this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
671 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

19991 readers
2461 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 12 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

and then some bozo says that biology is just complicated chemistry and chemistry is just complicated physics and we can simulate physics

curious thing is that i never hear biologists or chemists saying that, only some physicists and techbros. just trying to simulate your way out of small organic chemistry problems will make you even more hopelessly lost than you were before

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

This is why I'm a geographer. We know what we are.

I get to gleefully embrace my role as generalist who fanboys over real science.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

What is a geographer? Seems like a super broad category. Are you a cartographer? Surveyor? Or do you just like, talk about mountains and the shape of the coast line?

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean the relation between those isn't wrong but like... we can't simulate complicated physics. At least not at any reasonable speed.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

some people would tell you that we can simulate small bits of chemistry but it's flat out wrong (i might be biased as i've wrangled for a year with computational chemists about results that don't conform to reality) and even then errors are so large that's it's useless

[–] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I was involved with a project trying to simulate growth of a crystal cluster a couple of years ago. The guy doing the coding said it would be easy. It never worked and never came remotely close.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 7 points 8 hours ago

Model fetishism