this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
-3 points (0.0% liked)

Canada

9514 readers
1002 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What a mystery this is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's amazing reading some of these statements. Spending increased every year but cuts are the problem holding people back, when taxes have increased dramatically since then too.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

when taxes have increased dramatically since then too

No they haven't:

https://policyalternatives.ca/publications/commentary/have-taxes-changed-all-much-over-past-half-century

In 1961, families paid 33.5% of their income on taxes, but by 1969 they were paying 39% and in 1974 they paid 43.4% of their income. So, if you compare the 2009 effective family tax rate to 1961, you will find a 25% increase, but you will only report a 7% increase since 1969 and an actual decrease since 1974.

(Note this analysis is circa 2010, but things haven't changed substantially since then aside from the post COVID inflation spike that's still subsiding).

But enjoy the alternate reality brought to you by your "friends" at the Fraser Institute™️.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Taxes don't tend to affect you when you make less than the tax cutoff.

But not having the social services those taxes used to fund suddenly means you don't get to eat dinner tomorrow, or you can't go to a family doctor because there aren't any available.

People like to complain about taxes, but taxes never made someone destitute.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The people in this country who make less than the tax cutoff are so few it doesn't even come into a discussion between actual adults on general policy. You clowns would impoverish everyone on the lie that that is what it takes to give a very few welfare.

"but taxes never made someone destitute." that there is what we call a "lie".

[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The people in this country who make less than the tax cutoff are so few it doesn’t even come into a discussion between actual adults on general policy.

Nearly one million working-age single adults are stuck in a cycle of “deep” poverty with an average annual income of $11,700