this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
201 points (99.0% liked)

Fediverse

35376 readers
291 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It seems that the dev burned out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This project has been discontinued and the repo archived. I am done with Lemmy, the Fediverse as a whole, and have no desire to continue developing for the platform or (especially) the demographic thereof.

Wow, what the heck happened? Do we know the dev's lemmy username for any clues?

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a combination of a burn out and a close friend (also moderator of the 30rock community on Dubvee) ending up in a coma, it seems.

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 day ago

Where are you seeing mention that the coma contributed to the choice to discontinue? I see in the !30rock@dubvee.org post that the community will be shut down despite the fact that the only mod is not able to even protest that decision or anything, but no other mention.

[–] Philamand@jlai.lu 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago

Thanks for that context.

The specific "burned out" is a common killer among folks that try this: community management

"Well, two years in, and I cannot say this place is any better, just differently bad if not worse. Too many people here seem to think that because it's not "corpo social media" that anything goes, and boy do some people really run with that."

I can't say I blame them. People can be horrible. Managing a community also means managing the worst of people. I had a former employer that did community management of a dating site. The level of mental trauma the front line workers endured was more than I could imagine. This is also why I completely understand instance admins that follow an aggressive blocking/banning approach. Beehaw put up tall walls and defederated aplenty. Blahaj.zone actively bans based upon user activity that is even on other unrelated instances. I can't fault either of these approaches because the alternative is dealing with the worst users en masse.

I hope that instance owner/manager gets some of that much deserved rest.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Apparently, reading the details on there - he might not shut it down.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sounds like someone wasn't prepared for the reality of human interaction on the internet.
I mean its completely fair to say that they don't want to deal with it, but also what did they expect?

[–] brot@feddit.org 36 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I totally have to disagree. Instance owners are attacked here on Lemmy for trying to keep their instance in line with the local laws where they live. You know, which they totally have to keep free of legal trouble that might cost them a lot of time, money or even put them into jail. It's not great when admins have to deal with utter idiots in their free time. Remember the whole Nicole fiasco where some poor girl was harassed via a spam attack? Remember that spam attack with the scat porn? All this hate going around with the war in the middle east? I can totally understand why someone burns out dealing with this crap in their free time. Come home from work after a hard day. Another scat spam attack you have to deal with. Another Hamas sympathizer calling you genocide lover because you deleted his propaganda. Someone else attacking you because you removed content that is illegal where you live and you hope that no authority saw it before you deleted it. Go to bed. Go to work. Repeat.

[–] horse@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Since you're on the same instance as me, I assume you are a mod/admin there. Let me use this opportunity to say thank you to you and all the other mods on feddit.org for helping to keep that place one of the most pleasant online spaces I've come across in my years on the internet. As far as I can tell from the outside you and the others are doing a great job.

[–] brot@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not a mod there, but thank you :)

[–] horse@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, I totally read that as you talking from experience :)

Or do you mod somewhere else?

[–] sk1nnym1ke@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Post your thank you message to

!main@feddit.org

I am sure feddit.org admins/mod and other relevant people will love this.

[–] hisao@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A bit offtopic, but why would anyone want to keep their instance in line with local laws? Aren't internet sites operating under jurisdiction of where they are hosted? Or is it just some coincidence that those people decided to host their stuff at datacenters at their local proximity? When I'm choosing hosting the first thing I think about: "hmmm I shouldn't host in country where I live because I don't want to ever have any problem with local authorities, and if I host elsewhere authorities there won't be able to reach me physically so the worst thing that could happen is the site gets shut down".

[–] brot@feddit.org 0 points 16 hours ago

There are multiple reasons: If you want to fund your instance by donations, you need to be able to act under your real name. You might get away with a totally anonymous instance which you are funding via cryptodonations and which you are hosting at a provider who really does not care about KYC, but that is also illegal in many jurisdictions. There is totally a case for a lemmy instance admin to be known publically, to be able to interact with the community in person, to be able to go to meetups or to be able to give talks at conventions.

And if you are not living in some country with totally crazy politics, most local laws are totally fine. Do not post hardcore pornography. Do not spread hatred or calls for murder and hate speach. Keep the piracy a little bit less obvious. Don't allow hardcore pornography and have a solid process to keep child porn from your platform. That might be different if you're living in Iran, Saudi-Arabia or Afghanistan, but in a western country it is totally ok to be in line with local laws.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

We arent really in disagreement tho. I am absolutely empathetic with their situation and their burnout. Im just saying they should have seen it coming. Those two things arent contradictory. I just find it odd how one can invest so much time into a public project, without being aware of the realities of having to moderate it. Im thankful for the people that host instances, but i will never do it, because i know how much of a pain it is.

[–] brot@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

Not sure if "they should have seen it coming" really is the way to think about this. Yes, moderation is hard. Yes, it makes sense to build a team doing moderation. But let's be honest, Lemmy is insaner than other forums due to its federated structure.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 day ago

If you don’t want to be called a genocide lover, then don’t defend a genocide and then double down on it.

Easy.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

but also what did they expect?

Can I ask you what the worst examples of community management looks like? As in, what do you believe would be the worst part of the job?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When you moderate a platform that the public is free to upload anything to, you will see everything. From insults to threats to gore to CSAM. Thats how the internet is. That is the worst part in my opinion, because you cant just look away, but actually have to deal with it.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I managed a forum for a decade, and seen everything except CSAM. You just delete it.

It was on a .tk domain and it got suspended for content violations anyway

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree with you. However, I don't think most people understand that. For most folks they haven't been exposed to the most mentally darkest souls among us.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

thats why the bigger platforms resorted to using ai overmoderation to deal with these.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This really is a complicated problem, but if the fediverse wants to grow without relying on slave labor for moderation like Meta and the rest, then we have to find ways to lighten the load on moderators. Thats why creating transparent pre moderation tools like the image scanners used by many fediverse instances is so important.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thats why creating transparent pre moderation tools like the image scanners used by many fediverse instances is so important.

Are there any moderation tool projects going on right now one could throw a few bucks at to support it?

This one is a very basic CSAM scanner that goes through lemmy image storage and just deletes stuff it deems bad. https://github.com/db0/fedi-safety I havent tried it tho, so i cant attest to its quality.

Im sure there are tools made for mastodon too, since it has a lot more users.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No idea, but it's not an active instance so idk what happened.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

He's sick of the morons on Lemmy.