this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
1 points (66.7% liked)

Science Memes

17917 readers
1452 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This implies that there's some sort of evolutionary advantage to getting sloppy seconds. I don't know how I feel about that.

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We are animals, monogamy is not a part of humanity like it is in penguins.
Our penises reshaped over millenia of orgies just to get all the other guys cum out. We are sluts of the animal world, like rabbits

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

when you realize this it makes a lot more sense how fucked up the world is, of course everyone's going to be miserable when they're evolved to have sex at least 3 times per day with 5 different people and yet things look like they do!

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think it says we're better off than other animals. Human women would fuck multiple men, the men competed to have better dicks for extracting his cum and replace it with yours

Other animals fought for the chance to mate, it seemed like humans shared

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

i mean yeah evolutionarily we have a better setup, but i'm talking about how things are right now.
right now most people are constantly stressed out and feeling like absolute dogshit, and it's no wonder when we're all so miserably isolated. Humans are absurdly social creatures, we need contact to survive, and yet society is built in a way that makes it extremely difficult.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, so that's why it's such a turn on, it's evolutionary advantage!

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Fucking a woman after someone else is so gay /s

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If being gay (not bi) is so obviously an evolutionary disadvantage, how does it exist in humans and animals in statistically significant numbers?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because we like it and liking things is reason to live.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter how long you live if you have no offspring. It feels like, statistically, gay people really shouldn't exist. Yet here we are.

Hi, it's me, the strangely existing gay person!

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Species survive not just as individuals, but as groups.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Well, do you think women consent was at thing back in the early days of homo sapiens?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

i mean yeah, if your tribe goes around raping other tribes' women that's going to get everyone you know and love put on the "kill on sight" list.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Look at how you're sorting things, this comment you're replying to is 7 months old

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

bro 7 months is fucking nothing on the internet, people reply to 7 year old comments all the time. This is a forum not a chat

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry bro but this is a Reddit like platform, not an old school forum, people don't care about 7 months old posts... Hell they don't care about a 2 days old post.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok what’s happening, it’s the second reply to this 7 months old comment that I get this week

and yet you had to say this, so clearly people do care about old posts, and you're the odd one out.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The only reason being that you resurrected the conversation for them by replying to me.

The vast majority sorts by "all top 6h" so no, I'm not the odd one out and you'll notice it if you start paying attention to the age of the comments you're replying to.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

well then tough shit i guess, you'll just have to accept that no one else gives a shit what you think.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

And no one gives a shit about people who reply to 7 months old comments.

Have a good life.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yes I do. Do I think every sex was consensual? No. Do I think at least 1% of women had at one point consented to sex? Yes.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

nah poligamy were just the norm

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Polyamory is the word you're looking for polygamy assumes marriage

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

However "-amory" implies romantic relationships. We're talking sexual interactions, not love.

When discussing animal social behaviours, "polygamy" is used.

https://www.britannica.com/science/polygamy-animal-behavior

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh, i didn't knew that thanks

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

If you meant a man had several female partners, you had the right word. Polyamory doesn't care whether the person in charge is male or female. Polygamy means a man had many women

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Consider that one of our two closest ape relatives is the bonobo. They settle arguments with head jobs, ask for favours the same way

We're clearly not as bad as ducks

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok what's happening, it's the second reply to this 7 months old comment that I get this week

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

I sort by new comments, so this thread would have appeared in my feed because that previous person commented in it

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

It implies that there were enough guys getting sloppy seconds for dick shape to give a reproductive advantage.

While it could have been from a lot of free love in the ancient past, I suspect it's more likely much darker than that and the evolution of cuckolds is intertwined.