this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
524 points (97.0% liked)

Brand New Sentence

434 readers
1 users here now

Showcasing the brazen and nouveau in English communication.

  1. Be cool to each other and follow the lemmy.today instance rules.
  2. Post title must be the sentence, or relevant portion of the sentence if it's very long.
  3. Link for context if possible.
  4. Tag NSFW where applicable.
  5. This instance has no rules against calls to violence, please don't report general wishes for violence. Direct implications of harm (i.e. I will shoot x person in the head) will be moderated at our discretion.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

Vegans: Why does no one like us?

Also Vegans: (Always "on" and going out of their way to insert themselves into situations so they can act exactly like that).

Yes I know not all vegans are like that but I also never see them telling the militant ones to STFU and stop making them al look bad.

[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Do you expect vegans to mind control other vegans or something? Militant people are usually not the ones who listen when you ask them to shut up.

[–] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't mind control a perk you can select on a vegan Fallout run?

[–] Chaf@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

How does not eating dairy products give you psychic powers?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFCAcQxmYDI

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Militant" is being kind. "Belligerent" is closer to the experience.

[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And belligerent types are even less likely to listen when you ask them to stop. That's exactly my point.

[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

It's so nice to agree 😁

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

It's as annoying as someone bragging about big ol' raw steaks and ribs and such, like they have been doing in the Texas political stuff lately. Both as a smear ("look at this pussy non-Texan!") and a defense ("I do love ribs, I really do!") and it all comes across the same way to me.

Truthfully, neither types of statements personally bother me, but given everything we know about the climate, economics, etc., the vegans are better and easier to defend.

[–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you think something is a moral emergency, you're going to be more hysterical about it. It's like saying "democrats need to stop being so militant about climate change and tell others who are to stop." You can drive a hummer and fly a private jet everywhere as a lifestyle choice, but people can and should call you out for it.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But the point is that calling out seems to make people double down more often than agree and change.

[–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well yeah I mean if you're the minority I agree. I generally think people who are too emotionally invested are generally the worst at convincing people. I'm just giving a reason why they're so aggressive and angry.

I see the same in some people arguing for lgbtq+ rights and I don't think they're being effective(maybe even damaging), but I get why they're so upset about it.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Oh yeah, it's absolutely understandable. But also frustrating because division tactics only need to point out things to be angry about and then people will get angry about them (might have already been angry about them but now the topic is on their mind) and yell or lecture people about it which feeds that division and makes it less likely they'll ever get on the same page. Especially when the offending side was trying to act in good faith but gets accused of just being an enemy or bad person.

Shame only works when the person decides on their own they should feel shame, otherwise the best you can hope for is platitudes while they secretly want to see you fall (or otherwise get out from under your sphere of influence) so they can stop pretending to care about that thing. Average case would be an argument that leads nowhere, which is what usually happens online since no one has any real power over others, other than mods/admins who can only ban.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I don't buy meat, but I'll eat it if it's given to me. It's a treat to me, and I savour it when it happens. The downside is that vegetarians, vegans, and meat eaters all hate me 😂

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

[Jokingly] That just sounds like you're a meat mooch.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 2 months ago

oppertunistic carnivore

[–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

you are doing better than 98% of people so I think vegans and vegetarians would be extremely happy with that (I'm "vegan" but will eat stuff thats going in the trash otherwise)

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Vegetarians are happy at first, until they see me just devour a whole chicken once a month, then they give me the side eye lol. Vegans don't like that I eat dairy and eggs. Carnivores get annoyed when I have a meal of "rabbit food". I seem to annoy everyone 😂

I dunno, to me it's called having a varied diet and it's normal. Where I grew up, that's what you ate. Mostly plants, dairy from the cows/goats/sheep, eggs from the chickens. Then sometimes, the village would slaughter a goat, and you had a party and ate as much meat as you could because it doesn't preserve well. The animals were treated with respect, but we also ate them sometimes. It doesn't have to be mutually exclusive.

Food is a weird thing, I find people care a lot about what I eat for some reason. It feels like I'm not following some unspoken rules or something

[–] xep@discuss.online 3 points 2 months ago

I don't think anyone in the carnivore space would be annoyed at you eating what you choose to eat. If you're healthy, why would it bother anyone?

[–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

rabbit food one is my favorite lol

I think if you're getting eggs / milk / anything from animals who aren't mistreated, that's like 99% of the way to being vegan. For eating a slaughtered animal, if it had a good life that's like 80% of the way to being vegan :p

Food is extremely important to a lot of people, it's something to look forward to after a long day, a place where they can talk to people, a time when they can relax and feel calm. Anything that changes that can be scary for people, which is why I just say reduce what you can, don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

My wife's been collecting food allergies like Pokemon these last few months, so I have a feeling I'll be joining you on a similar diet!

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Regular vegetarians have tried to tell them to tone it down, it just makes them more radical.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

God, if only those people who want to save the planet shut the fuck up about it! How about you save the planet without annoying me??

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Whilst I understand your argument, if a strategy isn't working, pursuing it becomes more of a personal identity thing than a commitment to an objective.

[–] toomanypancakes@crazypeople.online -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"Don't be mean to the meat eaters in case they might consider stopping someday" isn't a very effective strategy at getting people to think about what they're supporting though.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 27 points 2 months ago

Neither is being mean, as it turns out.

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Lol. What a childish take. How about, "Worry about yourself and your own problems. If it doesn't hurt you, you can't tell people what to do, and you shouldn't want to either. If they ask, that's one thing. But jumping on your soapbox every chance you get to preach the virtues of veganism is the same energy as religious zealots who try to recruit everyone they speak to. Nobody wants to be around that all the time. Don't be that person."

[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago

Keeping your head down, worrying only about your own problems is exactly what the Epstein class wants out of you. Don't ask, don't question, don't push, just lie down and take it.

[–] toomanypancakes@crazypeople.online 12 points 2 months ago

"Don't advocate for others ever", got it.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website -5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do-gooder_derogation

It's your subconscious telling you they're right and trying to protect your ego.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Nah, I will readily admit that vegans are morally correct, that I am weak for being unable to commit fully, and also that the evangelism is often cringe and counterproductive.

[–] numpad@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

The weakness is not daring to fully understand how vegans are morally correct. I ate animals for 34 years and was too weak to face the reality of their situation.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

a nonzero amount of this is literally astroturfing to make vegans look bad, if this makes you dislike vegans in general you're kinda just falling for meat industry propaganda.

I'm not a vegan but i don't eat red meat, so i guess this doesn't count as me telling militant """""vegans""""" to stfu, but whatever.