If you never changed your mind, you'd still have the mentality of a child...
Oh wait...
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
178 points (97.3% liked)
Canada
9467 readers
964 users here now
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
- Calgary (AB)
- Comox Valley (BC)
- Edmonton (AB)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Windsor (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- Montréal Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
💻 Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Buy Canadian
- Quebec Finance
- Churning Canada
🗣️ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
🍁 Social / Culture
- Ask a Canadian
- Bières Québec
- Canada Francais
- First Nations
- First Nations Languages
- Indigenous
- Inuit
- Logiciels libres au Québec
Rules
-
Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
The world would be a better place if people were celebrated for changing their minds if it was done for a good reason.
"I changed my mind because my views were unpopular" is a terrible reason, and true of many politicians.
But, "I changed my mind because I learned new things and had new experiences" should be admired. Also, "I changed my mind because the world changed" is another one that, at least sometimes, is good.
"I changed my mind because my views were unpopular" is a terrible reason, and true of many politicians.
This is one of the many reasons I think that anyone who wants political power should probably not have it.
I’ve always admired the parliamentary tradition of having to drag a new speaker of the house to their chair. Reluctance to have and to use power is such an important, admirable quality.
That said, I do believe our Canadian system is much better than the US one in one particular respect: parliamentary accountability. The leader of the executive, the prime minister, cannot remain in power if they lose the confidence of their own party. We witnessed this most recently with the resignation of Justin Trudeau after he had lost the confidence of his party.
In the US, the president has a lot more power simply because he is insulated from his own party by the separation of powers within the system. Trump is fully engaged in his destructive tariff campaign despite any opposition within his party because of this. The Republican Party, as bad as they are, are never as bad (or as good) as any individual within their ranks. This moderating effect does not extend to the White House due to the aforementioned insulation effect.
Definitely true of people who want power for the sake of having power. There are some who want power because it's what they need to make the improvements they think the world needs -- I'd put someone like Bernie Sanders in that list.
I'd put someone like Bernie Sanders in that list.
I'd argue that people like Bernie don't want power, but recognise it as the fastest way to get real and meaningful change. That, in my mind, is the real difference. If things weren't so fucked, for so long, I don't think Bernie would be in politics. Obviously this is purely a personal opinion, and we sadly don't live in that alternate universe. So we'll never know.
The problem is he is a fucking traitor, don't give a fuck about anything else that little runt has to say.
Save the CBC 🇨🇦✌️ on Bluesky
Pierre Poilievre once said politicians shouldn’t stay in office for life. That was 1999. It’s 2025—he’s still here, with the same angry rhetoric and no results. Now he wants to kill public media and silence journalists. What’s he so afraid of? #SaveTheCBC #CdnPoli #Canada
"Politics should not be a lifelong career, and elected officials should not be allowed to fix themselves in the halls of power of a nation... Therefore, I would institute a limit of two terms for members of Parliament" - Pierre Poilievre 1990
Link to original post.
What he meant was "other" politicians should not be be lifelong career politicians. He should be exempt of course because he is the "chosen one". He is Trump junior, let there be no doubt.
If you think the exact same way you thought 20 years ago, well you’ve wasted 20 years.
Bragging to Peterson that he never changes his mind is just stupid. Always talking about growth but admitting he has no interest in personal growth. What a broken human
Poilievre is not destined to lose, but he’s vulnerable because the feeling that he was destined to win has dissipated. That feeling was an artefact, one he crafted with real skill, using [Trudeau]'s many flaws to distract from some of his own. He’s facing a new opponent, who is new to campaigning and can jettison only so much of the Trudeau record. It’s hardly obvious who’ll win.
I'm not sure that Poilievre needed to distract from his own flaws - Canadians often vote against politicians. There were a lot of people feeling the cost of living polycrisis who wanted a change. I suspect the CPC could have run a rock as leader and beaten Trudeau.
Carney is a similar case because some of us are using him as the option to vote against Poilievre.
The cost of living polycrisis is estimated to be 45-70% caused by oil energy prices; yet very few provinces, and certainly not the feds, will do anything about oil dependency.
I'm all for extracting oil, since we're still a resource economy, but don't get high on your own supply!
I wish our high was our own supply; we sell crude to the US & China and buy petrol products back!
Up until quite recently, Canada was still a major exporter of asbestos. Wielding what some have called a massive, government sanctioned, corporate run propaganda campaign to continue brisk sales of the stuff. Let's not be doing the same with oil and gas. Asbestos has killed, and continues to kill, a very large number of people. Keeping on with the fossil fuel economy, even if all Canada does is export it, could already be set to kill literally everyone.
I would love to see oil go the way of asbestos and just be a problem for the next 100 years, but unless a lot of people get really cool with nuclear power and plastic alternatives, we're going to be using a decent amount of oil products for a while. I would rather avoid a situation like Germany, where we build a dozen coal plants because a foreign nation decided to stop playing nice.
Do you have a source for this? I struggle to see how most Canadians use enough oil products to account for anywhere near 45% of the cost of living.
Obviously there are secondary uses (shipping fuel), oil by-products (plastic), and people who still heat their homes with oil,, but it really doesn't seem like it could be approaching 45% Canada wide.
https://www.iisd.org/articles/deep-dive/fossil-fuels-drive-inflation-canada has 33%
https://www.falseprofits.ca/reports 43%
The higher numbers I had in my head were probably related to specific products/industries
Thanks for the links.
The IISD report is talking about a specific period (February 2021 to June 2022) where 33% of inflation can be attributed to oil prices. Outside of that 16 month period though (which was during the absolute peak of oil prices), oil would contribute much less to inflation.
I disagree with the methodology of the False Profits report. A big part of their 43% cost of living increase is attributed to interest rate hikes by BoC and associated job losses. They are also benchmarking to 2019 oil prices (to avoid the effects of the pandemic), but are ignoring the fact that oil prices had been artificially depressed by OPEC overproduction since 2014. If you look at historic oil prices, we're still significantly below the 2004-2014 inflation-adjusted average.
Overall though, I think both of these reports are looking at specific moments in time, and oil prices aren't nearly as impactful on our cost of living as they want us to believe.
It’s time to show him the door.
CANADA DOESNT NEED A SMALL pp
Then why has he stopped talking so much about defund the English CBC?
Doesn’t mean he changed his mind on cutting it.
'cause he's a liar too