this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
513 points (96.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

38893 readers
434 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mosscap@slrpnk.net 59 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I feel like The Onion should host their own PeerTube instance, just for the sake of using an incredibly cheeky domain name like ifuckinghatewatching.video or something cooler like onion.media or something

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

why not just tetrahedron.global?

[–] vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago

They should also have a Tor domain too, imagine cuandi2nfh81i4juqknsk18the.onion or something lol

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Infowars.video xD

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 62 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I've always wondered: When companies decide they need to look good for investors, it means to be clean and non-controversial. Why is this? Are investors old and out of touch or something?

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 56 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They have to look good to advertisers. And the megacorps of the world need to be sure their brands are not associated with anything "controversial" so they can appeal to as many Americans as possible.

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 26 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I believe the consensus is that the most profitable target market are children and young teens.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Which makes no sense! I know they don't have any bills, but they also have no income either! Is the tooth fairy and grandparents birthday money REALLY funding the ecconomy???

Oh.....no, that actually makes sense.

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 2 points 4 days ago

I suspect this is satire but in case its not. Its not the children themselves that are paying, its the parent that pays for whatever their critters demand.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

18-34. They have a little money from their first jobs, and they tend to spend it.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Basically they want to reach as wide as possible, so they tend to clear out or lock any controversy content behind something, even to the point of being ball-less and/or pro-fascism.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 7 points 5 days ago

Oh, they love controversial content. If they can put ads on it. Engagement and hatewatching are great for an ad business.

It just can't be formatted in a way advertisers want to avoid or regulators want to regulate. The result leads to very weird, very toxic patterns of content and nobody wants to fix it (or has any particularly effective ideas about how).

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Are investors old and out of touch or something?

Yes.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago

Investors tend to be extemely risk averse, so the slightest little thing might scare them off. Even if they decide to take the chance anyway, they still want it to be as clean as possible, to minimizing the risk.

Even the slightest improvement may increase the investment by millions, or even billions, of dollars, so it's worth the trouble.

[–] Iceman@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

First of all, who's your AnR? A mountain climber that plays and electric gitarr? But eh don't know the meaning of dope when he's looking for suit 'n tie rap that cleaner than a bar of soap.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

To be fair there is quite a bit of swearing in the video.

I can see how they wouldn't want it plastered on other websites that wouldn't warn about the foul language.

[–] TheSealStartedIt@feddit.org 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah… understandable. What really grinds my gears is that the whole world has to submit to these very American rules. The rest of the world doesn't believe you need to be an adult for swear words or a nipple, but we have to accept it.

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There are still cultural norms where you live. Probably even some that would be offensive in your country but not in the United States.

[–] TheSealStartedIt@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not denying that. That's kind of my point actually... It would be nice if Youtube, Xitter and co had to accept the law and cultural norms in my country. No ridiculously censored swearing, non-sexual nudity normalized, no Nazi salutes...

[–] transientpunk@sh.itjust.works 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sony is finally going to release me!? Freedom!!!

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Well...the title... And the content..

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Yeah, because "naughty" language is SO harmful to anyone under 18 and can't be freely found fucking everywhere that's not patrolled by conservative nincompoops 🙄

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well, I'd say "you get a warning and need to click past it once" is probably the right set of guardrails there, which is to say "as robust as a little bit of tape".

The real disincentives on Google services are downstream, where that impacts your placement to receive ads and monetize. I don't know how much The Onion cares about that, I'm guessing Youtube ads aren't a massive slice of their revenue pie, but for everybody else it's a significant carrot and stick thing to keep access to that sweet, sweet midroll ad money.

[–] Tyoda@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"you get a warning and need to click past it once" is probably the right set of guardrails there

You also have to sign in...

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, I may be too old to know this off the top of my head. They won't let you watch a "not for kids" embed unless you're logged in? Or is that for a separate "sensitive content" flag?

[–] Tyoda@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

I think it's separate, assigned automatically by scanning the subtitles and imagery, probably.

nincompoops

This, alone, deserves an updoot lol one of the best, most destructive insults imo

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 2 points 5 days ago

The fuck it is!

[–] maniel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You sure it's YouTube that does this or the onion guys set a flag because of a profanity in the title?

Either way, it's definitely YouTube that mandates annoying extra clicks to their frontend littered with ads and tracking cookies every time a video is age gated, which is the most infuriating part of this by far.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago

Tfw I don't have to know Esperanto