this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2026
425 points (97.1% liked)

politics

31245 readers
2153 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Insiders, including at centrist think tank Third Way, are cautioning Democratic candidates against echoing Republican talking points on trans rights.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 26 points 2 days ago (5 children)

What fucking "trans issues"?

The world is burning. Children are dying. No one can afford anything.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

The genocide campaign I'd reckon, if I were a reckonin' man.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Billionaires are desperate for any kind of distraction from progressive fiscal policy.

Republicans need a wedge issue and neoliberals do too so they can agree with Republicans on the shit people care about but still appear better.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A lot of us keep saying this: every time the word "trans" is mentioned in political debate, you just go "what the actual hell are you talking about when none of us can afford food or medical care?"

Trans rights, while morally correct, are a losing issue politically right now but the solution isn't to hammer on them, it's to completely ignore the narrative and redirect it to something real, that people actually care about (it's the economy, stupid!)

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trans issues are real and people do actually care about them. The whole point of the article is that hating on trans people is not a winning strategy, not that trans rights is a losing issue.

I get recommending redirecting the conversation, but trans people are losing their rights, and that is a real problem.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No you half wits, people can't afford basic nesesitys, can you guess who that also affects TRANS PEOPLE. This is what I don't understand about this convo, it affects them as well. I'll be honest though, if your trans in America, move. It's not a safe place it it could only be 2-6 years from now that your in more danger again.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Hate fuels conservatives. They're trying to steer them using the worst possible policies

[–] Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The propaganda that too many people still fall for, so, yes, maga should stop using it and focus on human first policies to reduce costs and increase wages and benefits. Dems support liberty and justice for all and don't put trans rights above other issues as the brainwashing says. No politician is perfect on these issues, but some support helpful policies for us more than others. If they ever get enough time and large enough majority to pass big things it would be nice, but can't blame them for the swings that easily destroy progress that took time to build. Maybe the dnc powers try to limit their majority so they can't to do what we want? I hope not, but candidates not bought by big money and promote healthy ways should serve us better, if enough ever win at once to do much, hmm.