this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
72 points (97.4% liked)

Fuck AI

7157 readers
1430 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
72
AI Code is Hollowing Out Open Source, and Maintainers are Looking the Other Way (www.quippd.com)
submitted 1 month ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TL;DR: The advent of AI based, LLM coding applications like Anthropic’s Claude and ChatGPT have prompted maintainers to experiment with integrating LLM contributions into open source codebases.

This is a fast path to open source irrelevancy, since the US copyright office has deemed LLM outputs to be uncopyrightable. This means that as more uncopyrightable LLM outputs are integrated into nominally open source codebases, value leaks out of the project, since the open source licences are not operative on public domain code.

That means that the public domain, AI generated code can be reused without attribution, and in the case of copyleft licences - can even be used in closed source projects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Looks at Jellyfin: https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/contributing/llm-policies/#llm-code-contributions-to-official-projects

[–] themoken@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

That seems pretty good to me? I hate LLMs, but this policy is basically "if it's obviously LLM garbage or you don't understand it, it will be rejected" and I'm not sure it's practical to do better.

People will use LLMs behind the scenes, but if they are able to write a coherent justification with clear understanding of the code, receive feedback from devs and rework it, as well as submitting code that is well structured etc. it's not really any different than any other PR.

[–] yoasif@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Except for the fact that it is public domain and not protected by the open source license that the code is ostensibly submitted under.

[–] themoken@startrek.website 3 points 1 month ago

How are the devs or anyone else supposed to tell that though, if all the LLM trappings are absent?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)