this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
-4 points (0.0% liked)

Conservative

572 readers
45 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

"Frame Trunp" lol

It's hard not to feel like most of his fanboys knew nothing about him before he ran for president. He's a lifelong conman and proud of it. Did no one read his book? I did in the 90s and could tell this dude is the Steven Seagal of business.

Why defend this guy? There are plenty of conservative politicians who aren't total pieces of shit with awful track records. It's surreal that you elected a reality TV star to the highest office in the country and now you want to do it again.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

@glimse @BearOfaTime Let's not pretend that the #MSM would villainize any conservative republican who won the #GOP nomination. If #MarcoRubio, #RandPaul, #BenCarson, heck anyone other than #JohnKasich or #JebBush would have won, you'd be saying the exact same thing today about that person.

Not to say that #Trump is 100% innocent BTW, if #JoeBiden should be prosecuted for illegally having classified documents, so should #Trump. It goes both ways.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

First off, what's up with all the hashtags? Your comment looks ridiculous and it's harder to read with links every other word.

Second, MSM would not be villainizing other candidates to this degree because Trump IS a villain. He's the poster child for scummy businessmen...a caricature, really. I would not be saying the same things because I've been well aware of what a selfish asshole Trump is for 20 years...and he's only gotten worse. Did you even read Art of the Deal? He's an embarrassment to the country beyond his status as a disgraced politician.

You're also forgetting that Biden handed those documents over willingly and without delay whereas Trump claimed he didn't have them and then, when pressured, admitted he did have them but claimed he was allowed to. This isn't even getting into the likelyhood that he was selling said documents to foreign actors. Now there's mounting evidence that he tried to cover it all up. That's your man? That's who you think should run the country?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

@glimse

> MSM would not be villainizing other candidates to this degree because Trump IS a villain.

You're just parroting #MSM talking points here, not proving that I'm wrong.

> He’s the poster child for scummy businessmen…a caricature, really. I would not be saying the same things because I’ve been well aware of what a selfish asshole Trump is for 20 years…and he’s only gotten worse.

Then why was he so well liked while he was a businessman? Nobody hated him until the #MSM criticized him.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not parroting shit. Like I said, I've been following Trump's shady dealings for 20 years. Clearly you haven't.

He's well-liked among two groups: the ultrarich because he makes them money with his schemes and the wannabe rich because they are willing to do anything to get ahead. He was never well-liked by other groups.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

@glimse

> He’s well-liked among two groups: the ultrarich because he makes them money with his schemes and the wannabe rich because they are willing to do anything to get ahead. He was never well-liked by other groups.

Do you have a source for this?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (5 children)

@realcaseyrollins @glimse

As far as I can tell, Trump is popular among a range of social classes but also captured the college-educated conservative vote.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A source for what exactly? Public opinion?

You don't have to @ me every time.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@glimse Yes. If it was public, you should be able to find, say three instances of that opinion being espoused.

Unless it was like a super secret public opinion that nobody said out loud?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@realcaseyrollins @glimse

Like... the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Ziyon?!!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@amerika @glimse Pretty sure that was pretty popular in #Russia, and served as the origins for the modern antisemitic conspiracy theories we see today.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're talking to a white supremicist.

Their site makes it clear.

That's the reason they're citing a racist conspiracy theory.

The mods won't ban him though, because that's the kind of user they wish to court.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (6 children)

@LookBehindYouNowAndThen I'm not sure if he's a supremacist, more likely a racial separatist/"race realist". Wouldn't be shocked if he's racist, but yeah #TheProtocolsOfTheEldersOfZion is quite the deep cut, and his alt-right views are probably the only way he even knows what that is (I only know what that is when I started researching the origins of the #Israel v. #Palestine conflict and it came up as I was skimming #Wikipedia)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I don't make excuses for white supremicists.

Guess you do.

How the fuck is a "racial separatist" not a racist?

Gotta love how this community puts the full depravity of conservatism on display for everyone.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

@LookBehindYouNowAndThen

> I don’t make excuses for racists.

I don't either! I do try to understand them though. They walk among us, after all.

> How the fuck is a “racial separatist” not a racist?

They're still racist; the difference is that a white supremacist thinks that white people are better than other people, and racial separatists think that all races are equal, but should be segregated from each other.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Funny how you're more charitable to this white supremicist's views than you are for anyone to your left.

Last time we were having a discussion you misrepresented my views with every reply, but you've really dialed in the various flavors of racist, because those nuances are so important to understand.

Conservatives will ally with racists and fascists before they compromise with a lib.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@LookBehindYouNowAndThen

> Funny how you’re more charitable to this white supremicist’s views than you are for anyone to your left.

This is an interesting take. You must not know me very well.

Have you seen my political commentary blacklist of bad faith actors? It's mostly people on the right.

https://social.teci.world/objects/a591d729-7dd8-4374-b9c7-a31b9f5e56e9

> Last time we were having a discussion you misrepresented my views with every reply

Which convo was this?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

@LookBehindYouNowAndThen

> Conservatives will ally with racists and fascists before they compromise with a lib.

Part of me wonders if I'm even a #Conservative anymore. I hate big government and a lot of them don't, and the #MAGA people are pretty embarrassing to boot.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

Conservatism is a philosophy, not a party. We are realists, the Left are anti-realists.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (11 children)

@amerika @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

> Conservatism is a philosophy

Fair enough; Conservatism is pretty broad so it can be as libertarian as it can be fascist.

I care too much about supporting small government and principles over people to want to associate too closely with the modern right, who I feel is increasingly okay with authoritarianism (look at their support of #DeSantis for example)

> We are realists, the Left are anti-realists.

That's kind of a childish way to view things.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

For me, getting away from Wikipedia is important. It's enemy propaganda. Britannica does a lot better for quality information anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen god thought the same thing wen he did tower of babel. mixing races is no good

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

@glimse

> You’re also forgetting that Biden handed those documents over willingly and without delay whereas Trump claimed he didn’t have them and then, when pressured, admitted he did have them but claimed he was allowed to.

So? The law doesn't care; the criminal activity is having the documents, not refusing to return them or lying about having them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you think that Trump is on trial just because he had the documents at all, you clearly are following the case about as much as Trump's business history...as in... not paying attention at all.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

@glimse

> If you think that Trump is on trial just because he had the documents at all

...I don't? He's on trial for many things.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

@glimse

> That’s your man?

No, I've been criticizing #Trump during the entire #GOP presidential nomination process

> That’s who you think should run the country?

Not really, but he's way better than #JoeBiden