this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
1567 points (98.8% liked)

Work Reform

14228 readers
112 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] senorseco@lemmy.today 14 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It's not a policy failure at all. It's a systemic feature. Capitalism is dog eat dog until only one dog remains. If you want to fix it you need a new economic system.

Thr government is supposed to enforce regulations in a capitalistic market like ours.

Amazon should have been torn a new asshole for some of the anti competitive things they've done for example, which would have maybe prevented or at least slowed what happened.

Google should have been broken up ages ago

And so on.

The rules and regulations are there, it's just become so corrupt they aren't being enforced.

[–] anugeshtu@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Hereeee we areeeee...

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If you want to fix it you need a new economic system.

We could try actually free markets with no benefits to anyone. By benefits here I mean tax breaks, government contracts and subsidies for companies.

[–] senorseco@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"We could try actually free markets with no benefits to anyone. By benefits here I mean tax breaks, government contracts and subsidies for companies."

I'm far from an expert but didn't we more or less try that during the industrial revolution? As I recall from old history books, it wasn't so great for the majority of citizens and the economy was an actual roller coaster ride.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

I don't think so. Protectionism was high, government-granted monopolies were typical. The British East India Company was the only company that was allowed trade with India and China from UK, for instance. The Dutch had something similary.

Perhaps later though in late 1800s it was more like you described.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think capitalism can work depending on two things

  1. The state must discipline and tax the capitalists constantly.

  2. There is a competing system that capitalism has to outperform.

[–] senorseco@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There is a competing system that capitalism has to outperform.

That's an interesting thought. Still trying to wrap my mind around how it might work.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

Basically like the cold war.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Public services.

E.g A well funded and not abused USPS.

Let them compete with that instead of crippling USPS in favor of the private options.

Edit: In Canada we had Air Canada, which was then sold off and privatized. We shouldn't have done that.

[–] Frumple@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, what actually ends up happening is the capitalists constantly pressure and influence the state to not tax them and not discipline them. It's hard for the state to say "no" to that kind of money.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

It’s especially hard for the state to say no because the state is run by the capitalists themselves. They are the same people.