News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
From the US Constitution:
"Article I, Section 10, Clause 2:
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress." source
I won't call you Ted, because I know how much you hate people forcing preferred names. Rafael Cruz, you have the power granted to you by the US Constitution to stop the trump tariffs. You don't need to ask trump. The power is yours. Use it!
How Congress delegates its tariff powers to the president
According to the Congressional Research Service, there are six statutory provisions currently in place that control how the president and the executive branch can use tariffs. Three provisions require federal agency investigations before a tariff can be imposed. The other provisions do not require an investigation before actions are taken.
...
Among the three provisions that allow the president to act on his own to impose tariffs without an investigation, only one has ever been used: the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. The act allows the president to declare an emergency under the National Emergency Act (NEA) and then use his extensive economic powers to regulate or prohibit imports. The CRS says that President Trump was the first chief executive to use this act in February 2025, when he announced tariffs on Canada, China, and Mexico. The emergency stated by the president can be terminated at this request, or by a joint resolution of Congress.
Those Acts are laws written by Congress. Congress also has the power to write new laws amending or removing the previous ones. Again, its still in Rafael's (and his coworkers) hands to stop trump's tariffs.
Sure. With a majority in two houses and a signature from the President. Or a supermajority, in the event they need to override a veto.
A big part of the problem is that Cruz's allies still think the tariffs are a good idea. Or, at least, they think their political futures are predicated on supporting Trump's tariffs, because Trump commands the party middle-management that guarantees them their elevated positions. They won't take away Trump's authority, because it doesn't benefit them to do so.
This isn't strictly a Trump problem. It is the problem of governing a nation of 330M people with a captured cartel of 438 cronies of business goons.
I don't disagree, but Cruz is being disingenuous that he doesn't have a pathway. He could introduce legislation removing trump's tariff powers. Even if it doesn't pass, he could still force his colleagues to vote on the record to keep the tariffs in place.
Individually, he's got as much say as Bernie Sanders or Cory Booker.
He didn't even have to do that much. Just sign on to existing legislation. Cruz chickened out on that vote and left the Kentucky Chucklefucks, Collins, and Murkowski to do the heavy lifting. But it's DOA in the House, so even this seems perfunctory.
Dude's a total slimeball and a deceitful POS, without a doubt. But with Schumer rolling over on general spending bills, he's not even the first Senator in the line of people I'm angry at.