerrard, the faculty director of Columbia University’s Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, told E&E News that the executive order is “toothless” and that Trump “has no authority on his own to nullify state laws.” Journalist David Roberts, who runs the clean energy newsletter Volts called the order on Bluesky, “wildly, unambiguously unconstitutional” and “dictator shit.”

Others on social media noted the president’s contradiction of traditionally conservative values. As climate reporter and Drilled podcast host Amy Westervelt put it on Bluesky, “States rights! But only when the states agree with us[.]”Climate scientist and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) contributing author Zeke Hausfather posted, “So much for federalism…” And Tulane environmental studies professor Joshua Basseches wrote, “Federal overreach has historically been a crusade of the Right, but these times are wild and different.”

This new White House executive order says that the US Attorney General is going to prevent states from implementing democratically passed laws regarding climate change and clean energy. It scarcely needs stating at this point that this is wildly, unambiguously unconstitutional. Dictator shit.

David Roberts (@volts.wtf) 2025-04-09T05:42:55.516Z

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 114 points 1 week ago (5 children)
  • Climate change isn't real
  • Climate change is real, but man isn't contributing to it.
  • Man is contributing to it, but it's too late to do anything about it.
  • Don't try to do anything about it or we will fuck you up <- We are here. How the fuck did we get here?
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 46 points 1 week ago

right wing propaganda is incredibly effective against those without the training to recognize propaganda

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

global warming opens up the arctic ocean which is hugely strategically beneficial to... wait for it... Russia!

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

More than that is Russia’s economy is fossil fuels

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Don’t try to do anything about it or we will fuck you up <- We are here. How the fuck did we get here?

  • Come at me bro <- Where we're going.
[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 5 points 1 week ago

Capitalism is a death cult

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 3 points 1 week ago

This step did not even exist, I want to get off Mr bones wild ride!!

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just gonna keep posting this:

"It's vile."
They want it that way.

"It's inhumane."
They want it that way.

"It's dangerous."
They want it that way.

"It's criminal."
They want it that way.

"It's illegal."
They want it that way.

The current administration is doing all the evil because...they want it that way.

[–] match@pawb.social 30 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

🎶 ain't nothing but a heartache 🎶

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Tell me WHY!

[–] Nightweb@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

🎶

A little bit of hoarding of the bros

A little bit of A/C in their domes

A little bit of treason’s what they need

To kill the rest of us with their greed

A geriatric fascist dunce

Issuing orders all at once

To pay Elon for the stars

So they can die on the way to Mars

🎶

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the man who murdered my brother!

[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 2 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah, forgot about that.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago

🎶They really want it that way 🎶

There's a secret we wanna know
How the hell, how the hell are we supposed to know?
How to live in the twenty-first century
When every move you make everyone can see
So they tell you

Why generation

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Also: they don't care it's that way

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 week ago

bUt mUh StAtEs' RiGhTs

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know they want us to get violent. But it still feels like we should be. Catch22 or whatever, the real move was to not elect him.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm a musician. I will set his soul on fire with a slanderous mambo. That's about all I can realistically do. But by the gods I'll do it..

[–] juanclaude@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Same. I'll tell my grandkids I fought in the resistance armed with a Telecaster. Twang for the people. Apparently these machines can kill fascists so put me to work.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So when are some of the states going to stand up and say that executive orders have no legal force, and Trump can pound sand?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Or, you know, secede...

[–] nectar45@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago (4 children)

So...is he like...trying to end the world? For the lulz?

Cause it seems like he does

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

He's a narcissist. A true, clinical narcissist with NPD, not just a selfish fuck with narcissistic tendancies as most Americans have been indoctrinated/propagandized/miseducated/deluded to be so as to be optimal consumers.

As such, he truly believes the world, all of humanity, and the entirety of all existence only ever mattered as a function of bringing him, Donald Trump, into being and facilitating his divine grandeur, and can't ever matter again once he's gone.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

he has also never shown to have a genuine smile too,w hich is a red flag.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

that's what the christofascists like about him. they're trying to trigger the end times so they can be raptured. unfortunately they fail to recognize which faction they are in revelations. they're not the true christian church, but rather the followers of the antichrist

[–] el_muerte@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

It kind of astounds me that's these people think an omnipotent and omniscient deity, capable of speaking the universe into existence, needs their help to bring about his plans for Armageddon. Like, God is gonna be foiled if America stops unconditionally supporting Israel or something.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

evangelicals are so obssesed with the rapture yet they are not doing anything that warrant anything to be raptured, aka ascension. the end of time would be when "angels" start appearing over tokyo.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Not for the lulz, for the stacks. Gotta get them greens

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

just look at this map

if for example the us were to control greenland and canada (like krasnov is saber rattling over), we'd just see russia (on the south) and the us (on the south) along most of the arctic ocean (the disputed zone). ocean temperatures rise, the arctic thaws, and the us (a vassal state of russia under krasnov) and russia control all of the trade.
it is not a pretty picture

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

The party of state's rights ladies and gentlemen

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

california's cap and trade policy is a conservative policy

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

It's the same here in Canada: conservatives originated this kind of policy but if anyone else does it they're suddenly completely against it. Never trust a conservative, I guess.