this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2026
159 points (76.1% liked)

pics

29934 readers
729 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think that might be the most American photographer ever taken.

What is the point in building teeny tiny homes if they're going to be placed six feet apart and have no private space. The whole point of a small compact house is it leaves space over for communal stuff. This feels like an American visited Europe and completely failed grasp the point.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

The whole point of a small compact house is it leaves space over for communal stuff.

What? The whole point is saving money, and smaller land is cheaper...

[–] PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works 8 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

You know, we could make them even cheaper by cramming them so close they share walls and then stacking them on top of each other. And because they're all together, we can call them apartments.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Now there's an idea!

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If that is so, what is the point of all that unusable wasted space around thise buildings, other than law requiring it for some randomreasons?

Without that, those buildings could either have high quality outside space that could be used for gardening or a terrace or the area could be reduced.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

The point is for the developer to capitalize on the hype and fomo. Yes, most likely just enough space to meet property setbacks and utility easement requirements.

They squeeze the most "houses" in the lot as they can.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they are in Texas then it's 43C outside and 95% humidity, so you don't go outside for anything if you don't have to.

Also these are just apartments that are actually apart. So, basically just really inefficient apartments.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Gardening? Do you know the concept?

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

You know full well the only garden allowed by any HOA here is a lawn.