this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
391 points (96.4% liked)

News

37401 readers
1868 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In case you’re still lost as to what the heck is going on, a Scientology Run is when people film themselves charging into a Church of Scientology building to see how far they can get before being caught and booted out. It’s a notoriously secretive religion, so it turns the whole place into an action-movie set piece where the protagonist is trying to infiltrate a compound while fending off its legion of foot soldiers, clad in terrifying white button-ups with black vests.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I dunno. These are cracking me up for some reason and even though this article is a bit shallow, I think a decent point was made at the end: power charging religious buildings is kinda bad taste I think - even if Scientology is full of complete asshole weirdos.

[–] Fusselwurm@feddit.org 71 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Scientology is not a religion

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Sounds like something a religious person would say to feel like their religion is more sensible.

[–] DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It's absolutely a cult. Ex enforcer Mike Rinder himself called Scientology an intelligence gathering organisation.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Religion, cult, intelligence gathering… none mutually exclusive.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Give it a few more generations, and it’ll look like Mormonism (originally an obviously scammy personality cult with a problematic founder, but now a respectable pillar of conservative society). Another century or two and it’ll be like Lutheranism or Episcopalianism: so much part of the background that people don’t even notice the weird stuff in its doctrines.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Scientology isn't based on an already accepted mainstream religion and they're losing membership. History rhymes, it doesn't always repeat.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 points 2 days ago

That should have had an “if it survives long enough”; most weird cults/sects don’t.

[–] DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, I get that but isn't LDS considered still a cult? It certainly fits a lot of the criteria.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

By who? Other Christian’s or religious people? Typical of them to accuse everyone else of being a cult.

Legally, no.

If you ask anyone sane, all religion is a cult.

[–] DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

By people that study cults and other high control groups, I mean.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago

All religions are cults.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 days ago

Yea. What do you think confession is?

[–] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's pretty well documented that L. Ron Hubbard founded Scientology to serve as a financial tool. Hence the financial controversies and the IRS battles from the 70s-90s

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree, but that doesn’t prevent a social club from being a religion, does it?

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There's a clear difference between an organisation intentionally created as a cult in living memory and one which, as far as we all know, arose organically from the sincere beliefs of people.

It doesn't make the beliefs of one more true or something, it's just a useful categorisation.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You just said the difference is time and the fact no one can remember the religions founding. Which is no clear difference at all.

[–] it_wasnt_arson@awful.systems 2 points 2 days ago

Time tends to sand off the rough edges of any organization that wants to keep pulling in new members and that doesn't need a framework of total control to protect itself from fizzling out early. It's an evolutionary process, not just historical whitewashing. Though it's also historical whitewashing.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

Well that's not quite what I said. But either way, I think it's pretty clear. What are some examples you think lie in the grey area?

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago

Mentally ill people have sincere beliefs too.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well the thing is, it's a cult.

[–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 8 points 2 days ago

Well yes, especially given that the Catholic church is basically (for a given value of 'basically') a continuation of the Roman empire, a financial instrument clothed in religion. Same as Scientology.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There's different types of names for a group depending on certain variables. Not all cults are religions.

The difference between a cult and a religion is that in a cult the person at the top of the pyramid scheme knows it’s all a bullshit grift and everyone else is a true believer, it’s a religion when that person dies.

[–] Obituarykidney@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I didn't say that though did I? I said all religions are cults.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

True. I'm not sure what my point was, honestly.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

What's the difference between a religion and a cult? Its size and follower numbers?

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It’s whether the person you’re talking to just happens to be a part of that religion or not, typically.

They are all cults to me. Some just have better pr.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

charging religious buildings is kind do bad taste

Fuck em they're an organization built on kidnapping and abuse.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 days ago

On the other hand, all religions are complete weirdos and not a single one of them deserves special status or protections.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

calling exploitative cult a religion is quite bad taste imo

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

Which religion isn't though?

They're all exploitive and cult-like in my opinion.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's a difference, aside from size and social recognition?

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Control. Generally speaking a religion and a cult are differentiated by how much they demand or control in members lives. Scientology, Mormons, and even a lot of Southern Baptists are generally cults or really cult like. For comparison Anglicans, Quakers, and progressive Neo-Pagans are on average not cults even if they are insane and playing with the dynamics at times.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The hallmarks of cults is: separation from friends or family, a person or ruling body that delivers the one and true version, punishment for rule breaking, and a difficulty separating. Also, it almost always devolves into sex slavery and/or arranged unions.

Those things give you control of course, but they are the basic guidelines of cult like behaviour.

Yeah there are probably dozens of definitions of cult with tonnes of overlap but without complete agreement. Just a notable example is there are some cults which pop up wherein they don't necessarily have a ruling body since it's basically a cavalcade of idiots feeding into each other.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

So christianity was more of a cult in medieval times?

Depended on region and what period of the medieval era, for example Iceland around 1000 absolutely not, but in France during the crusades absolutely was. Remember the medieval era lasted about a thousand years and was spread across Europe so there's lots of nuance.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 days ago

Plenty of sects cut you off still. Like Catholics.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

reminder: scientology is not a religion.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Reminder: all religions are made up and mental illness adajcent.

[–] Escape13@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah sorry this one is actually a cult and not a religion.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Escape13@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago

Leave the pastafaria a alone, ok?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It is, for tax purposes.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No. No it’s not at all.

Religion is in bad taste. And before you come at me, go witness a few religious atrocities first. Like Gaza.

[–] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I won’t come at you at all with that statement friend.