this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
120 points (94.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

70457 readers
123 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I used Mullvad for a long time, but hearing about one of the two CEOs actively supporting and financing swedish Nazis, I'm looking to put my money elsewhere. That's the second one after Private Internet Access (who supported Gab).

I had AirVPN and Surfshark being recomnended, how do people here feel? What do you use?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 73 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

there was an article today about the entire mullvad company being blindsided by this and a lot of people being upset. with any luck the guy will leave or get thrown out.

also i think they're technically nazbols.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 43 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Cofounder, and 50% owner. For him to get kicked out would take a lot.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

he could be a rational human about it and see that it's bad for the brand. considering he was willing to work with a guy that actively dislikes what he did he may have a few braincells left.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That kinda seems unlikely to me. I'm certain that he's aware that supporting ethnic cleansing (albeit not overtly violent) is not compatible with having customers.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 2 months ago

they don't tend to see it like that from my experience. but yeah the chance is slim.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think "would take a lot" might be understating it.

It's likely he'd have to be bought out by the other guy with an attractive offer.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 16 points 2 months ago

co-. the other founder is pretty pissed.

[–] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is the only reason for why I haven't demanded a refund of my remaining balance yet. I'm holding out for a dismissal or something.

[–] anothermember@feddit.uk 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Demanding a refund could add to the pressure though, you could always renew after he (hopefully) goes. I can't get a refund since mine has just run out but I'm not making any long-term decisions until the dust has settled.

[–] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago

I totally agree! It's just that I have two routers setup with them, running 24/7, and I have configured mom's devices with my account and I don't have the time to reconfigure all this with something else at the moment. 😩

[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are many options. It's important to do some research on these options. It's also important to know why you want to choose a certain provider. Check their Terms of Service and Privacy Policy at the very least. For now, I'm looking into IVPN.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

also i think they're technically nazbols.

what's a nazbol?

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

National Bolsheviks, in essence merging nazism with communism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Bolshevism

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 months ago

National Bolsheviks, in essence merging nazism with communism.

Nazism+

what an awful idea

[–] FilthyHands@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 6 points 2 months ago

Yes! Alternatively you can just put an Z there too, same meaning.

[–] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 months ago

A Nazi, basically.

It stands for "national bolshevism," so tankies minus the leftism, which... yeah.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 14 points 2 months ago

national bolsheviks. basically ultranationalist tankies.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

This is likely true, but in the hacker news thread about this, the non Nazi cofounder was pretty defensive about what a great guy he was, and that there was just no way that him being a Nazi could ever effect Mullvad itself:

Here's one example, but these linked thread has more excuses hes made:

kfreds 1 day ago | root | parent | next [–]

I'm sorry to hear that. For what it's worth I think there's nuance in his decision that most people don't see. Of course that doesn't mean I think it was the right decision to make.

Here's something worth considering: why would someone whose ideal is open borders, who has been an animal rights activist, and someone who has led Mullvad for 17 years (with the track record it has), choose to donate to this party? If you like what Daniel and I have done together over the past 17 years, and now vehemently oppose his choice to make this donation, doesn't that make you just a little bit curious?

It made me curious. It didn't change my ultimate stance, but it did temper my emotions about it.

https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=kfreds

That level of denial feels custom made for them to give him a pass and keep him onboard.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 2 months ago

when you've known someone personally for that long you're bound to get defensive, i think. and the question is worth considering; why?

[–] anothermember@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 2 months ago

from the same paper that did the original reporting. swedish and paywalled unfortunately, but the first few paragraphs are readable.