I’ve grown up on TNG and watched everything Trek. I do enjoy the new stuff. Is it silly sometimes and is the writing whacky? Yes of course. But let’s not act as if Trek ever took canon too seriously, and always had impeccable writing. It’s part of it.
rooroo
joined 2 years ago
Yeah but then it should be negative infinite, cause if x<8 the fraction is negative.
Nobody is talking bombings, mate, just arguing what “nothing to do” means.
This ain’t about (the scale of) military interventions, but about rhetorics and semantics.
If you wanna be morally superior, at least get your facts right.
Goodbye, and thanks for all the Cetaecian Ops?
Boil em, mash em, throw em in the sea.
All of this is true. The ring was 22ft instead of the normal 20 iirc (so in my sane measurements conversion about a 60cm difference per side) and Paul’s antics were annoying af, albeit fun to watch in a cringe kind of way.
You should add two to the list of his former opponents: Younger brother of a top tier boxer who never seems to want to be there (against whom he lost) and former top tier 30 years past his prime.
If it’s true that Netflix forced him into AJ it’s hilarious though, as I understand he’s their only boxer with any following and they just embarrassed him.
I actually enjoy watching his brother in MMA. I don’t like him, still think he’s an asshole, but he’s embracing being a heel so much that it’s highly enjoyable to watch.
Why not both? The system might need aftercare too.
If only squirrel weren’t a popular sql gui tool already.
I mean yea. Don’t see your point, it’s still an uglification of a useful language
Doesn’t react have scoped styles like vue does?
view more: next ›
I didn’t watch gossip girl so I can’t speak on that. And honestly, I’m a trek nerd, but your obsessive hate seems unhealthy. Just don’t watch it if you don’t want to, all the old trek is still there for you.