PuddleOfKittens

joined 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

And basically did the Action RPG equivilent of dying to the first Goomba in Super Mario Bros.’ World 1-1 at a live convention where your speedrunning skills are the main attraction

I'm pretty sure the current standard is playing Halo and fumbling so badly you have to turn the difficulty down from Legendary to Normal, and missing your target time by over an hour (see: the Cody Miller Halo GDQ speedrun).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Well, we all knew this was coming. "AI will be powered by renewables and fund the green transition!" no, it'll be powered by whatever meets their business needs, and they're running high-end electronics which means they'll be running 24/7.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Specifically, tax them by (weight/axle)^4 * speed^2. You'll notice that a 2ton car costs 16x as much as a 1ton car.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I want cities to be more like Venice or Florence or basically any city built before the 1780s. They worked just fine. There are places like that in the city I live in, but they're horrifically expensive because it's literally illegal to build more of them.

And to be clear, I'm not saying "I want to put homeless people in these places", I'm saying "I want to live in these places, and lots of others do to so stop making them fucking illegal to build more of."

https://www.andrewalexanderprice.com/blog20131204.php

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Razors and blades - every console game has a, IIRC, ~$5 platform holder fee, which goes to Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo. So if you buy a Playstation at-cost and then buy 5 games, then Sony makes ~$25 in profit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

They're literally building bunkers though. The bunkers are for literally going and hiding in a hole like Saddam Hussein.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Building more housing helps, but building new housing will remain expensive for as long as land is expensive, so it's vital that we avoid wasting land. Which means density.

Some people read "density" and think "ah, taller buildings!", but that's only half the picture - you can save tremendous amounts of space by improving horizontal density - look at how dense OP's one storey housing is, by shrinking the houses, and by ditching the front yard and dedicated sidewalks.

Except, most of the space is still empty! Those streets are oversized (take a look at traditional cities, most streets are under 20ft wide (6m wide) wall-to-wall), and the houses all have gaps next to them which look big enough to fit (or almost fit) another house. So you could easily more-than-double the density without even going up, assuming the housing isn't car-centric (I'm guessing those empty spots might be car parks, and the streets are overly wide because they're for cars).

If this sounds nitpicky, it's not: building one-storey houses is dirt cheap; imagine trying to make a portable two-storey tent. It even makes it realistically possible to remove developers from the equation, without too much going horribly wrong. It just needs to be efficient with the land it uses.

240sqft = 22.3sqm

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you insulate against noise properly, you won't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Here's some better advice for protestors/saboteurs: DO NOT CONFESS TO YOUR CRIMES ON SOCIAL MEDIA

You hit abandoned buildings and street signs? Ohhhh no sirree, SOME UNKNOWN PERSON hit abandoned buildings and street signs. No idea who it was. Not one clue.

view more: next ›