this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
568 points (99.1% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

6762 readers
3 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SneakyWeasel@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Well every job i have worked at requires me to not use ai. Is this all private companies?

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The company I work for (publicly listed) has granted company-wide access to Copilot, but requires users to complete a pretty extensive (2+ hour) training module before you’re able to use it.

Pretty obvious stuff like, don’t upload sensitive data, validate output etc. I just use it as a glorified search engine usually - validating function syntaxes etc., and also cot rewriting email to be less blunt.

Really comes down to whether companies have; no tech departments to stop employees from using AI, small departments that don’t want to deal with the headache, large departments capable of managing the rollout.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I wonder how they feel about the fact that Microsoft declared Copilot to be "for entertainment purposes only", therefore shielding themselves from any lawsuits and leaving all users liable for the mistakes Copilot makes

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty unsurprised, I imagine - our training pretty much instructs us to not take anything it produces as gospel already.

Though given how much the company is getting charged for it, I think there may be some reconsideration in the budget for next financial year - given Microsoft have all but confirmed that it’s not much more than an overly verbose Magic 8 Ball

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

2+ hours is "pretty extensive" where you work?

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

Given that the rest of our annual training refreshers are 15 - 30 minutes, and that I can boil down the training to 2-3 bullet points here - yes, 2+ hours is (relatively) extensive.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah, you've just been lucky

What field you working in? I know some are more security conscious and don't allow AI for that reason (gambling, sports betting, banking)

[–] SneakyWeasel@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm a programmer analyst(don't want to say where). I just notice on most job postings that AI is always being looked at as a tool for someone to use so i was just curious.