On the contrary, AI enables voice actors to change their voice in ways that biology won't let them. If a voice actor can act, AI will give them the power to play more parts than they would have been able to previously.
It's just a tool. It's not the magic, "replace humans" thing people think it is.
Generative AI is theft in the same way that cars stole the livelihoods away from farriers.
Actually, it's not quite that bad because it just makes existing jobs more efficient. "Big AI" thinks that it will keep evolving at the same pace as Moore's Law but there's currently no evidence to suggest that's true.
It'll get faster, for sure but that won't make it better. I wouldn't be surprised if everyone's still complaining about AI hallucinating things 50 years from now. It'll just be quicker and easier to re-do the output when it does.
Here's my realistic predictions, based on everything I've actually used and studied about AI (I follow it very closely):
Please check the grammar! It costs nothing but a few minutes of your time! Seriously: It's a free service. Use it!).What do all of these things have in common? They're not taking people's jobs.
It's just like any automation that humans have adopted since the industrial revolution. Sure, a company may require fewer workers to perform a task but at the same time that creates new jobs that didn't exist before.
It's the natural evolution of work: As time goes on jobs become more specialized and old jobs go away. It's been like that for a long time now.
Is AI going to accelerate that trend? Yeah probably. But only in the short term. Long term, it will result in more jobs and more productivity.
Aside: I'd like to point out that the rich getting richer is an orthogonal concept to productivity. That's a function of government/economic systems. Not automation or scientific advancement.