senorseco

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] senorseco@lemmy.today 5 points 5 hours ago

But the ROI for ending hunger can't possibly match military spending, plus military spending provides governments with a clear path to choosing economic winners, so here we are.

[–] senorseco@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There is a competing system that capitalism has to outperform.

That's an interesting thought. Still trying to wrap my mind around how it might work.

[–] senorseco@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"We could try actually free markets with no benefits to anyone. By benefits here I mean tax breaks, government contracts and subsidies for companies."

I'm far from an expert but didn't we more or less try that during the industrial revolution? As I recall from old history books, it wasn't so great for the majority of citizens and the economy was an actual roller coaster ride.

[–] senorseco@lemmy.today 14 points 3 days ago (11 children)

It's not a policy failure at all. It's a systemic feature. Capitalism is dog eat dog until only one dog remains. If you want to fix it you need a new economic system.

[–] senorseco@lemmy.today 42 points 1 week ago

The Art of the Kneel

[–] senorseco@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

People will work much harder avoiding the thing than the time it takes to do the thing.