this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
662 points (97.4% liked)

News

36233 readers
2471 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed https://archive.is/x98FV

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 17 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Because now is the best time to be alive, ever. I could take you back 100, 200, 500, 1000, or 5000 years ago and things just get shittier and shittier the further back we go yet people kept having kids.

[–] ChadGPT2@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Not quite true. 20-30 years ago would be better than now. Slightly worse medical science is offset by everything else being farther up the collapse timeline.

I get our argument but I don’t think it’s accurate to overlook how terrible things have gotten in the past few decades just by taking the longview.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My support worker just got a new client and she said they bought their house for about 30k$ decades ago and are now sitting on millions.

Who the fuck can afford a house or kids or anything other than the bare minimum.

Costs keep going up, wages stay the same or often get smaller. What. The. Fuck.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I literally had to take a paycut to get hired by my former employer again.

Things are definitely not getting better than they were

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

They're clearly getting better for your employer

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

20-30 years ago would be better than now.

Tell that to anyone currently living with AIDS.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're kidding yourself, things may have seemed better 20 years ago but the economy was being bolstered by sub prime mortgage nonsense, it collapsed 2 years later and we've not had good times since.

[–] ChadGPT2@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How about climate change? 20 years ago there was hope. You want to introduce a kid into a world that is ending? Tell them hey, we made this world for you. You’ll fight in the water wars of 2040?

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You're saying things were better 20 years ago because there was false hope? By that logic 2020 must've been the best year ever because CO2 emissions actually dropped.

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And because we were 20 years further from the collapse.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It'll collapse or it won't collapse or we'll do something different, same as we always have. Pining for a rose tinted snapshot of 20 years ago or 30 years ago won't make things better. It's the same bullshit nostalgia fetishism the far right have for the 50s or 60s or whatever. Some things are worse, a lot of things are a lot better. All we can really do is support those we can support and make things better where we can.

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm not pining for anything, but being 20 years further from the end is objectively better. Don't lump me in with those fascist pigs, you dickbag. That's not even remotely the same thing.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 0 points 2 days ago

It's exactly the same.

[–] ChadGPT2@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

US life expectancy has also gone down during that time.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

How about climate change? 20 years ago there was hope

Twenty years ago, we invaded a country to steal it's oil while dismantling the nascent EV/Solar industry to protect fossil fuels

We are here today precisely because things were worse twenty years ago

You’ll fight in the water wars of 2040?

Better fighting to preserve water tomorrow than bloody your hands fighting for oil yesterday

[–] iglou@programming.dev 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, it's not. It's not a constant progression.

In most countries, the best time to be alive was the 60s-90s. Since then the world has been going downhill in everything that matters. Yes, sure, tech has evolved and all. But having the wonderful opportunity to be glued to a screen for half your life doesn't make it the best time to be alive.

People dont stop having kids because they suddenly hate the concept. It's in our nature to have kids. We don't want kids anymore because society has turned so hostile that it completely overruns our instinct to have kids.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The argument could be made that kids conceived right now will be the next richest generation as we have to be rapidly approaching the breaking point with the current second gilded age

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You literally have no way of knowing that though. I hope you're right, but that's just wishful thinking.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago

I mean choosing to believe things won't get any better is just pessimistic thinking, plus its counter-productive because if you don't believe in a better tomorrow how can you make today the first/next step towards a better tomorrow?

The best time to plan a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time is now. Why not be hopeful about the future and lay the groundwork to make some small improvement to your corner of the earth?

[–] terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Bro, deciding to continue living is also wishful thinking tho.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Because they had no means to have sex without kids.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago

Fair enough. Kids were also their retirement plan.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We've been able to pull out for a long time.

That said, what do you think is going to happen to our capacity to produce modern safe prophylactics at scale of we let guys like RFK Jr keep running things.

Technology isn't a given. It's a surplus benefit of a modern society. One that can degrade over time just as easily as it can accumulate.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I mean, my sex ex courses were mostly taught by conservatives, but we were always told the pull out method alone isn't going to get the job done. Though, I think it's supposed to be decently effective if the woman is also tracking her ovulation carefully and you abstain during ovulation.

Pretty sure the re-enslavement of women into perpetual baby makers is part of their plan.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Are you talking about trans men? Or are you talking about other types of slavery?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago

It's not even the best time to be alive during my lifetime