this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
603 points (99.2% liked)

World News

56986 readers
1976 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine struck Russia's largest oil refinery, located in the city of Omsk, on Monday, marking what its forces say was its furthest-ever drone attack in the war.

The Omsk facility, which processes about 21 million tons of oil a year, is in Western Siberia and about 1,700 miles from Ukrainian territory — roughly the distance between Los Angeles and Houston.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Im a little out of the loop, why are they suddenly able to do this now? What changed in their capabilities?

[–] nyan_kas@piefed.social 80 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Ukraine has developed very impressive drone technology in a very short time. It is expected that multiple nations will actually try to make deals to acquire Ukrainian drones at the current NATO summit because they are so good now. So Ukraine is no longer dependent on others to sell them drones. They‘re selling them now.

For example, these drones can use terrain as guidance, so GPS isn’t required for navigation. This also allows them to fly at a very low altitude, avoiding Russian air defense. They’re also very resistant to jamming and have advanced autonomous capabilities, so they can “finish the job” on their own if the link to their operator is severed. Also, they’re very cheap, so it’s possible to overwhelm Russian defenses by swarming them.

In summary, they‘ve developed incredible killing machines that are able to act autonomously, which is very good for them right now but probably not very good for humanity in the long run.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (5 children)

In summary, they‘ve developed incredible killing machines that are able to act autonomously, which is very good for them right now but probably not very good for humanity in the long run.

It's possible that this becomes the new "mutually assured destruction" we had back in the 20th. Basically, a cold war brought on by drones instead of nukes. It could mean a near-future of peace, however uneasy. I can't say that living with the looming propagandized threat of the USSR was good, but I think it was a far sight better than being in an active shooting war with them.

[–] group_hug@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

I think that is a crazily optimistic take. Even if countries were to stop outright drone warfare and keep things to cyber attacks and economic warfare there would be nothing to stop them from using the tech to attack their own citizens.

US constitution has already proven to be worth about as much as Lloyd and Harry's I.O.Us.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The difference is nobody ever felt comfortable nuking their own civilians. I think chemical weapons are a better comparison. Autonomous drones will become illegal and unacceptable in warfare, but for riot control less lethal ones will be common and occasionally an authoritarian leader will use the military grade ones on minority groups or dissidents.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

a cold war brought on by drones instead of nukes

Oh great now I am worried about drones carrying dirty bombs.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That's exactly what people are worried about happening.

[–] Nautalax@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Dirty bombs are a meme weapon, they’re not really effective except for scaring people who don’t know that they’re not effective

Yeah no because all we will have in response to that is the excuse for the psychos to deploy AI fueled "defense" anti-drone "security" drones flying nonstop 24/7 everywhere. Mechanized mafioso anyone?

[–] monomon@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

It's much harder to control their production, though. They don't need enriched uranium and huge facilities, you can put them together in your bedroom (not at scale, obv.)

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago

Smart countries are scrambling to buy Ukraine cheap effective next-generation drone warfare weapons. This is developing into a very lucrative market for them.

[–] LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

probably not very good for humanity in the long run.

Eh. C'est la vie. We had a good run.

[–] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There was a Black Mirror episode featuring the Boston Dynamics "Dog" robot thing with a machine gun on it, and hunting people down, they are terrifying. It's like being hunted by a zombie tbag doesn't eat or sleep or get tired and won't stop.

Flying drones are a whole new level of scary beyond that.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

zombie tbag sounds pretty horrifying

[–] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 1 points 18 hours ago

Screams in British

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

That was a great episode, scary foreshadowing of the future, but still a great episode.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

And for all of this goodness we had Vlad the Invader to thank. Just think where we all be without Vlad!

[–] TRBoom@lemmy.zip 120 points 2 days ago (1 children)

From what I read a few days ago one of the conditions for US aid under biden was that Ukraine make no strikes on russian soil. When trump pulled all the aid to Ukraine it was a huge blow, but also took the leash off.

After that all they had in their way was developing the actual drones and techniques to make the strikes, as well as planning them.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 66 points 2 days ago

As far as I know, the condition was that US (nor NATO) weapons can't be used on attacks to Russian soil. That's one part why Ukraine has basically done a world record speedrun on native drone production. No one has (nor can) deny them from using their own weapons how they see fit.

Removing stupid limitations on how they can hit back has helped, but that was mostly for short(ish) range missiles.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They basically reinvented the Nazi V1 with their Flamingo, and although only small % get through, it's devastatingly accurate against refineries.

Meanwhile, Russia uses the old Nazi strategy of launching very expensive rockets at apartments with civilians in cities, doing 0 strategic damage to Ukraine war capabilities, just like the Nazi V1 and later V2 was used and was relatively useless despite its high price.

Oh, and Ukraine can shoot at almost all Russia's refineries and weapons factories, but Russia can't do it back because Ukrainian can always import from refineries and factories in France, Germany, etc, beyond the NATO border...

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Why are all your call backs to nazis?

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look at the v1. Then look at the flamingo. It's almost like they pulled an 80 year old drawing out of a drawer for their design! And the Russian tactic of causing panic and terror is exactly what Nazi's did with bombing London! I do it because it makes sense. This special military operation got so out of hand the world wars are almost the only historic wars worth comparing it too. Just hope he gets hanged by a mob like Mussolini or shoots himself in his bunker soon...

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Maybe just try mixing it up a bit, most jet powered cruse missiles end up looking like a V1 (that itself was not a new layout) for one example. You can vary your references by pointing to non nazi examples, not all the time but throw in an alternative at least some time. It is not like the nazi's even invented much, like the terror strikes to London where tried in ww1 for another example. They where kinda shit after all and its just weird to use them like a measuring stick to everything.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where I'm from, they are the measuring stick for "authoritarian state goes total war over ideology and fucks up" in a modern/mechanised way.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And that's a fine use, but to also use them in measuring Ukrainian technical development is still odd.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just really found the flamingo resembles it. I'm no current rocketry expert, so in my brain seeing pictures of a Flamingo referenced to something historical I do know and which I think is very widely known. There's nothing more to it than that.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its not the rocket part that makes it take that shape, its the long range turbofan jet engine that causes it to look like that. The V1 used a pulse engine but really the same issue in design. You have an engine that requires an intake (unlike most rockets) and ether you slap it on top (like the Flamingo or V1 or Tu-141) or build the body around it, causing cost increases and issues with warhead placement (like the Tomahawk)

[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Comparing fascist Russia with fascist Germany seems pretty par for the course.

"If the boot fits" ~ Woody the Cowboy

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean sure? But why also talk about Ukraine in the nazi context? Its not even really wrong, just weird.

[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah that's literally just that guy.

He's trying to stir up shit.

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 59 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They've been specifically targeting Russian Air defenses for awhile now forcing them to spread what little they do have even more. Since NATO have been pussies about providing them long range precision munitions they've had to spend time to develop their own cruise missiles like the Neptune and Flamingo the latter of which has entered regular production and has a range of 3000km.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FP-5_Flamingo

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago

Ukraine is now the premier world class developer of advanced drone warfare equipment and counter electronic jamming systems.

[–] Wrongdoer2@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The article says that they’re jet launched.

[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 10 points 2 days ago

That makes sense, they're flying sorties over Siberia to launch drones in the last mile.

[–] newton@feddit.online 2 points 2 days ago

Its called adapting to new situation