this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
256 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck AI

5728 readers
1010 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
256
xAI silent after Grok sexualized images of kids; dril mocks Grok’s “apology” (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 month ago by technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

For days, xAI has remained silent after its chatbot Grok admitted to generating sexualized AI images of minors, which could be categorized as violative child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) in the US.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Is no one going to question HOW and WHY Grok knows how to generate CSAM?

This is fucking disgusting and both the user and X should be held accountable.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I agree that it’s disgusting. To answer your question, it doesn’t know anything. It’s assigning probabilities based on its training data in order to create a response to a user prompt.

[–] DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Yes I know that it doesn't "know" anything, but where did it get that training data and why does it have CSAM training data? Or does it just generate regular porn and add a kid face?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)