I think the plan is to change those demographics.
47
Supreme Court signals it will let fuel producers sue over California emission standards
(www.mercurynews.com)
23
Supreme Court signals it will let fuel producers sue over California emission standards
(www.mercurynews.com)
66
Trump aides look at shrinking at least 6 national monuments for mining, oil
(www.washingtonpost.com)
25
Trump aides look at shrinking at least 6 national monuments for mining, oil
(www.washingtonpost.com)
The problem isn't whether you can do it, it's that very few places have access to the electrical transmission capacity to deliver the charge that quickly.
There are lots, but they mostly have quite limited power to do so in an effective way.
You see a lot from Democratic Attorneys General, since they're in a position to sue.
They have two things going on:
- the historical weather data is what gets used to show past climate and the change we are seeing
- the founder of AccuWeather thinks he can make more money if government forecasts are less accurate and paid his way into the upper echelon of the Republican Party.
In a world where we do a renewables build-out, we will have an excess of electricity available at some times of day. Time-shifting its use in a low-tech way is definitely within what I'd consider green.
Sadly CO2 ends up distributed worldwide and affects everybody everywhere
Kinda: No deadline. No specific required steps. No consequences.
Trump will politely ask for his return with a wink, nothing will happen, and he'll rot in a prison in El Salvador until either the US or El Salvador undergoes regime change.
Showdown maybe. They don't have a deadline or consequences for failing to act or requirement that they actually take steps which result in his being returned to the US.
They're mostly constrained by not having the votes in Congress or the Supreme Court to actually do anything. That's why we get words and protests from them instead of meaningful action.
His ability to enforce a "block this state law" instruction is one of those things which might actually be limited by the law.
To within the range of expected natural variability when looking at global average temperature anomaly.
They're not as good at things like regional predictions or second-order effects
The problem with things like crypto and genAI is that they're capital-intensive, which makes little sense for something that's only available as excess for part of the day on a seasonal basis.
Storage has the same problem, though it does a lot more for people.