this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
260 points (98.5% liked)

politics

22873 readers
3758 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) plans to introduce a bill allowing Congress to block presidential tariffs, marking a rare GOP split with Trump amid market fallout.

His bill mirrors the Senate’s bipartisan Trade Review Act, requiring the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of new tariffs and gain approval within 60 days or face expiration.

With Trump able to veto and Republicans controlling Congress, passage is unlikely.

Meanwhile, House Democrats aim to force a vote ending Trump’s tariff-related national emergency, increasing pressure on vulnerable Republicans.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 102 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is either a schism deepening in the GOP ranks, or more likely, an act to appear better to the public while knowing nothing will come of it.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Did a little reading on don bacon, the representative mentioned.

He represents nebraska's 2nd district, a district where the majority voted for biden and harris. He is known for being a moderate republican who is noted for working bipartisanly. He retained his seat by a narrow 50.9%:49.1% margain.

Basically he's one of the most likely republicans to support something like this. And if viewed purely cynically, with the slim margin of victory, he has an incentive to introduce bills to nowhere like this use for the upcoming 2026 reelection campaign.

Until this bill gets cosponsors or goes for a floor vote, it doesn't indicate a breaking of ranks. He's the kind of republican who often goes against the party line.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

requiring the president to notify Congress

Oh, like he was "required" to do before cutting USAID? Cool.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Guess who would need to sign this bill to make it law. This republicans playing politics hoping voters won't notice they aren't doing jack shit to stop these tariffs. I hope they all burn and republican lose all their seats.

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know congress can overrule a presidential veto, right?

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Republicans have spent 8 years purging the party of all non-MAGA members. Congress struggles to do anything against the will of Trump. I can hardly imagine it would get a ⅔ majority to overturn a veto.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I tend to agree, but as you've seen, just yesterday, 100s of thousands of people came out against this. Republicans in Congress still have to get elected. Trump doesn't have to worry about that anymore, so he doesn't give a fuck. He'll play golf, spit nonsense, and do crazy old man shit.

Plus, follow the money. Trump has now fucked with wall street and they put up huge dollars to buy politicians on both sides. Looks at Elon, he is already saving grace to help his failing companies.

Fuck Trump btw

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think any Congress person who would vote against the tariffs might get a phone call.

Maybe the corporation, who's stock they hold, gets a tariff exemption if they vote this down?

Maybe, if they show their hand that they plan to vote in favor of this they get primaried.

All this to say, our current crop of politicians can't be trusted to do the right thing. Although, they can be trusted to do what's in their own self interest.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don’t know. Trump quite possibly just wrecked the economy and definitely made everyone poorer. Even if you don’t own stocks or have a 401(k), you’ll be poorer from the inflation and possibly unemployed. I could see Congressional Republicans being more worried about causing a depression and getting crushed in the next several elections than whether they have a primary opponent in 2026 or threats from a President with an approval rating in the tank. It’s already low but it might be 20% once the effects of his dumbfuck policies are impossible to ignore.

After the Smoot-Hawley Act exacerbated the Great Depression with idiotic tariffs, Democrats won every election and controlled the House, Senate, and White House from 1933 to 1947. In the 1936 presidential election, the Republican candidate got 8 electoral votes and FDR got 523.

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I really enjoy your optimism and historical accuracy. I hope you're correct and that's the direction things take.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I'm not good with the words.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Would be spicy if republicans in congress also allow the tariffs. What a midterm election that would be.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

So, someone finally made them read up what happened in 1932, and they shit their pants?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Hmm, I wonder if Bacon is feeling the heat from his constituents. He might be feeling like his career is cooked....

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago

Democrats should block it. They made their bed, let them sleep in it.