Wow it’s super cool how people who don’t understand global economics are running our economy now 🫠
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
128 points (95.7% liked)
News
36063 readers
3477 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They do, they're just lying about it.
This guy literally sourced all of his claims from a fake economist who was actually an anagram of his own name. I wish I was joking
This timeline is so fucking dumb 😓
This idiot probably thinks his grocery store is cheating him because he only buys food from them, and not the other way around.
This is why these "zero for zero" offers are going to go absolutely nowhere.
By their own admission, the administration is simply inventing these numbers for "tariffs applied against the US". What they are, in actually, is the US trade deficit against that country as a percentage.
But the thing is, you're never going see an even trade balance between the US and Vietnam while still having trade between those countries, because nothing made in the US is affordable to the average person living in Vietnam.
The only way to get that fictional "tariffs applied against the US" number down to zero is for Vietnam to stop all exports to the US. That means that a whole lot of clothes, electronics and other consumer goods will need to be made in the US instead of being made in Vietnam.
No version of this works out well for Vietnam, and even for the US it either involves prices increasing to reflect the higher average wages and cost of living in the US, or US wages decreasing to the point where you've basically got all these goods being made by utterly impoverished workers in American sweat shops.
I'm not going to say that American consumers exploiting poorer Vietnamese workers to subsidize their own cost of living is a morally good system, but it sure is one that was working pretty well for the average American consumer.
This, 100%. Some sane analysis of US idiocy.
Wait until he demands equality on things like chocolate and coffee.
"Uh sir, we can't grow cocoa in the US."
I think the countries that are making "deals" are just agreeing to buying a shitload of some market commodity like LNG. If you need energy anyway, it's a pretty easy way to adjust the "imbalance" obviously that won't work for every country.
Hey, isn't this the fuck that helped attempt to overturn the 2020 election and then ignored Congressional subpoenas and then went to prison for 4 months?
IT IS!!!!
I wonder what his expert source, Ron Varo thinks of this?
When the world finally understands that the only true way this administration believes they can be really fair is to provide all the goods you can crank out and expect nothing in return they will truly understand the depth of these people's understanding of reality
"Now adjust your laws to match ours. Now your pay...keep going..."
Why is VAT so hard to understand for otherwise literate Americans?
Probably because we don't really ever hear it explained
I consider myself pretty well read and I think I know what it means, but I'm making some assumptions. Could you explain it, and why it's a good solution here?
Google is your friend 🙄
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value-added_tax
Simply speaking it is the tax which cost of, could be claimed back on a every stage of the process, so only the difference between the purchasing/manufacturing price and selling price really attracts the tax.
If you buy something for a tenner and £2 vat (total £12) and sell for £15 and £3 vat (total £18) you are only liable for £1 tax, being the difference between the vat you charged and the vat you paid.
Man Google is nobody's friend
Okay, but like... What does that mean? What are the implications? I feel like I have to be missing something
Like, we do something similar with write-offs - that $12 you spent to buy the thing is subtracted from your tax burden
And the way we do taxes sucks. It's terrible and VAT sounds cleaner... But I don't see where that has any implications for international trade
But I don't see where that has any implications for international trade
Because there aren't any, it is only the perception.
If the final amount of vat is £20 for something which costs £100, for goods manufactured in the UK, these £20 have been collected "on the way" with the final retailer taking £20 from the end seller but paying let's say £15 to the wholesaler so only paying the taxman £5 (and wholesaler another £5 and manufacturer another £10 etc).
If however something has been imported by the retailer and the final vat is £20, the retailer will pay the entire £20 to the taxman. It is still the same £20 and makes no difference at all. But perception of Trump's halfwits may be different.
Wait... What? You say it has no implications for international trade, but you just said things produced in-country are taxed less...
It's doesn't sound like it's just perception, it's incentivizing production within the country. You're taxing imports fully, but making sure to tax the value added in county only once, which is huge
I'm not opposed to such a thing, I'm all about producing as locally as possible, but that seems like it's in the same ballpark as a tarrif. Am I missing something?
No, things produced in-country are taxed bit by bit along the production and transport chain, each time someone takes the thing and "adds value" to it. It's a value-added tax. Imported things are taxed all at once when imported. In the end it's the same amount of tax.
You could say imports are subject to a sales tax exactly equal to the value-added tax on domestic products. Sort of.
But like... Don't you think the home country(ies) taxed the production themselves at every stage themselves? And now it's coming into your country, and it's all taxed again. If it was made in your country, it would have been theoretically taxed at the final value once
So the lower value the import coming into the country, the lower the taxes on it. It's essentially a tax break for manufacturing in the country, no?
Honestly, I don't quite remember the details of what happens when you export an item. There won't be a sale to collect VAT on, but you'll have paid prices including VAT to your suppliers and there is something about tax credits. But at the end of the day it's a conceptually more complex sales tax but when you're working with it it's simple enough.
Read again 🤦
Ok I did... Someone else told me
You sell something for 20€, you put on VAT to that and that's the total price paid by the buyer.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills, I'm not even opposed to the idea of a VAT or a country incentivizing local production, but I feel like I'm being led in circles trying to understand what it actually is
I can definitely see the issues sane, adult and usually well educated EU officials encountered when they were trying to explain VAT to a bunch of cretins Trump employed.
you just said things produced in-country are taxed less...
I said no such thing
You sell something for 20€, you put on VAT to that and that's the total price paid by the buyer.
Navarro? the same Navarro who makes people up as experts who justify his own mediocre ideas?!
I was about to say, isn't that the Ron Vara guy?
Peter Navarro probably can’t reliably remember how to spell “tariff”
If anyone knows about cheating it is this admin