this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
646 points (99.4% liked)

News

28609 readers
3374 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“It’s very ‘Handmaid’s Tale’-esque,” one official said.

The Trump administration has ordered State Department employees to report on any instances of coworkers displaying “anti-Christian bias” as part of its effort to implement a sweeping new executive order on supporting employees of Christian faith working in the federal government.

The department, according to a copy of an internal cable obtained by POLITICO, will work with an administration-wide task force to collect information “involving anti-religious bias during the last presidential administration” and will collect examples of anti-Christian bias through anonymous employee report forms.

The cable was sent out to embassies around the world under Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s name. The instructions also were released in a department-wide notice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 219 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Do they mean like when their leadership is revoking student visas, going Leviticus 19:34 states: "You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself".

[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Leviticus is from the Jewish part, though, and is therefore inherently less valuable to Christians unless there's anything in there about murdering gays or treating women like property.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man, these guys would love Islam.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I can hear it now

NOOOOOOO ALLAH BAD NO SUCH THING AS ALLAH NOOOOOOO

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And what about the book of James which says the same thing in different words?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Bible says everything if you look hard enough. There's no point in argumenting this way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Numbers 5:11 to 5:31 uh, fairly clearly explains that if a woman is suspected to be pregnant by 'not her husband', she is to undergo a ritual and drink a potion which will cause an abortion/miscarriage.

https://biblia.com/bible/esv/numbers/5/11-31

ESV uses a ... too literal translation to result into 'her thigh will fall away'...

https://biblia.com/bible/niv2011/numbers/5/11-31

But the NIV translators are capable of understanding context dependent modifiers and just directly uses 'miscarry'.

https://biblia.com/bible/nlt/numbers/5/11-31

NLT ends up with 'womb will shrivel/shrink'.

https://biblia.com/bible/nkjv/numbers/5/11-31

NKJ also goes for a very, word by word literal approach (what a surprise) and says 'thigh will rot'.

...

So yeah, there you go, anytime you run into a bible thumper who proclaims that the ten commandments are the basis of western civilization, show them that the old testament also very clearly and explicitly ... not just condones, but mandates abortion in certain circumstances.

If they then say that we are under the new covenant, throw this at them:

https://biblehub.com/matthew/5-18.htm

Matthew 5:18

Jesus, the man himself, says to follow the Law (ie, the old testament, or at the very least the first 5 books, the torah, which includes the entire book of numbers) exactly, precisely, to the letter, to the 'jot and tittle'.

... Oh but also the Bible is inerrant and never contradicts itself, which must mean the old and new covenant have perfect agreement and never contradict, and are therefore identical, right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

Exactly. People who want to believe certain things will find them in the Bible and will disregard the rest that's also written there. Belief is, unfortunately, irrational.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I dunno about that, but there is a bit in there about burning bulls testicles to appease the lord god

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I tried that, it works every time. The only problem is getting the bull's testicles. They object to it surprisingly strongly. Quite challenging. The Good Book offers no warnings or advice about that part.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Protip: Remove them from the bull before burning them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

the bull might not like that either though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a good tip, I'll give that a try.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No the testicles are on the other end.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I'm confused, Ive been kicked in the head a few times, as you can imagine.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Imagine being a supreme being, creator or the entire universe and everything in it, all life, the fusion in the stars, supermassive black holes sucking matter into them, dust clouds across the cosmos, and yet still for some reason being impressed by someone burning bovine gonads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

At one point he cursed the Phillistines with hemorrhoids until they made him some golden ones.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Musk has how much money and influence, but rages when people say a mean thing online. I see God as no different.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Big Skydaddy loves him some mountain oysters.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I understood that reference! 👌

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

so which part did jesus read then?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

He was probably heavily influenced by the Essenes, so stuff very similar to the Dead Sea Scrollls.

I think the book of Tobit was also influential to historical Jesus’s thought, and maybe even 1 Enoch. If he didn’t read those texts himself, I think at least you can make the argument that he was influenced by the kinds of thoughts/movements those texts were associated with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Authors don't read their own books.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

um. ok. you’re clearly a theological scholar.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

and you shall love him as yourself

Wait, does this mean I'll have to jack off strangers?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Well, anything else just wouldn't be Christian, you know. I'd hate to have to report you..

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Well, they also don't like the natives, or themselves, so honestly good work keeping true to the book. 🙃