this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
226 points (96.3% liked)

Fuck AI

7070 readers
1657 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Excerpt:

The IPO Math Forces the Issue

Both OpenAI and Anthropic are on IPO timelines for the second half of 2026. OpenAI completed the largest private funding round in history in April, $122 billion at an $852 billion post-money valuation. Anthropic has reportedly surpassed $30 billion in annualized revenue. Massive numbers, both of them. Also both attached to companies that are still burning cash at extraordinary rates.

Public markets will not tolerate the gap between subscription revenue and compute cost that has defined the past three years. The moment either company files, analysts will demand unit economics that show a path to margin. Usage-based billing is the fastest way to demonstrate that path.

None of this contradicts the repricing thesis. The pricing war is the last land grab before the gate closes. Both companies are spending aggressively now to lock in users whose switching costs will make them sticky when prices rise. OpenAI offers two months free. Anthropic offers 50% more capacity. Both expire in July. What comes after July is the real pricing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 9 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

My first thought is that companies that built dependence on AI workflows will just start hiring humans again.

But I think it's more likely they'll just switch to free, self-hosted AI models.

[–] Cityshrimp@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Still not “free” even if self-hosted and I would think perf and accuracy would be noticeably worse.

My company started using AI in coding process a lot more now but its only because the AI responses are useful 80% of the time. If its lower than that, not worth the time to use for most tasks.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 9 hours ago

I don't really think it matters. Companies that have adopted AI are already fucked. It hurts more then helps.

But they'll be willing to thow VC money at hiring people to setup AI systems, despite how much worse it leaves them

load more comments (2 replies)